Advertisement

Scientific production on mobile information literacy in higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2006–2017)

  • María Pinto
  • Rosaura Fernández-Pascual
  • David Caballero-Mariscal
  • Dora SalesEmail author
  • David Guerrero
  • Alejandro Uribe
Article

Abstract

This paper offers a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on Mobile Information Literacy in Higher Education published between 2006 and 2017, taking into account papers covered by Web of Science, Scopus, Library and Information Science Abstracts, Library and Information Science and Technology Abstract, and Education Resources Information Center. Bibliometrics, as an integral part of research evaluation methodology, helps us to identify the subject’s evolution over the period studied. In this research we aim to: (a) identify the most relevant journals that publish literature in this field, (b) calculate the authors’ average productivity and identify the most productive authors, and (c) discover the most significant trends in this academic field, through statistical and co-occurrence word analyses of the titles and the keywords used to index papers. The bibliometric results of this research provide a snapshot of the literature on Mobile Information Literacy that highlights the most relevant journals, authors, and trending keywords.

Keywords

Scientific production Mobile information literacy Higher education Bibliometric analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the R&D project “Innovation and training in the information competencies of university lecturers and students in the social sciences. Model for the development of programs in the mobile environment” (CSO2016-80147-R), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness.

References

  1. ACRL-ALA. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Association of College and Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association.Google Scholar
  2. Adell, J., & Castañeda, L. (2010). Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. In R. Roig Vila & M. Fiorucci (Ed.), Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativas. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas (pp. 19–30). Alcoy: Marfil–Rome: TRE Universita degli studi.Google Scholar
  3. Aharony, N. (2010). Information literacy in the professional literature: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Proceedings, 62(3), 261–282.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, M. (2017). Designing Online asynchronous information literacy instruction using the ADDIE Model. In T. Maddison & M. Kumaran (Eds.), Distributed learning pedagogy and technology in online information literacy instruction (pp. 69–91). London: Chandos Information Professional Series.Google Scholar
  5. Ally, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, S. A., & Mitchell, E. R. (2012). Life after TILT: Building an interactive information literacy tutorial. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6(3–4), 147–158.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R. L. (2014). Designing LibGuides as instructional tools for critical thinking and effective online learning. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 107–117.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, A. (2016). Active learning with interactive videos: Creating student-guided learning materials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3–4), 79–87.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, C. (2007). Technology: Ten years after TILT—New uses of technology to promote information literacy. Public Services Quarterly, 3, 257–267.Google Scholar
  10. Bhardwaj, R. K. (2017). Information literacy literature in the social sciences and humanities: A bibliometric study. Information and Learning Science, 118(1/2), 67–89.Google Scholar
  11. Brazuelo Grund, F., & Gallego Gil, D. J. (2014). Estado del mobile learning en España. Educar em Revista, (4). http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-40602014000800099&script=sci_abstract&tlng=es. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  12. Briz-Ponce, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). (Eds). Handbook of research on mobile devices and applications in higher education settings. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  13. Brunvand, A. (2008). Integrating library reference services in an online information literacy course: The internet navigator as a model. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 9(3–4), 159–177.Google Scholar
  14. Burkhardt, A., & Cohen, S. F. (2012). Turn your cell phones on. Mobile phone polling as a tool for teaching information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 6(2), 191.Google Scholar
  15. Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Benito, M., & Romo, J. (2010). iPLE network: An integrated e-Learning 2.0 architecture from a university’s perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 293–308.Google Scholar
  16. Chatterjee, P., & Nath, A. (2015). The future ICT education in India—A pilot study on the vision of ubiquitous learning in higher education. In S. C. Satapathy, et al. (Eds.), Information systems design and intelligent applications (pp. 599–609). New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, M., Coward, C., Rothschild, C., Reynal, L. D., Richter, B. (2017). Towards a mobile information literacy framework: Rethinking information literacy in a mobile era. In iConference 2017 proceedings. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/96782. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.
  18. Corrall, S., & Keates, J. (2011). The subject librarian and the virtual learning environment: A study of UK universities. Program, 45(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  19. Courtney, M., & Wilhoite-Mathews, S. (2015). From distance education to online learning: Practical approaches to information literacy instruction and collaborative learning in online environments. Journal of Library Administration, 55(4), 261–277.Google Scholar
  20. Cuthbertson, W., & Falcone, A. (2014). Elevating engagement and community in online courses. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  21. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  22. Dalal, H. A., & Lackie, R. J. (2014). What if you build it and they still won’t come? Addressing student awareness of resources and services with promotional videos. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 225–241.Google Scholar
  23. Daniel, D. (2015). Library research courses that follow universal design principles and best practices for online education of special needs students improve student learning experiences. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 69–71.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, M. G., & Smith, C. E. (2009). Virtually embedded: Library instruction within second life. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 3(3–4), 120–137.Google Scholar
  25. Day, S. (2015). Mobile information literacy curriculum. Technology & Social Change Group and the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/34803. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.
  26. Ebner, M., Schön, S., Taraghil, B., Drachsler, H., & Tsang, P. (2011). First steps towards an integrated personal learning environment at the university level. In R. Kwan, C. McNaught, P. Tsang, F. L. Wang, & K. C. Li (Eds.), Enhancing learning through technology: Education unplugged: mobile technologies and web 2.0 (pp. 22–36). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Fong, W. W. (2013). The trends in mobile learning. In: S. K. S. Cheun, J. Fong, W. Fong, F. L. Wang, & L. F. Kwok (Eds.), Hybrid learning and continuing education. ICHL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 301–312). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Fundación Telefónica. (2017). Sociedad digital en España 2017. Madrid/Barcelona: Fundación Telefónica. Editorial Ariel.Google Scholar
  29. Gallego Lema, V., Cristóbal, M., Alberto, J., Arribas Cubero, H., & Rubia Avi, B. (2016). Aprendizaje ubicuo: un proceso formativo en educación física en el medio natural. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 15(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  30. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.Google Scholar
  31. Glassman, J. A., & Worsham, D. M. (2017). Digital research notebook: A simple tool for reflective learning. Reference Services Review, 45(2), 179–200.Google Scholar
  32. Godwin, P. (2010). Information Literacy Gets Mobile. In G. Needham & M. Ally (Eds.), M-libraries 2: A virtual library in everyone´s pocket (pp. 206–213). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  33. Greenlee, P. (2014). Tutorials: Resource instruction for distance learners. The Christian Librarian, 57(2), 5.Google Scholar
  34. Greer, K., Hess, A. N., & Kraemer, E. W. (2016). The Librarian leading the machine: A reassessment of library instruction methods. College & Research Libraries, 77(3), 286–301.Google Scholar
  35. Gunn, M., & Kraemer, E. W. (2011). The agile teaching library: Models for integrating information. In S. Kelsey & K. Amant (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication: Issues and approaches in education: Issues and approaches in education. IGI Global: Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
  36. Gunn, M., & Miree, C. E. (2012). Business information literacy teaching at different academic levels: An exploration of skills and implications for instructional design. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(1), 18–34.Google Scholar
  37. Hahn, J. (2008). Mobile learning for the twenty-first century librarian. Reference Services Review, 36(3), 272–288.Google Scholar
  38. Havelka, S. (2013). Mobile information literacy: Supporting students’ research and information needs in a mobile world. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(3–4), 189–209.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2013.856366.Google Scholar
  39. Havelka, S., & Verbovetskaya, A. (2012). Mobile information literacy. Let’s use an app for that! C&RL news, January 2012. http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=le_pubs. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.
  40. Hemmig, W., Johnstone, B. T., & Montet, M. (2012). Create a sense of place for the mobile learner. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6(3–4), 312–322.Google Scholar
  41. Hess, A. N. (2015). Motivational design in information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 44–59.Google Scholar
  42. Hsieh, P. N., Chuang, T. M., & Wang, M. L. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the theses and dissertations on information literacy published in the United States and Taiwan. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications, 1, 337–348.Google Scholar
  43. Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2015). A review of models and frameworks for designing mobile learning experiences and environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 41(3), 1–22.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369–382.Google Scholar
  45. Humanante-Ramos, P., García-Peñalvo, F., & Conde-González, M. (2017). Entornos personales de aprendizaje móvil: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2). http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/17692. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  46. Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  47. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.Google Scholar
  48. Jacobs, W. N. (2017). Online Discussion in a hybrid information literacy credit course. Education Libraries, 30(2), 18–26.Google Scholar
