Using altmetrics for assessing impact of highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index
With the rapid development of Internet technology, online academic communications are increasingly prevalent, the traditional ways of academic evaluation can’t comprehensively reflect the multi-dimensional impact of scientific publications, therefore altmetrics is widely concerned by scholars because of its objectivity, timeliness and openness. Based on Douban Reading platform, this paper uses descriptive statistical analysis, grouping analysis, correlation analysis and other statistical methods to conduct the altmetrics evaluation of 1000 highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index. The results show that there is a weak correlation between citations and altmetrics indicators, suggesting that they reflect different aspects of books’ impact and they are complementary in the academic evaluation. What’s more, altmetrics indicators are different on discipline and year, the more applicable the discipline is, the higher the values of altmetrics indicators are. Meanwhile, compared with old books, new books published in recent years have an advantage in the altmetrics evaluation.
KeywordsAltmetrics Impact evaluation Chinese academic books Academic evaluation Chinese Book Citation Index
This research is financially supported by research Grants from the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 18FTQ005).
- Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., Muhuri, P.K. & Mayr, P. (2019). Disciplinary Variations in Altmetric Coverage of Scholarly Articles. In Proceedings in 17th international conference on scientometrics & informetrics (ISSI), September 2019, Rome, Italy, (pp. 1870–1881).Google Scholar
- Han, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, W., & Liu, X. (2018). Analysis of altmetrics indicators for academic books. Library and Information Service, 62(14), 91–97.Google Scholar
- He, J., & Cai, R. (2016). Research on evaluation system of Chinese books. Journal of Academic Library, 34(3), 51–58+15.Google Scholar
- Lei, S., & Lv, X. (2017). Research on the impact evaluation of academic books from the perspective of Altmetrics. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),38(6), 225–231.Google Scholar
- Li, M., & Chen, M. (2018). Exploration of hierarchical framework of altmetrics evaluation indicators for academic books. Journal of Modern Information,38(5), 106–109.Google Scholar
- Li, M., & Chen, M. (2019). Analysis of advantages, system and difficulties of Altmetrics evaluation for Chinese academic books. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),40(2), 236–240.Google Scholar
- Lin, X. (2016). Construction of academic impact evaluation system of electronic books based on altmetrics: Taking Springer electronic books as an example. Publishing Research,4, 85–89.Google Scholar
- Ma, N., & Song, Z. (2019). Research on impact evaluation of electronic books in mathematics based on Bookmetrix. Library Journal,38(3), 72–79.Google Scholar
- Xiong, X., Gao, F., & Guo, L. (2016). Discussion on evaluation methods of academic impact of foreign e-books: Comparison of examples based on BKCI, Scopus Article Metrics and Bookmetrix. Journal of Modern Information,36(10), 118–122.Google Scholar
- Yao, L., & Chen, Z. (2016). Research on impact evaluation system of national library of achievements in philosophy and social sciences. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),37(6), 232–236.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Yuan, J., Su, C., Ma, Z., Liu, N., et al. (2015). On the construction of academic impact evaluation system of Chinese science and technology books from multi-dimensional perspective. Library and Information Service,59(7), 69–76.Google Scholar