Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 1439–1460 | Cite as

The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers

  • Kaile Gong
  • Juan Xie
  • Ying Cheng
  • Vincent Larivière
  • Cassidy R. SugimotoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Contemporary scientific exchanges are international, yet language continues to be a persistent barrier to scientific communication, particularly for non-native English-speaking scholars. Since the ability to absorb knowledge has a strong impact on how researchers create new scientific knowledge, comprehensive access to and understanding of both domestic and international scientific publications is essential for scientific performance. This study explores the effect of absorbed knowledge on research impact by analyzing the relationship between the language diversity of cited references and the number of citations received by the citing paper. Chinese social sciences are taken as the research object, and the data, 950,302 papers published between 1998 and 2013 with 8,151,327 cited references, were collected from the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index. Results show that there is a stark increase in the consumption of foreign language material within the Chinese social science community, and English material accounts for the vast majority of this consumption. Papers with foreign language references receive significantly more citations than those without, and the citation advantage of these internationalized work holds when we control for characteristics of the citing papers, such as the discipline, prestige of journal, prestige of institution, and scientific collaboration. However, the citation advantage has decreased from 1998 to 2008, largely as an artifact of the increased number of papers citing foreign language material. After 2008, however, the decline of the citation advantage subsided and became relatively stable, which suggests that incorporating foreign language literature continues to increase scientific impact, even as the scientific community itself becomes increasingly international. However, internationalization is not without concerns: the work closes with a discussion of the potential problems associated with the lack of linguistic diversity in scientific communication.

Keywords

References Citations Social sciences China Globalization Lingua franca 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (No. 17BTQ014) and the China Scholarship Council. We’d like to thank Fansai Meng for collecting data and Yi Bu as well as Jing Yang for fruitful discussions and comments. We also appreciate two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.Google Scholar
  2. Amara, N., Landry, R., & Halilem, N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, 103(2), 489–530.Google Scholar
  3. Antoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29(2), 286–292.Google Scholar
  4. Biscaro, C., & Giupponi, C. (2014). Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99502.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099502.Google Scholar
  5. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2–72.Google Scholar
  6. Bornmann, L. (2016). Scientific revolution in scientometrics: The broadening of impact from citation to societal. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication (pp. 347–359). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.Google Scholar
  8. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2014). How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 175–180.Google Scholar
  9. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H. D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  10. Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., & Weber, E. (2002). Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2847–2850.Google Scholar
  11. Chakraborty, T., Kumar, S., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Towards a stratified learning approach to predict future citation counts. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, September 8–12, 2014, London, UK (pp. 351–360).Google Scholar
  12. Chen, C. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431–449.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, Y. (2016). The current status, problems and countermeasures of grading evaluation of academic journals of humanities and social sciences in China. Library Science Research & Work, 5, 5–13 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Cheng, N. (2009). Research on knowledge transfer based on citation. Doctoral dissertation, Wuhan University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  16. Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1055–1064.Google Scholar
  17. Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2013). Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics, 95(2), 645–672.Google Scholar
  18. Du, M. (2019). About Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. http://casseng.cssn.cn/about/about_cass/. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  19. Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e49476.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476.Google Scholar
  20. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.Google Scholar
  21. Gingras, Y., & Mosbah-Natanson, S. (2010). Les sciences sociales françaises entre ancrage local et visibilité internationale. European Journal of Sociology/Archives européennes de sociologie, 51(2), 305–321.Google Scholar
  22. Gong, K., Xie, J., Cheng, Y., & Meng, F. (2018). Internationalization of references in journal papers: An empirical study on library and information science. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 37(2), 151–160 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Gordin, M. D. (2015). Scientific Babel: How science was done before and after global English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2010). Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 891–900.Google Scholar
  25. He, X. (2008). An analysis of the internationalization of academic research in humanities and social sciences in China since the founding of PRC: Based on the quantitative analysis of SSCI and A&HCI (1956–2006). Dongyue Tribune, 29(3), 24–31 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  26. Institute for Chinese Social Science Research and Assessment of Nanjing University. (2016). Introduction of Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI). http://cssrac.nju.edu.cn/a/cpzx/zwshkxwsy/sjkjj/20160226/1141.html. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.
  27. Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C., & Nowotniak, R. (2017). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities in Flanders and Poland. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, October 16–20, 2017, Wuhan, China (pp. 95–104).Google Scholar
  28. Larivière, V. (2018). Le français, langue seconde? De l’évolution des lieux et langues de publication des chercheurs au Québec, en France et en Allemagne. Recherches Sociographiques, 59(3), 339–363.Google Scholar
  29. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332.Google Scholar
  30. Larivière, V., Gong, K., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). Citations strength begins at home. Nature, 564(7735), S70–S71.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, W. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from web of science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555–569.Google Scholar
  33. Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., McKinlay, R. J., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ, 336(7645), 655–657.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(4), 606–623.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2006). List of universities in “project 985”. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/200612/t20061206_128833.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  36. Miranda, R., & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2018). Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1015–1030.Google Scholar
  37. Montgomery, S. L. (2013). Does science need a global language?: English and the future of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mou, X., Gong, K., Xie, J., Cheng, Y., & Ke, Q. (2018). Contributing factors of citations: An empirical study of library and information science in China. Documentation, Information and Knowledge, 4, 43–52 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Nature Index. (2018). Institution outputs. https://www.natureindex.com/institution-outputs/generate/All/global/All/score. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  40. National Science Foundation. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. Chapter 5. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/academic-research-and-development/outputs-of-s-e-research-publications#publication-output-by-u-s-sector. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.
  41. Nieminen, P., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., & Schumacher, M. (2006). The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 42.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-42.Google Scholar
  42. NobelPrize.org. (2018). Facts on the Nobel Prize in Literature. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/facts/facts-on-the-nobel-prize-in-literature/. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  43. Office of Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanjing University. (2017). Catalogue of leading journals in humanities and social sciences. http://skch.nju.edu.cn/regulation. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  44. Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739–764.Google Scholar
  45. Qiu, J., Zhao, R., & Dong, K. (2016). Scientometrics. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  46. Roth, C., Wu, J., & Lozano, S. (2012). Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 111–120.Google Scholar
  47. So, M., Kim, J., Choi, S., & Park, H. W. (2015). Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: Focused on non-quality factors. Quality & Quantity, 49(4), 1513–1530.Google Scholar
  48. Su, X., Deng, S., & Shen, S. (2014). The design and application value of the Chinese social science citation index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1567–1582.Google Scholar
  49. Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2018). Measuring research: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sugimoto, C. R., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D. S., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature, 550(7674), 29–31.Google Scholar
  51. Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225.Google Scholar
  52. Thelwall, M. (2016). Are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data? Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 454–470.Google Scholar
  53. Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2014). Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 963–971.Google Scholar
  54. van Wesel, M., Wyatt, S., & ten Haaf, J. (2014). What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1601–1615.Google Scholar
  55. Wang, B., Bu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). A quantitative exploration on reasons for citing papers from the perspective of cited authors. Scientometrics, 116(2), 675–687.Google Scholar
  56. Wang, H., Deng, S., & Su, X. (2016). A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1725–1759.Google Scholar
  57. Warren, J. P. (2014). The end of national sociological traditions? The fates of sociology in English Canada and French Quebec in a globalized field of science. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 50, 87–108.Google Scholar
  58. Xie, J., Cheng, Y., Sun, J., & Ke, Q. (2018). A study on citing behavior based on the theory of information use environment: A cited references analysis. Journal of Library Science in China, 44(5), 59–75 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  59. Yang, X., Gu, X., Wang, Y., Hu, G., & Tang, L. (2015). The Matthew effect in China’s science: Evidence from academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2089–2105.Google Scholar
  60. Yitzhaki, M. (1998). The ‘language preference’ in sociology: Measures of ‘language self-citation’, ‘relative own-language preference indicator’, and ‘mutual use of languages’. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 243–254.Google Scholar
  61. Yu, T., & Yu, G. (2014). Features of scientific papers and the relationships with their citation impact. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 19(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  62. Yu, T., Yu, G., Li, P. Y., & Wang, L. (2014). Citation impact prediction for scientific papers using stepwise regression analysis. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1233–1252.Google Scholar
  63. Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593–621.Google Scholar
  64. Zong, X., & Zhang, W. (2017). Establishing world-class universities in China: Deploying a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the net effects of project 985. Studies in Higher Education, 44(3), 417–431.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information ManagementNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Informatics, Computing, and EngineeringIndiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’informationUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations