Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 125–134 | Cite as

Sex Therapy Surrogate Partners for Individuals with Very Limited Functional Ability Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Original Paper

Abstract

The use of surrogate sex therapists for survivors after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) who have Very Limited Functional Ability (VLFA) is discussed. It includes the rationale of using surrogate therapy with this population as well as some of the professional and ethical issues that such therapy can evoke. It is suggested that surrogate therapy can provide satisfaction and positive experiences to the restricted lives of some of the VLFA-TBI survivors. The use of surrogate therapy is viewed as a part of the integral rehabilitation process aimed at improving the quality of life and the fulfillment of basic human intimacy needs. Often requiring help in this important area of life, they are not always able to initiate and control emotional behaviors to promote healthy sexual relationship and activity. Surrogate therapy is an activity that can help survivors with TBI monitor and initiate feelings, reactions and motivation in intimate relationships, as well as provide a certain amount of control over their lives. A case study is presented to illustrate the process of sex therapy with a surrogate partner for a VLFA-TBI survivor.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Sex rehabilitation Sex therapy Surrogate partner 

References

  1. 1.
    Katz, D.I., Zalsler, N.D., Zafonte, R.D.: Clinical continuum of care natural history. In: Zalsler, N.D., Katz, D.I., Zafonte, R.D. (eds.) Brain Injury Medicine, chapter 1, pp. 3–13. Demos (2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Groswasser, Z., Stern, M.J.: A psychodynamic model of behavior after acute central nervous system damage. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 13, 69–79 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffith, E.R., Lemberg, S.: Sexuality and the Person with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Guide for Families. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kreutzer, J.S., Zasler, N.D.: Psychosexual consequences of traumatic brain injury methodology and preliminary findings. Brain Inj. 3, 177–186 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Armstrong, C.: Emotional changes following brain injury: psychological and neurological components of depression, denial, and anxiety. J. Rehabil. 2, 15–21 (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lezak, M.D., O’Brien, T.: Longitudinal study of emotional, social, and physical changes after TBI. J. Learn. Disabil. 21, 456–463 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lezak, M.D.: Brain damage is a family affair. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 10, 111–123 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ponsford, J., Sloan, S.M., Snow, P.: Traumatic Brain Injury: Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living. Erlbaum, Hilladale, NJ (1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandel, M.E., Delmonico, R., Kotch, M.J.: Sexuality, reproduction, and neuroendocrine disorders following TBI. In: Zalsler, N.D., Katz, D.I., Zafonte, R.D. (eds.) Brain Injury Medicine, chapter 37, pp. 673–695. Demos (2007).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perlesz, A., Kiinsella, G., Crow, W.: Impact of TBI on the family: a critical review. Rehabil. Psychol. 44, 6–35 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keren, O., Groswasser, Z., Stern, M.J.: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): evaluation at acute and sub-acute phase, assessment of outcome, description of neurobehavioral and some lines of recommendation for management. Sist. Nerv. 1, 23–33 (2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright, G.: Total Rehabilitation. Little, Brown, Boston (1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss, D.: Biopsychosocial issues in sexuality with the neurologically impaired patient. Sex. Disabil. 9, 49–67 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kothari, S.: Prognosis after severe TBI: a practical, evidence abase approach. In: Zalsler, N.D., Katz, D.I., Zafonte, R.D. (eds) Brain Injury Medicine, chapter 14, pp. 169–199. Demos 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masters, W.H., Johnson, V.E.: Human Sexual Inadequacy. Little Brown, Boston (1970).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, W., Kempton, W.: Sexual Education and Counseling of Special Groups, pp. 244–231. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Apfelbaum, B.: The myth of the surrogate. J. Sex Res. 13, 234–249 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aloni, R., Katz, S.: Sexuality Difficulties after Traumatic Brain Injury and Ways to Deal with It, pp. 14–19. Charles C Thomas Pub. LTD., Springfield, Illinois USA (2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teasadale, G., Jennet, B.: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2, 81–84 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davis, D., Kolton-Schneider, L.: Ramifications of traumatic brain injury for sexuality. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 5, 31–37 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cole, M.: Sex therapy—a critical appraisal. Br. J. Psychiatry 147, 337–351 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oksenberg, A., Arons, E., Sazbon, L., Mizrahi, A., Radwan, H.: Sleep-related erections in vegetative state patients. Sleep 23, 953–957 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sexual Private ClinicTel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Rehabilitation Ward, Rehabilitation MedicineAlyn, Rehabilitation Pediatric Center, Rehabilitation MedicineJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBar Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations