Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 1209–1223 | Cite as

Publication modalities ‘article in press’ and ‘open access’ in relation to journal average citation

  • Sara M. González-BetancorEmail author
  • Pablo Dorta-González
Article

Abstract

There has been a generalization in the use of two publication practices by scientific journals during the past decade: (1) ‘article in press’ or early view, which allows access to the accepted paper before its formal publication in an issue; (2) ‘open access’, which allows readers to obtain it freely and free of charge. This paper studies the influence of both publication modalities on the average impact of the journal and its evolution over time. It tries to identify the separate effect of access on citation into two major parts: early view and selection effect, managing to provide some evidence of the positive effect of both. Scopus is used as the database and CiteScore as the measure of journal impact. The prevalence of both publication modalities is quantified. Differences in the average impact factor of group of journals, according to their publication modalities, are tested. The evolution over time of the citation influence, from 2011 to 2016, is also analysed. Finally, a linear regression to explain the correlation of these publication practices with the CiteScore in 2016, in a ceteris paribus context, is estimated. Our main findings show evidence of a positive correlation between average journal impact and advancing the publication of accepted articles, moreover this correlation increases over time. The open access modality, in a ceteris paribus context, also correlates positively with average journal impact.

Keywords

Early view In-press articles Online first Open access Citation advantage CiteScore Impact factor 

References

  1. Al, U., & Soydal, I. (2017). Publication lag and early view effects in information science journals. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(2), 118–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves-Silva, E., Porto, A. C. F., Firmino, C., Silva, H. V., Becker, I., Resende, L., et al. (2016). Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals? Scientometrics, 108(3), 1445–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337(7665), 343–345.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, P. M., & Walters, W. H. (2011). The impact of free access to the scientific literature: A review of recent research. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(3), 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2013). Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics, 95(2), 645–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorta-González, P., Dorta-González, M. I., & Suárez-Vega, R. (2015). An approach to the author citation potential: Measures of scientific performance which are invariant across scientific fields. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1467–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorta-González, P., González-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2017). Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: An analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009–2014. Scientometrics, 112(2), 877–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorta-González, P., & Santana-Jiménez, Y. (2018). Prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the Scopus database. Research Evaluation, 27(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Echeverría, M., Stuart, D., & Cordón-García, J.-A. (2017). The influence of online posting dates on the bibliometric indicators of scientific articles. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(3), e183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaule, P., & Maystre, N. (2011). Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy, 40(10), 1332–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joint, N. (2009). The Antaeus column: Does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian’s perspective. Library Review, 58(7), 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P., & Turk, G. (2014). Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering. Scientometrics, 98(1033), 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., et al. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Y., Wu, C., Yan, E., & Li, K. (2018). Will open access increase journal CiteScores? An empirical investigation over multiple disciplines. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (1998). Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKiernan, E., Bourne, P., Brown, C., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., et al. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. elife, 5, e16800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of open access on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., Akil, A., et al. (2016). Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., et al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prosser, D. (2003). Institutional repositories and open access: The future of scholarly communication. Information Services and Use, 23(2), 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shi, D., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., & Li, J. (2017). A journal’s impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 780–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. F1000 Research, 5, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tort, A. B. L., Targino, Z. H., & Amaral, O. B. (2012). Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e53374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu, G., Wang, X.-H., & Yu, D.-R. (2005). The influence of publication delays on impact factors. Scientometrics, 64(2), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yule, G. U. (1903). Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika, 2(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y GestiónUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain
  2. 2.TiDES Research InstituteUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain

Personalised recommendations