  49. Johnson, M., Hollins, P., Wilson, S., & Liber, O. (2006). Towards a reference model for the personal learning environment. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), 23rd annual conference of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 385–389). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kingsawat, K., Kwiecien, K., & Tuamsuk, K. (2015). Components and factors in integrating information literacy instruction in elementary education using a virtual learning environment. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 25(1), 50–77.Google Scholar
  51. Kolle, S. R. (2017). Global research on information literacy: A bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2014. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 283–298.Google Scholar
  52. Kong, L. X., Hunter, S. L., & Lin, G. C. I. (2007). An advanced virtual program in engineering education for research and teaching excellence. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 35(2), 148–165.Google Scholar
  53. Kratochvil, J. (2014). Efficiency of e-Learning in an information literacy course for medical students at the Masaryk University. The Electronic Library, 32(3), 322–340.Google Scholar
  54. Kumar, R. (2016). Use of e-resources by the medical students of MM University, Ambala: A case study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 36(1), 10–16.Google Scholar
  55. Kumar, S., Ochoa, M., & Edwards, M. (2012). Considering information literacy skills and needs: Designing library instruction for the online learner. Communications in Information Literacy, 6(1), 91–116.Google Scholar
  56. Ladell-Thomas, J. (2012). Do-it-yourself information literacy: Self-directed learning at a distance. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6(3–4), 376–386.Google Scholar
  57. Majid, S., Chang, Y. K., Hnin, N. A., Ma, M. W. K., & San, Y. W. (2015). Analyzing publishing trends in information literacy literature: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 20(2), 51–66.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76–85.Google Scholar
  59. Mateus, J. C., Aran-Ramspott, S., & Masanet, M. J. (2017). Revisión de la literatura sobre dispositivos móviles en la universidad española. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2). http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/17710. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  60. Mery, Y., DeFrain, E., Kline, E., & Sult, L. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of tools for online database instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 70–81.Google Scholar
  61. Mery, Y., Newby, J., & Peng, K. (2012). Why one-shot information literacy sessions are not the future of instruction: A case for online credit courses. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 366–377.Google Scholar
  62. Mestre, L. S., Baures, L., Niedbala, M., Bishop, C., Cantrell, S., Perez, A., et al. (2011). Learning objects as tools for teaching information literacy online: A survey of librarian usage. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 236–252.Google Scholar
  63. Moghaddam, H. S., & Fard, E. M. (2013). Information literacy in distance education universities in Iran: A case study of‎ Payame Noor University. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 12(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  64. Mullins, K. (2017). Research plus™ mobile app: Information literacy “On the Go”. Reference Services Review, 45(1), 38–53.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2016-0020.Google Scholar
  65. Mune, C., Goldman, C., Higgins, S., Eby, L., Chan, E. K., & Crotty, L. (2015). Developing adaptable online information literacy modules for a learning management system. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1–2), 101–118.Google Scholar
  66. Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2014). Impact of learner’s characteristics and learning behaviour on learning performance during a fully online course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(4), 394–408.Google Scholar
  67. Panda, I., Maharana, B., & Chhatar, D. C. (2013). The journal of information literacy: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(3), 1–5.Google Scholar
  68. Park, M. K., & Kim, H. J. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of the literature on information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
  69. Peter, J., Leichner, N., Mayer, A. K., & Krampen, G. (2017). Making information literacy instruction more efficient by providing individual feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1110–1125.Google Scholar
  70. Pinto, M. (2015). Viewing and exploring the subject area of information literacy assessment in higher education (2000–2011). Scientometrics, 102, 227–245.Google Scholar
  71. Pinto, M., Escalona, M. I., & Pulgarín, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: A bibliometric study (1974–2011). Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071–1094.Google Scholar
  72. Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  73. Russell, P., Ryder, G., Kerins, G., & Phelan, M. (2013). Creating, sharing and reusing learning objects to enhance information literacy. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 60–79.Google Scholar
  74. Schmidt Hanbidge, A., Sanderson, N., & Tin, T. (2016). Information literacy on the go! adding mobile to an age old challenge. International Association for Development of the Information Society, Portugal. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED571443.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.
  75. Serin, O. (2012). Mobile learning perceptions of the prospective teachers (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Sampling). TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 222–233.Google Scholar
  76. Špiranec, S., & Banek Zorica, M. (2010). Information literacy 2.0: Hype or discourse refinement? Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 140–153.Google Scholar
  77. Sproles, C., Detmering, R., & Johnson, A. M. (2013). Trends in the literature on library instruction and information literacy, 2001–2010. Reference Services Review, 41(3), 395–412.Google Scholar
  78. Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 31(3), 268–286.Google Scholar
  79. Tallolli, S. B., & Mulla, K. R. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of journal of information literacy (2011–2015). ISST Journal of Advances In Librarianship, 7(2), 44–51.Google Scholar
  80. Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54–65.Google Scholar
  81. Taşkın Z., Doğan G., & Şencan İ. (2013) Analyzing the intellectual structure of world information literacy literature through citations and co-citations. In: Kurbanoğlu S., Grassian E., Mizrachi D., Catts R., Špiranec S. (Eds.), Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice. ECIL 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 54–60). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  82. Thornes, S. L. (2012). Creating an online tutorial to support information literacy and academic skills development. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(1), 81–95.Google Scholar
  83. Tomberg, V., Laanpere, M., Ley, T., & Normak, P. (2013). Sustaining teacher control in a blog-based Personal learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 109–133.Google Scholar
  84. Traxler, J. M. (2008). Use of Mobile Technology for Mobile Learning and Mobile Libraries in a Mobile Society. In G. Needham & M. Ally (Eds.), M-libraries: Libraries on the move to provide virtual access (pp. 47–55). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  85. Türker, M. A., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. eLearning Papers, 9, 1–15.Google Scholar
  86. Ukwoma, S. C., Iwundu, N. E., & Iwundu, I. E. (2016). Digital literacy skills possessed by students of UNN, implications for effective learning and performance: A study of the MTN Universities connect library. New Library World, 117(11/12), 702–720.Google Scholar
  87. Uribe-Tirado, A., & Alhuay-Quispe, J. (2017). Estudio métrico de ALFIN en Iberoamérica: de la bibliometría a las altmetrics. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(3). http://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/984/1518. Accessed 20 May 2018.
  88. Urs, S., Raghavan, K. S., Anuradha, K. T., & Harinarayana, N. S. (2013). A Bibliometric Study of World Research Output on Information Literacy in the Field of Library and Information Science during 1999-2013. In H. P. Shekar, H. Rajendra Babu, V. Sunitha & T. A. Mohan (Eds.), National conference on inspiring library services (NCILS-2013) (Vol. 1, pp.1–5). Tumkur, Karnataka: Sree Siddharta Education Society.Google Scholar
  89. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.Google Scholar
  90. Van Harmelen, M. (2006). Personal learning environments. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT’06). https://goo.gl/eD4voC. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  91. Vassilakaki, E. (2014). Mobile information services in libraries: A review of current trends in delivering information. Interlending & Document Supply, 42(4), 176–186.Google Scholar
  92. Virkus, S. (2006). Development of information-related competencies in European ODL institutions: Senior managers’ view. New Library World, 107(11/12), 467–480.Google Scholar
  93. Virkus, S. (2012). Information literacy from the policy and strategy perspective. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 4(1), 16–37.Google Scholar
  94. Wales, T., & Robertson, P. (2008). Captivating open university students with online literature search tutorials created using screen capture software. Program, 42(4), 365–381.Google Scholar
  95. Walsh, A. (2012a). Using mobile technology to deliver library services: A handbook. London: Facet—CILIP.Google Scholar
  96. Walsh, A. (2012b). Mobile information literacy: A preliminary outline of information behaviour in a mobile environment. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 56–69.Google Scholar
  97. Walters, K., Bolich, C., Duffy, D., Quinn, C., Walsh, K., & Connolly, S. (2015). Developing online tutorials to improve information literacy skills for second-year nursing students of University College Dublin. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 7–29.Google Scholar
  98. Washburn, A. (2009). Screencasting library tutorials for distance learners: A user evaluation. Indiana Libraries, 28(3), 49–57.Google Scholar
  99. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2006). Personal learning environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2), 27–38.Google Scholar
  100. Woodward, K. M. (2015). Students at the Center in emerging academic models: embedded information literacy and distance services in the University of Wisconsin System Flex Degree. Library Hi Tech News, 32(7), 12–15.Google Scholar
  101. Zipf, G. K. (1940). The generalized harmonic series as a fundamental principle of social organization. The Psychological Record, 4, 41–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Pinto
    • 1
  • Rosaura Fernández-Pascual
    • 2
  • David Caballero-Mariscal
    • 3
  • Dora Sales
    • 4
    Email author
  • David Guerrero
    • 5
  • Alejandro Uribe
    • 6
  1. 1.Faculty of Information ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Economic and Business SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Translation and CommunicationUniversity Jaume ICastellónSpain
  5. 5.Assessment, Quality and Study Programmes ServiceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  6. 6.Inter-American School of LibrarianshipUniversity of AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations