Validation of the Knowledge, Comfort, Approach, and Attitudes Towards Sexuality Scale for Use with Rehabilitation Counseling Students: An Exploratory Factor Analysis

  • 8 Accesses


As research on sexuality and disability in the field of rehabilitation counseling increases, having a validated measure to assess knowledge, comfort, and attitudes towards sexuality and disability in rehabilitation counselors becomes essential. Previously validated measures of sexuality and disability have largely been utilized in healthcare settings and have not been validated in the field of rehabilitation counseling. This article utilizes exploratory factor analysis to address the validity of using the Knowledge, Comfort, Approach, and Attitudes Towards Sexuality Scale with rehabilitation counseling students. Results indicate a poor model fit, suggesting that it may be inappropriate for use with rehabilitation counseling students. The need for a new or revised measure is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Burling, K., Tarvydas, V.M., Maki, D.R.: Human sexuality and disability: a holisitic interpretation of rehabilitation counseling. J. Appl. Rehabil. Couns. 25(1), 10–16 (1994)

  2. 2.

    Tepper, M.S.: Letting go of restrictive notions of manhood: male sexuality, disability and chronic illness. Sex. Disabil. 17(1), 15 (1999)

  3. 3.

    Tepper, M.S.: Sexuality and disability: the missing discourse of pleasure. Sex. Disabil. 18(4), 7 (2000)

  4. 4.

    Di Giulio, G.: Sexuality and people living with physical or developmental disabilities: a review of key issues. Can. J. Hum. Sex. 12(1), 53–68 (2003)

  5. 5.

    Kazukauskas, K.A., Lam, C.S.: Disability and sexuality: knowledge, attitudes, and level of comfort among certified rehabilitation counselors. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 54(1), 15–25 (2010)

  6. 6.

    Juergens, M.H., Smedema, S.M., Berven, N.L.: Willingness of graduate students in rehabilitation counseling to discuss sexuality with clients. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 53(1), 34–43 (2009)

  7. 7.

    Pebdani, R.N.: Rehabilitation counselor knowledge, comfort, approach, and attitude toward sex and disability. Rehabil. Res. Policy Educ. 27(1), 32–43 (2013)

  8. 8.

    Pebdani, R.N., Johnson, K.L.: Rehabilitation counseling students report on training and sexuality. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 58(3), 173–175 (2014)

  9. 9.

    Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification. Sexuality and Disability (2018). 23 Apr 2018

  10. 10.

    Haboubi, N.H.J., Lincoln, N.: Views of health professionals on discussing sexual issues with patients. Disabil. Rehabil. 25(6), 291–296 (2003)

  11. 11.

    Council for Accreditation of Counseling & Related Educational Programs. 2016 Cacrep Standards (2016). 8 Dec 2017

  12. 12.

    Fronek, P., et al.: The effectiveness of a sexuality training program for the interdisciplinary spinal cord injury rehabilitation team. Sex. Disabil. 23(2), 51–63 (2005)

  13. 13.

    Post, M.W.M., et al.: Sexological competence of different rehabilitation disciplines and effects of a discipline-specific sexological training. Sex. Disabil. 26(3), 3–14 (2008)

  14. 14.

    Cuskelly, M., Gilmore, L.: Attitudes to sexuality questionnaire (individuals with intellectual disability): scale development and community norms. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 32(3), 214–221 (2007)

  15. 15.

    Cuskelly, M., Bryde, R.: Attitudes towards the sexuality of adults with an intellectual disability: parents, support staff, and a community sample. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 29(3), 9 (2004)

  16. 16.

    Kendall, M., et al.: The development of a scale to assess the training needs of professionals in providing sexuality rehabilitation following spinal cord injury. Sex. Disabil. 21(1), 49–64 (2003)

  17. 17.

    Rahman, P.A., et al.: Reliability and validity of adapted KCAASS using exploratory factor analysis. Soc. Sci. (Pak.) 11(21), 5172–5177 (2016)

  18. 18.

    Verschuren, J.E.A., et al.: Sexuality in people with a lower limb amputation: a topic too hot to handle? Disabil. Rehabil. 35(20), 1698–1704 (2013)

  19. 19.

    Fronek, P., et al.: A longitudinal study of sexuality training for the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. Sex. Disabil. 29(2), 87–100 (2011)

  20. 20.

    Booth, S., et al.: Training the interdisciplinary team in sexuality rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a needs assessment. Sex. Disabil. 21(4), 249–261 (2003)

  21. 21.

    Pieters, R., Kedde, H., Bender, J.: Training rehabilitation teams in sexual health care: a description and evaluation of a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil. Rehabil. 40(6), 732–739 (2018)

  22. 22.

    Schafer, J.L.: Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8(1), 3–15 (1999)

  23. 23.

    Corp, I.: IBM SPSS Statistics: Version 23. Author Armonk, New York (2016)

  24. 24.

    MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., Sugawara, H.M.: Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1(2), 130 (1996)

  25. 25.

    Equal Pay Act of 1963, in Pub.L, pp. 88–38 (1963)

  26. 26.

    Muthén, L.K., Muthen, B.: Mplus User’s Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables, User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén (2017)

  27. 27.

    Guttman, L.: Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 19(2), 149–161 (1954)

  28. 28.

    Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1), 141–151 (1960)

  29. 29.

    Cooper, C.: Individual Differences. Arnold, London (1998)

  30. 30.

    Pallant, J.: SPSS Survival Manual, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2005)

  31. 31.

    Cattell, R.B.: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1(2), 245–276 (1966)

  32. 32.

    Norman, G., Streiner, D.: Biostatistics—The Bare Essentials. Mosby, St Louis (1994)

  33. 33.

    Schmitt, T.A.: Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 29(4), 304–321 (2011)

  34. 34.

    McIntosh, C.N.: Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: a commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Personal. Individ. Differ. 42(5), 859–867 (2007)

  35. 35.

    Worthington, R.L., Whittaker, T.A.: Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns. Psychol. 34(6), 806–838 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Roxanna N. Pebdani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pebdani, R.N., Saeki, E. Validation of the Knowledge, Comfort, Approach, and Attitudes Towards Sexuality Scale for Use with Rehabilitation Counseling Students: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. Sex Disabil (2020).

Download citation


  • Rehabilitation counseling
  • Exploratory factor analysis
  • Sexuality
  • Disability
  • Knowledge
  • Comfort
  • Attitude
  • United States