Advertisement

Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 515–532 | Cite as

“Remember Our Voices are Our Tools:” Sexual Self-advocacy as Defined by People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

  • Carli Friedman
  • Catherine K. Arnold
  • Aleksa L. Owen
  • Linda Sandman
Original Paper

Abstract

This exploratory study examines how people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) define and experience sexuality in the context of their identities as self-advocates. Using nominal group technique this study found self-advocates described sexual self-advocacy as relating to knowing and respecting themselves, respect for others, choices, speaking up, having their rights respected, getting information, healthy relationships, and interdependence. They also explained facilitators that would increase their sexual self-advocacy such as expanding access to information and sexual health services, removing systemic barriers, educating others, increasing access to counseling, and developing opportunities for sexual expression. The significance of the study is the expansion of research on sexual self-advocacy by bringing the sexuality and self-advocacy literatures together, reinforcing the value of people with IDD as legitimate sources of information about their own experiences, and providing a sustainable and accessible research method for working with people with IDD.

Keywords

Sexual self-advocacy Self-advocacy Intellectual and developmental disabilities Sexuality Sexual health Social work United States 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was sponsored in part by a Grant from the Institute on Policy and Civic Engagement at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations: Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml (2006)
  2. 2.
    Linton, S.: Reassigning meaning. In: Linton, S. (ed.) Claiming Disability, Knowledge and Identity, pp. 8–33. New York University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moras, R.J.: Feminism, rape culture and intellectual disability: Incorporating sexual self-advocacy and sexual consent capacity. In: Wappett, M., Arndt, K. (eds.) Emerging Perspectives on Disability Studies, pp. 189–207. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayden, M.F., Nelis, T.: Self-advocacy. In: Schalock, R.L., Baker, P.C., Croser, M.D. (eds.) Embarking on a New Century: Mental Retardation at the End of the 20th Century, pp. 221–234. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shapiro, J.: No pity: People With Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. Random House LLC, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armstrong, D.: The politics of self-advocacy and people with learning disabilities. Policy Polit. 30(3), 333–345 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dybwad, G., Bersani, H.: New Voices: Self-advocacy by People with Disabilities. Brookline Books, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pennell, R.L.: Self-determination and self-advocacy: shifting the power. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 11(4), 223–227 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kempton, W., Kahn, E.: Sexuality and people with intellectual disabilities: a historical perspective. Sex. Disabil. 9(2), 91–111 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tilleya, E., Walmsleya, J., Earlea, S., Atkinsona, D.: ‘The silence is roaring’: Sterilization, reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities. Disabil. Soc. 27(3), 413–426 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andron, L., Ventura, J.: Sexual dysfunction in couples with learning handicaps. Sex. Disabil. 8(1), 25–35 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mattison, J.: Marriage and Mental Handicap. Duckworth, London (1970)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy, M.: Women with intellectual disability: their sexual lives in the 21st century. J. Intell. Dev. Disabil. 39(2), 124–131 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernert, D.J.: Sexuality and disability in the lives of women with intellectual disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 29(2), 129–141 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Azzopardi-Lane, C., Callus, A.: Constructing sexual identities: people with intellectual disability talking about sexuality. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 1–8 (2014). doi: 10.1111/bld.12083
  16. 16.
    Fitzgerald, C., Withers, P.: ‘I don’t know what a proper woman means’: what women with intellectual disabilities think about sex, sexuality and themselves. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 41(1), 5–12 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swango-Wilson, A.: Systems theory and the development of sexual identity for individuals with intellectual/developmental disability. Sex. Disabil. 28(3), 157–164 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gomez, M.T.: The S words: sexuality, sensuality, sexual expression and people with intellectual disability. Sex. Disabil. 30(2), 237–245 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winges-Yanez, N.: Why all the talk about sex? An autoethnography identifying the troubling discourse of sexuality and intellectual disability. Sex. Disabil. 32(2), 107–116 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Green Mountain Self-Advocates: Sexuality education for adults with developmental disabilities. In: Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Burlington, VT (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graham, B., Nelis, T., Sandman, L., Arnold, C.K., Parker, S.: Promoting sexual citizenship and self-advocacy for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: the sexuality and disability consortium. Commun. Psychol. 44(1), 8–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merriam, S.B.: Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sue, D.W., Capodilupo, C.M., Nadal, K.L., Torino, G.C.: Racial microaggressions and the power to define reality. Am. Psychol. 63(4), 277–279 (2008). doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker, A., Israel, B., Gustat, J., Reyes, A., Allen, A.J.I.: Strategies and techniques for effective group process in CBPR partnerships. In: Israel, B., Eng, E., Schultz, A., Parker, E. (eds.) Methods for Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McMurray, A.R.: Three decision-making aids: brainstorming, nominal group, and Delphi technique. J. Nurs. Staff Dev. 10(2), 62–65 (1994)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L.: The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Acad. Manag. J. 17(4), 605–621 (1974). doi: 10.2307/255641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roeden, J., Maaskant, M., Curfs, L.: The views of clients with mild intellectual disabilities regarding their working relationships with caregivers. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 24(5), 398–406 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Bernal, J., Butler, G., Hollins, S., Curfs, L.: Using Nominal Group Technique to investigate the views of people with intellectual disabilities on end-of-life care provision. J. Adv. Nurs. 58(1), 80–89 (2007)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mactavish, J., Mahon, M., Lutfiyya, Z.M.: “I can speak for myself”: involving individuals with intellectual disabilities as research participants. Ment. Retard. 38(2), 216–227 (2000)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nind, M.: Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges. National Centre for Research Methods, Southampton (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boeije, H.: A purposeful approach to the constant comparison method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual. Quant. 36, 391–409 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Glaser, B.G.: Emergence vs. forcing: basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1992)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tesch, R.: Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software. Falmer Press, London (1990)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holton, J.A.: The coding process and its challenges. Ground Theory Rev 9(1), 21–40 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Metzl, J.M., Kirkland, A. (eds.): Against Health: How Health Became the New Morality. New York University Press, New York and London (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morse, J.: Qualitative generalizability. Qual. Health Res. 9(5), 5–6 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Myers, M.: Qualitative research and the generalizability question: standing firm with Proteus. Qual. Rep. 4(3/4), 1–9 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phillips, C., McLeroy, K.: Health in rural America: remembering the importance of place. Am. J. Publ. Health 94(10), 1661–1663 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sparks, J.: Rural health disparities. In: Kulcsar, L., Curtis, K. (eds.) International Handbook of Rural Demography, vol. 3, pp. 255–271. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wallace, A., Weeks, W., Wang, S., Lee, A., Kazis, L.: Rural and urban disparities in health-related quality of life among veterans with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatr. Serv. 57(6), 851–856 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weeks, W., Kazis, L., Shen, Y., Cong, Z., Ren, X., Miller, D., Lee, A., Perlin, J.: Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. Am. J. Publ. Health 94(10), 1762–1767 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weeks, W., Wallace, A., Wang, S., Lee, A., Kazis, L.: Rural–urban disparities in health-related quality of life within disease categories of veterans. J. Rural Health 22(3), 204–211 (2006). doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00033.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Braddock, D., Hemp, R., Rizzolo, M.C., Tanis, E.S., Haffer, L., Lulinski, A., Wu, J.: The state of the states in developmental disabilities 2013: The great recession and its aftermath (preliminary edition). Department of Psychiatry and Coleman Institute, University of Colorado and Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, Boulder (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Braddock, D., Hemp, R., Rizzolo, M.C.: Services and funding for people with developmental disabilities: how does Illinois compare to other states?. University of Illinois at Chicago and University of Colorado, Chicago and Boulder (2011)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nelis, T., Rizzolo, M.C., Hemp, R.: Use of state institutions for people with intellectual disabilities in Illinois: fiscal year 2009. University of Illinois at Chicago and University of Colorado, Chicago, Illinois and Boulder, Colorado (2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Associated Press: Illinois’ stack of overdue bills falls to $7.6 billion. http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20131230/NEWS02/131239989/illinois-stack-of-overdue-bills-falls-to-7-6-billion (2013)
  49. 49.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carli Friedman
    • 1
  • Catherine K. Arnold
    • 1
  • Aleksa L. Owen
    • 1
  • Linda Sandman
    • 1
  1. 1.Disability and Human DevelopmentUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations