Sexuality and Disability

, 23:227 | Cite as

“I Thought I was Less Worthy”: Low Sexual and Body Esteem and Increased Vulnerability to Intimate Partner Abuse in Women with Physical Disabilities

Article

Abstract

Several studies have documented disproportionately low sexual and body esteem in women with high degrees of physical impairment. Moreover, other studies have begun to examine the problem of intimate partner and other forms of abuse in women with physical disabilities. In this article we examine the link between low sexual and body esteem and intimate partner abuse in women with physical disabilities based on findings obtained from an in-depth qualitative study. Findings indicate that women with high degrees of physical impairment are more likely to perceive themselves as sexually inadequate and unattractive than women with mild impairment. These negative perceptions, when combined with a strong desire to be partnered, increased women’s vulnerability to getting into and staying in abusive relationships over time. Major themes presented in the article include: societal devaluation, low sexual and body esteem, preference for non-disabled men, desire to be partnered, and relationship decision-making. We depict the relationships between each of these themes in a simple model to further aid the reader’s understanding.

Keywords

intimate partner violence sexual esteem body esteem women with physical disabilities 

References

  1. Mayers, K, Heller, D, Heller, J. 2003Damaged sexual self-esteem: a kind of disabilitySex Disabil.21269282Google Scholar
  2. Mayer, J, Eisenberg, M. 1988Mental representation of the body: stability and change in response to illness and disabilityRehabilit Psychol.33155171Google Scholar
  3. McCabe, M, Taleporos, G. 2003Sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual behavior among people with physical disabilityArch Sex Behav.32359369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Taleporos, G, McCabe, M. 2002Development and validation of the physical disability sexual and body esteem scaleSex Disabil.20159176Google Scholar
  5. Taleporos, G, McCabe, M. 2001The impact of physical disability on body esteemSex Disabil.19293308Google Scholar
  6. Taleporos, G, McCabe, M. 2002The impact of sexual esteem,body esteem, and sexual satisfaction on psychological well-being in people with physical disabilitySex Disabil.20177183Google Scholar
  7. Taleporos, G, McCabe, M. 2001Physical disability and sexual esteemSex Disabil.19131148Google Scholar
  8. Taleporos, G, McCabe, M. 2003Relationships, sexuality and adjustment among people with physical disabilitySex Relationship Therapy.1856Google Scholar
  9. Benrud-Larson, L, Heinberg, L, Boling, C, Reed, J, White, B, Wigley, F, Haythornthwaite, J. 2003Body image dissatisfaction among women with scleroderma: extent and relationship to psychosocial functionHealth Psychol.22130139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kettl, P, Zarefoss, S. 1991Female sexuality after spinal cord injurySex Disabil.9287295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassouneh-Phillips, D, McNeff, E. 2004Understanding and defining care-related violence against women with spinal cord injuryJ Spinal Cord Injury Nurs.217581Google Scholar
  12. Gill C: Dating and relationship issues. In Women with Physical Disabilities – Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-being, Krotoski M, Nosek M, Turk M. (eds.) Baltimore: Paul Brooks, 1996, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
  13. Rintala, D, Howland, C, Nosek, M, Bennett, J, Young, M, Foley, C, RossiC Chanpong, G. 1997Dating issues for women with physical disabilitiesSex Disabil.15219242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Basson, R. 1998Sexual health of women with disabilitiesCan Med J.159359362Google Scholar
  15. Chance, R. 2002To love and be loved: sexuality and people with physical disabilitiesJ Psychol Theol.30195208Google Scholar
  16. Nosek, M, Rintala, D, Young, M, Howland, C, Foley, C, Rossi, C, Chanpong, G. 1996Sexual functioning among women with physical disabilitiesArch Phys Med Rehabilit.77107115Google Scholar
  17. Vansteenwegen, A, Jans, I, Revell, A. 2003Sexual experience of women with a physical disability: a comparative studySex Disabil.21283290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawrence, B. 1991Self concept formation and physical handicap: some educational implications for integrationDisabil, Handicap Soc.6139146Google Scholar
  19. Wendell, S. 1996The Rejected Body – Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability.RoutledgeNew York.Google Scholar
  20. Jans L, Stoddard S: Chartbook on Women and Disability in the United States. An Info-use Report. Washington DC: National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. Curry, MA, Hassouneh-Phillips, D, Johnston-Silverberg, A. 2001Abuse of women with disabilities: an ecological model and reviewViolence Against Women – An Int Interdisciplin J.76079Google Scholar
  22. Hassouneh-Phillips, D, Curry, MA. 2002Abuse of women with disabilities: state of the scienceRehabilit Counsel Bull.4596104Google Scholar
  23. Young, E, Nosek, M, Howland, C, Changpon, G, Rintala, D. 1997Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilitiesArch Phys Med Rehabilit Special Issue.78S34S38Google Scholar
  24. Nosek M, Howland C, Rintala D, Young E, Changpon G: National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities: Final Report. Houston, TX: Center for Research on Women with Disabilities, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Powers, L, Curry, MA, Oschwald, M, Saxton, M, Eckels, K. 2002Barriers and strategies in addressing abuse: a survey of disabled women’s experiencesJ Rehabilitat.68413Google Scholar
  26. Milberger, S, Israel, N, LeRoy, B, Martin, A, Potter, L, Patchak-Schuster, P. 2003Violence against women with physical disabilitiesViolence Vict.18581591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Riddington J: “Beating the Odds”: Violence and Women with Disabilities (position paper 2). Vancouver, B.C.: DisAbled Women’s Network of Canada, 1989.Google Scholar
  28. Berkeley Planning Associates. Priorities for future research: results of BPA’s Delphi survey of disabled women. Oakland, California: Berkeley Planning Associates, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. Nosek, M, Foley, C, Hughes, R, Howland, C. 2001Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilitiesSex Disabil.19177189Google Scholar
  30. Mertens D: Mixed methods and the politics of human research: the transformative-emancipatory perspective. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. (eds.) Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003, pp. 135–164.Google Scholar
  31. Seidman, I. 1991Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social SciencesTeachers College PressNew York.Google Scholar
  32. Benner P: The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring, and Ethics in Health and Illness, Benner P. (ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994, pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
  33. QSR Ltd. NVivo 2.0. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, B, Ulrich, Y, Bullock, L, Campbell, D, Cambell, J, King, C, Laudenburger, K, McFarlane, J, Ryan, J, Sheridan, D, Smith-McKenna, L, Torres, S. 1990A protocol of research on abuse of womenNurs Res.39248250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Creswell J: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. Lincoln, Y, Guba, E. 1985Naturalistic InquiryThousand OaksSage.Google Scholar
  37. Tilley, C. 1996Sexuality in women with physical disabilities: a social justice or health issue?Sex Disabil.14139151Google Scholar
  38. Campbell J: Making the health care system an empowerment zone for battered women: health consequences, policy recommendations, introduction, and overview. In Empowering Survivors of Abuse: Health Care for Battered Women and Their Children, Campbell J, (ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998, pp.3–22.Google Scholar
  39. Campbell, JC, Webster, D, Koziol-McLain, J, Block, C, Campbell, D, Curry, MA, Gary, F, Glass, N, McFarlane, J, Sachs, C, Sharps, P, Ulrich, Y, Wilt, SA, Manganello, J, Xu, X, Schollenberger, J, Frye, V, Laughon, K. 2003Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control studyAm J Public Health.9310891097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Cunradi, CB, Caetano, R, Schafer, J. 2002Alcohol-related problems, drug use, and male intimate partner violence severity among US couplesAlcoholism: Clin Exp Res.26493500Google Scholar
  41. Stark, A, Flitcraft, E. 1995Killing the beast within: woman battering and female suicidalityInt J Health Serv.254364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sutherland C, Bybee D, Sullivan C: The long-term effects of battering on women’s health. World Health Res Gen Behav Pol, 1998.Google Scholar
  43. Walton-Moss, B, Morrison, C, Yeo, T, Woodruff, K, Woods, N, Campbell, JC, Kub, J, Dennison, C, McCaul, M. 2003Interrelationships of violence and psychiatric symptoms in women with substance use disordersJ Addict Nurs.14193200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, CG, Barnett, M, Nikunen, L, Schultz, C, Randolph-Elgin, T, Mendez, CM. 1997Lifetime prevalences of nine commonpsychiatric/personality disorders in female domestic abuse survivorsJ Nerv Mental Dis.185645647Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of NursingOregon Health Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Regional Research Institute Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.School of NursingOregon Health Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations