On the development of China’s leadership in international collaborations
This paper studies the relationship between leadership, team size, and citation impact in China’s international research output from 1980 to 2016, measured in terms of number of authors, institutions, countries, and citations. Distinction is here made between leading and non-leading Chinese international collaborations, which respectively refer to papers whose first or corresponding author is affiliated to a Chinese institution and papers co-authored by researchers from a Chinese institution but whose first and corresponding authors are not. Analysis at the individual, institutional, and country level show that while average team size by paper increases over the period, the main collaboration mode remains bilateral at the country level. We also observe a positive relationship between team size and research impact up to a certain point, but Chinese-led international collaborations tend to imply smaller teams and have lower impact than non-leading collaborations.
KeywordsCollaboration Team size China Research evaluation Citation analysis
Research for this article has been founded by the Wuhan University Scholarship Fund and Yu Gang-Song Xiao scholarship from Wuhan University, China, Québec-China Short-term research or professional development scholarships (3C), and China Scholarship Council (CSC). The authors also thank the Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies for providing the data.
Conceived and designed the experiments: WQ RYZ VL. Performed the experiments: WQ PM MSM. Analyzed the data: WQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WQ PM MSM RYZ VL. Wrote the paper: WQ PM MSM.
- Big Science: The 10 Most Ambitious Experiments in the Universe Today (n.d.). Popular Science. https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-07/supersized-10-most-awe-inspiring-projects-universe. Accessed April 10, 2018.
- Kameda, T., Stasson, M. F., Davis, J. H., Parks, C. D., & Zimmerman, S. K. (1992). Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: In search of an ‘Optimal’ team size in division of work. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, Z. (2012). Discover the phenomenon of optimal collaboration size in science. Studies in Science of Science, 30(4), 481–486.Google Scholar
- Price, D. S. (1963). Big science, little science (p. 119). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Robinson-Garcia, N., Sugimoto, C. R., Murray, D., Yegros-Yegros, A., Larivière, V., & Costas, R. (2018). The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to track scientific exchanges. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03449.
- Rodríguez, D., Sicilia, M. A., García, E., & Harrison, R. (2012). Empirical findings on team size and productivity in software development. Journal of Systems and Software, Novel Approaches in the Design and Implementation of Systems/Software Architecture, 85(3), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.009.Google Scholar
- Wang, R., Li, G., Yun, Y., et al. (2017). China’s international scientific collaboration status: A bibliometrics study (pp. 14–16). Beijing: National Center for S&T Evaluation and Clarivate & Analytics. http://www.ncste.org.
- Xian, W. (2017). A comparative analysis of teachers international mobility in China and Japan: Based on a survey of academic professions in Asia. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 02, 120–128.Google Scholar
- Yang, W., He, M., et al. (2016). 2016 Annual Report of the NSFC. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2016ndbg/07/index.html.
- Zheng, J., Zhi-Yun Zhao, X., Zhang, D.-Z. C., Huang, M.-H., Lei, X.-P., Zhang, Ze-Yu., et al. (2012). International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: A perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics, 91(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0529-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar