Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 120, Issue 2, pp 707–721 | Cite as

On the development of China’s leadership in international collaborations

  • Wei QuanEmail author
  • Philippe Mongeon
  • Maxime Sainte-Marie
  • Rongying Zhao
  • Vincent Larivière
Article

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between leadership, team size, and citation impact in China’s international research output from 1980 to 2016, measured in terms of number of authors, institutions, countries, and citations. Distinction is here made between leading and non-leading Chinese international collaborations, which respectively refer to papers whose first or corresponding author is affiliated to a Chinese institution and papers co-authored by researchers from a Chinese institution but whose first and corresponding authors are not. Analysis at the individual, institutional, and country level show that while average team size by paper increases over the period, the main collaboration mode remains bilateral at the country level. We also observe a positive relationship between team size and research impact up to a certain point, but Chinese-led international collaborations tend to imply smaller teams and have lower impact than non-leading collaborations.

Keywords

Collaboration Team size China Research evaluation Citation analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research for this article has been founded by the Wuhan University Scholarship Fund and Yu Gang-Song Xiao scholarship from Wuhan University, China, Québec-China Short-term research or professional development scholarships (3C), and China Scholarship Council (CSC). The authors also thank the Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies for providing the data.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WQ RYZ VL. Performed the experiments: WQ PM MSM. Analyzed the data: WQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WQ PM MSM RYZ VL. Wrote the paper: WQ PM MSM.

References

  1. Arunachalam, S., Srinivasan, R., & Raman, V. (1994). International collaboration in science: Participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30(1), 7–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: Impact on research performance. Social Geography, 3(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Big Science: The 10 Most Ambitious Experiments in the Universe Today (n.d.). Popular Science. https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-07/supersized-10-most-awe-inspiring-projects-universe. Accessed April 10, 2018.
  4. Bu, Y., Ding, Y., Liang, X., & Murray, D. S. (2018). Understanding persistent scientific collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 438–448.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research, 28(3), 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, T.-L. S., Chuang, C.-M., & Wen-Shiung, J. (1998). International collaboration of law firms: Modes, motives and advantages. Journal of World Business, 33(3), 241–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(99)80073-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2007). The mobility of university inventors in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9012-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cyranoski, D. (2009). Materials science: China’s crystal cache. Nature, 457(7232), 953–955.  https://doi.org/10.1038/457953a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(2), 133–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esparza, J., & Yamada, T. (2007). The discovery value of ‘Big Science’. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 204(4), 701–704.  https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Favell, A., Feldblum, M., & Peter Smith, M. (2007). The human face of global mobility: A Research Agenda. Society, 44(2), 15–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02819922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gingras, Y., & Khelfaoui, M. (2018). Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database. Scientometrics, 114(2), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2007). China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘Giants’. Research Policy, Emerging nanotechnologies, 36(6), 880–886.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.004.Google Scholar
  15. Guimerà, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. Sch Leadersh Manag, 30(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2043-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kakihara, M., & Sørensen, C. (2004). Practising mobile professional work: Tales of locational, operational, and interactional mobility. Info, 6(3), 180–187.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14636690410549507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kameda, T., Stasson, M. F., Davis, J. H., Parks, C. D., & Zimmerman, S. K. (1992). Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: In search of an ‘Optimal’ team size in division of work. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(1), 47–56.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2786685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liang, L., & Zhu, L. (2002). Major factors affecting China’s inter-regional research collaboration: Regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity. Scientometrics, 55(2), 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, Z. (2012). Discover the phenomenon of optimal collaboration size in science. Studies in Science of Science, 30(4), 481–486.Google Scholar
  24. Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C.-F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manganote, E. J. T., Araujo, M. S., et al. (2014). Visualization of ranking data: Geographical signatures in international collaboration, leadership and research impact. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mccoll-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Price, D. S. (1963). Big science, little science (p. 119). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson-Garcia, N., Sugimoto, C. R., Murray, D., Yegros-Yegros, A., Larivière, V., & Costas, R. (2018). The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to track scientific exchanges. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03449.
  29. Rodríguez, D., Sicilia, M. A., García, E., & Harrison, R. (2012). Empirical findings on team size and productivity in software development. Journal of Systems and Software, Novel Approaches in the Design and Implementation of Systems/Software Architecture, 85(3), 562–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.009.Google Scholar
  30. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Slater, L. (2005). Leadership for collaboration: An affective process. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(4), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2013). Latent science collaboration: Strategies of bioethical capacity building in Mainland China’s stem cell world. BioSocieties, 8(1), 7–24.  https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2012). Effects of international collaboration and knowledge moderation on China’s nanotechnology research impacts. Journal of Technology Management in China, 7(1), 94–110.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771211207376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tohidi, H., & Tarokh, M. J. (2006). Productivity outcomes of teamwork as an effect of information technology and team size. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 610–615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsukuda, R. A. (1990). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Teamwork in geriatrics. Geriatric Medicine (pp. 668–675). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2093-8_52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wallmark, J. T., Eckerstein, S., Langered, B., & Holmqvist, H. E. S. (1973). The increase in efficiency with size of research teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM, 20(3), 80–86.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1973.6448434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, R., Li, G., Yun, Y., et al. (2017). China’s international scientific collaboration status: A bibliometrics study (pp. 14–16). Beijing: National Center for S&T Evaluation and Clarivate & Analytics. http://www.ncste.org.
  40. Wang, X., Shenmeng, X., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885–894.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0877-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xian, W. (2017). A comparative analysis of teachers international mobility in China and Japan: Based on a survey of academic professions in Asia. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 02, 120–128.Google Scholar
  42. Xie, Yu., Zhang, C., & Lai, Q. (2014). China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9437–9442.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407709111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang, W., He, M., et al. (2016). 2016 Annual Report of the NSFC. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2016ndbg/07/index.html.
  44. Yuan, L., Hao, Y., Li, M., Bao, C., Li, J., & Wu, D. (2018). Who are the international research collaboration partners for China? A novel data perspective based on NSFC grants. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2753-3.Google Scholar
  45. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang, P.-P., Chen, K., He, Y., Zhou, T., Bei-Bei, S., Jin, Y., et al. (2006). Model and empirical study on some collaboration networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 360(2), 599–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.05.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zheng, J., Zhi-Yun Zhao, X., Zhang, D.-Z. C., Huang, M.-H., Lei, X.-P., Zhang, Ze-Yu., et al. (2012). International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: A perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics, 91(1), 65–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0529-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Quan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Philippe Mongeon
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Maxime Sainte-Marie
    • 3
  • Rongying Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vincent Larivière
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Research Center for Chinese Science EvaluationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Information ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’informationUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Centre for Science and Technology StudiesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research PolicyAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations