Advertisement

Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 15–28 | Cite as

Disability, Gender and Intimate Partner Violence: Relationships from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

  • Diane L. SmithEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Research on women with disabilities has found that the most common perpetrators of violence were current or former intimate partners (Young et al. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, S34–S38, 1997; Riddington, Beating the “odds”: Violence and Women with Disabilities (Position Paper 2). 1989). This article examines intimate partner sexual and physical abuse experienced by women with disabilities compared to women without disabilities and men with and without disabilities through chi square analysis and regression analysis using data from the 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Results show that women with disabilities experienced almost twice the rate of all forms of abuse compared to the other populations. Variables increasing the likelihood of abuse include being female, disabled, not employed, uncoupled and younger age. Implications for future research, screening and intervention for rehabilitation professionals are discussed.

Keywords

Women with disabilities Intimate partner violence Rehabilitation 

References

  1. 1.
    Collins, K.S., Schoen, S.J., Duchon, L., Simantor, E., Yellowitz, M.: Health Concerns across a Women’s Lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women’s Health. Commonwealth Fund, New York (1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N.: Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington (2000).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young, M.E., Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Chanpong, G., Rintala, D.H.: Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, S34–S38 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finkelhor, D., Korbin, J.: Child abuse as an international issue. Child Abuse Negl. 12, 3–23 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Claussen, A.H., Crittenden, P.M.: Physical and psychological maltreatment: relations among types of maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 15, 5–18 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Campbell, J.C.: The abuse assessment screen: A clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity and perpetrator of abuse against women. In: Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Campbell, J.C. (eds.) Beyond Diagnosis: Health Care Advocacy for Battered Women and their Children. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cole, S.S.: Facing the challenges of sexual abuse in persons with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 7, 71–88 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brownridge, D.A.: Partner violence against women with disabilities: prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women 12, 805–822 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, S.L., Ray, N., Sotres-Alvarez, D., Kupper, L.L., Moracco, K.E., Dickens, P.A.: Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women 12, 823–837 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Young, M.E.: Abuse of women with disabilities: policy implications. J. Dis. Pol. Stud. 8, 157–176 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nosek, M.A., Foley, C.C., Hughes, R.B., Howland, C.A.: Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 19, 177–189 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassouneh-Phillips, D., Curry, M.A.: Abuse of women with disabilities: state of the science. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 45, 96–104 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilson, S., Cramer, E., DePoy E.: (Re)defining abuse of women with disabilities: a paradox of limitation and expansion. AFFILIA: J. Women Soc. Work 16, 220–235 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curry, M.A., Hassouneh-Phillips, D.H., Johnston-Silverberg, A.J.: Abuse of women with disabilities: an ecological model and review. Violence Against Women 7, 60–79 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riddington, J.: Beating the “Odds”: Violence and Women with Disabilities (Position Paper 2). DisAbled Women’s Network, Vancouver (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andrews, A.B., Veronen, L.J.: Sexual assault and people with disabilities. Special issue: sexuality and disabilities: a guide for human service practitioners. J. Soc. Work Hum. Sex 8, 137–159 (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belsky, J.: Child maltreatment: an ecological integration. Am. Psychol. 35, 320–335 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rutgers University, Bureau of Economic Research, and The World Institute on Disability: Towards an understanding of the demand for personal assistance. Rutgers, n.d., New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Womendez, C., Schneiderman, K.: Escaping from abuse: unique issues for women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 9, 273–280 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farmer, A., Tiefenthaler, J.: Domestic violence: the value of services as signals. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 274–279 (1996).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nosek, M.A.: Sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities. In: Krotoski, D.M., Nosek, M.A., Turk, M.A. (eds.) Women with Physical Disabilities: Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-being, pp. 153–173. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore (1996).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carlson, B.E.: Domestic violence in adults with mental retardation: reports from victims and key informants. Ment. Health Asp. Dev. Disabil. 1, 102–112 (1998).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schaller, J., Fieberg, J.L.: Issues of abuse for women with disabilities and implications for rehabilitation counseling. J. Appl. Rehabil. Couns. 29, 9–17 (1998).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asch, A., Fine, M.: Introduction: Beyond pedestals. In: Fine, M., Asch, A. (eds.) Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture and Politics, pp. 1–37. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1988).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson, K.L.: Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist an family violence approaches. J. Marriage Fam. 59, 655–669 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nosek, M.A., Hughes, R.B., Taylor, H.B., Taylor, P.: Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abused women with physical disabilities. Violence Against Women 12, 838–850 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hightower, J., Smith, G.: Aging, disabilities, and abuse. Aware: Newslett. BC Inst. Against Fam. Violence 10, 17–18 (2003).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carlson, B.E.: Mental retardation and domestic violence: an ecological approach to intervention. Soc. Work 42, 79–89 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crossmaker, M.: Behind locked doors: institutional sexual abuse. Sex. Disabil. 7, 201–219 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Furey, E.M.: Sexual abuse of adults with mental retardation: who and where. Ment. Retard. 32, 173–180 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nelson, D.E., Holtzman, D., Bolen, J., Stanwyck, C.A., Mack, K.A.: Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soc. Prev. Med. 46(Suppl.), S03–S42 (2001).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nelson, D.E., Powell-Griner, E., Town, M., Kovar, M.G.: A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am. J. Pub. Health 93, 1335–1341 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved July, 2004 from http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/faqs.htm (2004). Accessed 9 Oct 2006.
  34. 34.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System user’s guide. Author, Atlanta (1998).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    SPSS : SPSS release 14.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago (2006).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Hughes, R.B.: The investigation of abuse and women with disabilities: going beyond assumptions. Violence Against Women 7, 477–499 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mays, J.M.: Feminist disability theory: domestic violence against women with a disability. Disabil. Societ. 21, 147–158 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McFarlane, J., Hughes, R.B., Nosek, M.A., Groff, J.Y., Swedlund, N., Dolan Mullen, P.: Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with disabilities. J. Women’s Health 10, 861–866 (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology & Community HealthUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations