Advertisement

The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research

  • R. BjørkEmail author
Article

Abstract

We use the Nobel Foundations Scientific Background material to determine which journals have published Nobel Prize-awarded papers in physics since 1995. Analysing all references in the Nobel Prize Scientific Background material reveals that the journal Physical Review Letters published 28.5% of the Nobel Prize-awarded papers. It is followed by the Astrophysical journal, which accounts for 11.2%, Science, accounting 5.6% and Nature, accounting 4.7%. This is contrary to the journals respective Impact Factors, where Physical Review Letters and the Astrophysical Journal have much lower impact factors than Nature and Science. If works cited for background by the Nobel Foundation in the Scientific Background material are included in the analysis, the most referenced journal is still Physical Review Letters, now followed by Physical Review. The conclusion is that the most ground-breaking scientific work in physics is not necessarily published in the journals with the highest Impact Factor.

Keywords

Nobel Prize Physics Citations Journals Impact Factor 

References

  1. Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415, 726–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baffes, J., & Vamvakidis, A. (2011). Are you too young for the Nobel Prize? Research Policy, 40, 1345–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørk, R. (2019a). The age at which Noble Prize research is conducted. Scientometrics, 119, 931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjørk, R. (2019b). Number of citations to individual journals in the Nobel Prize Scientific Background material in physics.  https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.8057102.
  5. Campbell, P. (2008). Escape from the impact factor. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8, 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbone, P. (2014). Impact factor and research quality. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 17, 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, H. F., Gleeson, L., & Torgler, B. (2014). Awards before and after the Nobel Prize: A Matthew effect and/or a ticket to one’s own funeral? Research Evaluation, 23, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, H. F., Önder, A. S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception? Scientometrics, 105, 2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2013). Science prizes: Time-lapsed awards for excellence. Nature, 500, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2015). The implications of educational and methodological background for the career success of Nobel laureates: an investigation of major awards. Scientometrics, 102, 847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 56, 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. PNAS, 108, 18910–18914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karazija, R., & Momkauskaitė, A. (2004). The Nobel prize in physics—Regularities and tendencies. Scientometrics, 61, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manniche, E., & Falk, G. (1957). Age and the Nobel prize. System Research, 2, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porta, M., Copete, J. L., Fernandez, E., Alguacil, J., & Murillo, J. (2003). Mixing journal, article, and author citations, and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor. Cadernos de saúde pública, 19, 1847–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schlagberger, E. M., Bornmann, L., & Bauer, J. (2016). At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prizewinning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014. Scientometrics, 109, 723–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the Nobel prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wagner, C. S., Horlings, E., Whetsell, T. A., Mattsson, P., & Nordqvist, K. (2015). Do nobel laureates create prize-winning networks? An analysis of collaborative research in physiology or medicine. PLoS ONE, 10, e0134164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy Conversion and StorageTechnical University of Denmark - DTURoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations