Juvenile Sex Offenders: A Case Against the Legal and Clinical Status Quo



The past two decades have seen a movement toward harsher legal sanctions and lengthy, restrictive treatment programs for sex offenders. This has not only been the case for adults, but also for juveniles who commit sex offenses. The increased length and severity of legal and clinical interventions for juvenile sex offenders appear to have resulted from three false assumptions: (1) there is an epidemic of juvenile offending, including juvenile sex offending; (2) juvenile sex offenders have more in common with adult sex offenders than with other juvenile delinquents; and (3) in the absence of sex offender-specific treatment, juvenile sex offenders are at exceptionally high risk of reoffending. The available data do not support any of the above assumptions; however, these assumptions continue to influence the treatment and legal interventions applied to juvenile sex offenders and contributed to the application of adult interventions to juvenile sex offending. In so doing, these legal and clinical interventions fail to consider the unique developmental factors that characterize adolescence, and thus may be ineffective or worse. Fortunately, a paradigm shift that acknowledges these developmental factors appears to be emerging in clinical areas of intervention, although this trend does not appear as prevalent in legal sanctions.

Key Words

juvenile sex offenders treatment registration community notification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abel, G. G. (2000). The importance of meeting research standards: A reply to Fischer and Smith’s articles on the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest®. Letter to the editor. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 155–161.Google Scholar
  2. Ageton, S. S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, M. A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101–116.Google Scholar
  4. Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime (Version 4.0). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, M., & Hughes, J. N. (1999). First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 99–115.Google Scholar
  6. Awad, G. A., & Saunders, E. B. (1989). Adolescent child molesters: Clinical observations. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 19, 195–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbaree, H. E., & Cortoni, F. A. (1993). Treatment of the juvenile sex offender within the criminal justice and mental health systems. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 243–263. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, J. V. (1990). Treating adolescent sexual offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 362–365.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, J. V., & Hicks, S. J. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Characteristics, interventions, and policy issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 397–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, J. V., & Hunter, J. A. (1997). Understanding and treating child and adolescent sexual offenders. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 177–197.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, J. V., & Kaplan, M. S. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of the juvenile sex offender. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 264–277). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bischof, G. P., Stith, S. M., & Whitney, M. L. (1995). Family environments of juvenile sex offenders and other delinquents. Adolescence, 30, 157–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Blaske, D. M., Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., & Mann, B. J. (1989). Individual, family, and peer characteristics of juvenile sex offenders and assaultive offenders. Developmental Psychology, 25, 846–855.Google Scholar
  14. Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105–113.Google Scholar
  15. Borduin, C. M., & Schaeffer, C. M. (2002). Multisystemic treatment of juvenile sex offenders: A progress report. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13, 25–42.Google Scholar
  16. Bremer, J. F. (1992). Serious juvenile sex offenders: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 326–332.Google Scholar
  17. Burton, D. L., & Smith-Darden, J. (2001). North American Survey of Sexual Abusers Treatment and Models Summary Data 2000. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society FoundationGoogle Scholar
  18. Burton, D. L., Smith-Darden, J. P., Levins, J., Fiske, J. A., and Freeman-Longo, R. E. (2000). 1996 Nationwide Survey: A survey of treatment programs and models serving children with sexual behavior problems, juvenile sex offenders, and adult sex offenders. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, S. M., & Seto, M. C. (2002). Distinguishing two types of juvenile sex offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 83–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Caldwell, M. F. (2002). What we do not know about juvenile sexual reoffense risk. Child Maltreatment, 7, 291–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2001). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760.Google Scholar
  22. Chaffin, M. (1998). Editor’s introduction: “Don’t shoot, we’re your children.” Have we gone too far in our response to adolescent sexual abusers and children with sexual problems? Child Maltreatment, 3, 314–316.Google Scholar
  23. Chaffin, M., Letourneau, E., & Silovsky, J. F. (2002). Adults, adolescents, and children who sexually abuse children: A developmental perspective. J. E. B. Myers, Berliner, L. (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed., pp. 205–232). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Daleiden, E. L., Kaufman, K. L., Hilliker, D. R., & O’Neil, J. N. (1998). The sexual histories and fantasies of youthful males: A comparison of sexual offending, nonsexual offending, and nonoffending groups. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 195–209.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, B. (2002). Juvenile sex offenders: Does treatment work? The Charleston City Paper, August 14, 8–9.Google Scholar
  26. DesLauriers, A. T., & Gardner, J. (1999). The sexual predator treatment program of Kansas. In A. Schlank & F. Cohen (Eds.). The sexual predator: Law, policy, evaluation and treatment (Chapt. 11). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dishion, T. J ., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.Google Scholar
  29. Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination–The American Society of Criminology 1993 Presidential Address. Criminology, 32, 1–21.Google Scholar
  30. Elliott, D. S. (1998). Blueprints for violence prevention (Series Ed.). University of Colorado, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. Boulder, CO: Blueprints.Google Scholar
  31. Fehrenbach, P. A., Smith, W., Monastersky, C., & Deisher, R. W. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Offender and offense characteristics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 225–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Finkelhor, D. (1995). “The backlash” in sociological perspective. The APSAC Advisor, 8(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Finkelhor, D. (2002). Advances in the reduction of incidence and prevalence. Plenary session at the 21st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. October 2–5. Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  34. Finkelhor, D. (2003). Sham or champagne: The controversial decline in sexual abuse cases. Guest speaker at the 17th Annual San Diego Conference on Child and Family Maltreatment. February 3–7. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. M. (2004). Explanations for the decline in child sexual abuse cases. Juvenile Justice Bulletin (January, 2004). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  36. Ford, M. E., & Linney, J. A. (1995). Comparative analysis of juvenile sex offenders, violent nonsexual offenders, and status offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 56–70.Google Scholar
  37. Freeman-Longo, R., Bird, S. W., & Fiske, J. (1995). 1994 nationwide survey of treatment programs and models. Brandon, VT: Safer Society.Google Scholar
  38. Garfinkle, E. (2003). Coming of age in America: The misapplication of sex-offender registries and community-notification laws to juveniles. California Law Review, 91, 163–208.Google Scholar
  39. Graham, F., Richardson, G., & Bhate, S. R. (1998). Development of a service for sexually abusive adolescents in the Northeast of England. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 367–382). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Graves, R. B; Openshaw, D. K., Ascione, F. R., & Ericksen, S. L. (1996). Demographic and parental characteristics of youthful sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 300–317.Google Scholar
  41. Gray, A. S., & Pithers, W. D. (1993). Relapse prevention with sexually aggressive adolescents and children: Expanding treatment and supervision. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 289–319). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., O’Shaughnessy, R., & Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and recidivism in juvenile sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 427–449.Google Scholar
  43. Griffin, P., Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  44. Guarino-Ghezzi, S., & Kimball, L. M. (1998). Juvenile sex offenders in treatment. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  45. Hagan, M., King, R., & Patros, R. (1994). The efficacy of a serious sex offenders treatment program for adolescent rapists upon return to the community. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 141–150.Google Scholar
  46. Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,672 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046–1062.Google Scholar
  47. Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194.Google Scholar
  49. Hayes, H. D. (1997). Using integrated theory to explain the movement into juvenile delinquency. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 161–184.Google Scholar
  50. Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  51. Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Huizinga, D. (1995). Developmental sequences in delinquency: Dynamic typologies. In L. J. Crockett & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Pathways through adolescence. Individual development in relation to social contexts (pp. 15–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Hunter, J. A., Gilbertson, S. A., Vedros, D., & Morton, M. (2004). Strengthening community-based programming for juvenile sex offenders: Key concepts and paradigm shifts. Child Maltreatment, 9, 177–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hunter, J. A., Figueredo, A. J., Malamuth, N. M., & Becker, J. V. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Toward the development of a typology. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 27–48.Google Scholar
  55. Hunter, J. A., & Santos, D. R. (1990). The use of specialized cognitive-behavioral therapies in the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 239–247.Google Scholar
  56. Jacobs, W. L., Kennedy, W. A., & Meyer, J. B. (1997). Juvenile delinquents: A between-group comparison study of sexual and nonsexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 201–217.Google Scholar
  57. Kenny, D. T., Keogh, T., & Seidler, K. (2001). Predictors of recidivism in Australian juvenile sex offenders: Implications for treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 131–148.Google Scholar
  58. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1993). Exploring characteristics of classifying juvenile sex offenders. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 45–83). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  59. Knopp, F. H., Freeman-Longo, R., & Lane, S. L. (1997). Program development. G. D. Ryan, & S. L. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (pp. 183–200). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Kuban, M., Barbaree, H. E., & Blanchard, R. (1999). A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: Response magnitude and method agreement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 345–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lab, S. P., Shields, G., & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sex offender treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 543–553.Google Scholar
  62. Letourneau, E. J. (2003, August). Effectiveness trial: MST with juvenile sex offenders. In C. Borduin (Chair), MST and Juvenile Sex Offenders. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  63. Letourneau, E. J. (2004). A comment on the First Report [Letter to the editor]. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 77–82.Google Scholar
  64. Lieb, R. (1996). Community notification laws: A step toward more effective solutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 298–300.Google Scholar
  65. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Loeber, R., Keenan, K., & Zhang, Q. (1997). Boys’ experimentation and persistence in developmental pathways toward serious delinquency. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 6, 321–357.Google Scholar
  67. Marshall, W. L., & Eccles, A. (1993). Pavlovian conditioning processes in juvenile sex offenders. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 118–142). New York: The Guilford.Google Scholar
  68. Menard, S., Elliott, D. S., & Wofford, S. (1993). Social control theories in developmental perspective. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 2, 69–87.Google Scholar
  69. Milloy, C. D. (1994). A comparative study of juvenile sex offenders and nonsex offenders. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  70. Miner, M. H., & Munns, R. (in press). Isolation and normlessness: Attitudinal comparisons of juvenile sex offenders, juvenile offenders, and non delinquents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.Google Scholar
  71. Miranda, A. O., & Corcoran, C. L. (2000). Comparison of perpetration characteristics between male juvenile and adult sexual offenders: Preliminary results. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 179–188.Google Scholar
  72. Müller, U., Overton, W. F., & Reene, K. (2001). Development of conditional reasoning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 27–49.Google Scholar
  73. National Adolescent Perpetrator Network. (1993). The revised report from the National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 44(4), 1–155.Google Scholar
  74. National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse. (1999). Child abuse and neglect state statutes elements: Investigations (N. 17: Sex Offender Registration). Alexandria, VA. Retrieved April 10, 2002, from http://www.ndaa-apri.org
  75. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1999). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research based guide. Rockville, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  76. National Organization for the Treatment of Abusers. (n.d.). Strengthening the Sex Offenders Act. Retrieved September 26, 2004, from http://www.nota.co.uk (see the “news” section).
  77. New Hope Treatment Centers. (n.d.). Treatment philosophy. Retrieved September 26, 2004, from http://www.newhopetreatment.com (see the “residential facilities” section).
  78. O’Donohue, W. T., & Letourneau, E. J. (1992). A review of the psychometric properties of the penile tumescence assessment of child molesters. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14, 123–175.Google Scholar
  79. Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359–394.Google Scholar
  80. Piaget, J. (1972). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.Google Scholar
  81. Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2001). Juvenile sex offender assessment protocol: Manual. Bridgewater, MA: Justice Research Institute.Google Scholar
  82. Rogers, C. M., & Terry, T. (1984). Clinical interventions with boy victims of sexual abuse. In I. Stuart & J. Greer (Eds.), Victims of sexual aggression (pp. 91–104). New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  83. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1987). Normlessness, powerlessness, and trouble with the law. Criminology, 25, 257–278.Google Scholar
  84. Ryan, G., Lane, S., Davis, J., & Isaac, C. (1987). Juvenile sex offenders: Development and correction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 385–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Schram, D. D., & Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved October 15, 2044, from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov (use retrieval code #95-10-1101).
  86. Schram, D. D., Milloy, C. D., & Rowe, W. E. (1991). Juvenile sex offenders: A follow-up study of reoffense behavior. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  87. Schwartz, B. K. (1992). Effective treatment techniques for sex offenders. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 315–319.Google Scholar
  88. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among juvenile sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Shapiro, F. (1998, April). The big picture of sex offenders and public policy. Paper presented at the Bureau of Justice Statistics National Conference on Sex Offender Registries. Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://www.ojp.usdog.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/ncsor.txt
  91. Smets, A. C., & Cebula, C. M. (1987). A group treatment program for juvenile sex offenders: Five steps toward resolution. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 247–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, G., & Fischer, L. (1999). Assessment of juvenile sex offenders: Reliability and validity of the Abel Assessment for interest in paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 207–216.Google Scholar
  93. Sousa, C. A. (1999). Teen dating violence: The hidden epidemic. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37, 356–374.Google Scholar
  94. Tarolla, S. M., Wagner, E. F., Rabinowitz, J., & Tubman, J. G. (2002). Understanding and treating juvenile offenders: A review of current knowledge and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 125–143.Google Scholar
  95. Thomas, C. R., Holzer, C. E., & Wall, J. (2002). The Island Youth Programs: Community interventions for reducing youth violence and delinquency. In L. T. Flaherty (Ed.), Adolescent psychiatry: Developmental and clinical studies. Vol. 26; Annals of the American society for adolescent psychiatry (pp. 125–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  96. Triplett, R., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1994). Deterrence or labeling: the effects of informal sanctions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 43–64.Google Scholar
  97. Trivits, L. C., & Reppucci, N. D. (2002). Application of Megan’s Law to juveniles. American Psychologist, 57, 690–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Worling, J. R. (1998). Adolescent sexual offender treatment at the SAFE-T Program. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 353–365). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  99. Worling, J. R. (2004). The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 235–254.Google Scholar
  100. Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (1998). The adolescent sexual offender project: A 10-year follow-up study. SAFE-T Program (Sexual Abuse: Family Education and Treatment). Toronto, ON: Thistletown Regional Centre for Children and Adolescents and Probation and Community Services, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.Google Scholar
  101. Worling, R., R., & Curwen, T. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 965–982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Worling, J. R. & Curwen, T. (2001). The “ERASOR” estimate of risk of adolescent sexual offence recidivism (Version 2.0). Toronto, ON: Thistletown Regional Centre for Children & Adolescents & Probation and Community Services, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.Google Scholar
  103. Worling, J. R., & Långström, N. (2003). Assessment of criminal recidivism risk with adolescents who have offended sexually. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 4, 341–362.Google Scholar
  104. Zimring, F. E. (2004). An American travesty: Legal responses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family Services Research CenterMedical University of South CarolinaCharleston
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations