Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 119, Issue 3, pp 1487–1496 | Cite as

Influence of international authorship on citations in Brazilian medical journals: a bibliometric analysis

  • Adilson Marcos MontefuscoEmail author
  • Felipe Parra do Nascimento
  • Luiz Ubirajara Sennes
  • Ricardo Ferreira Bento
  • Rui Imamura
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

The challenge of increasing the impact of regional journals has received much attention. While funding and research agencies require the acceptance of papers from foreign authors as a means of increasing citations, Brazilian journal editors dispute the impact of this measure. This study aimed to evaluate, for Brazilian medical journals, whether the number of citations a document received was influenced by the authors’ institutional affiliations or other predictive factors related to the paper or the journal. Sixty-one medical journals published in Brazil in 2012 were selected for analysis. SCImago and Scopus were used to extract the articles and their data. The number of citations a document received in 5 years was analyzed according to the authors’ affiliations, language, document type, SCImago Cites per Document, and journal subject category. After adjusting for covariates by multivariate analysis, documents with collaborative international affiliations showed a citation increase of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.084–0.216) over documents by Brazilian authors. Significant increases in citations were also observed for bilingual documents (0.329; 95% CI: 0.236–0.380), English-only documents (0.159; 95% CI: 0.078–0.203), articles (1.590; 95% CI: 1.363–1.714), reviews (2.752; 95% CI: 2.355–2.972), and those under the subject category of hematology (1.280; 95% CI: 0.756–1.604). In summary, while collaborative international authorship increased citations in the investigated journals, language, type of document, and subject category had a stronger impact on the number of citations.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Citation analysis Scopus International visibility International cooperation Science evaluation 

Supplementary material

11192_2019_3104_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. ABRASCO. (2014). Fórum de Editores de Saúde Coletiva contesta proposta de novos critérios do Portal SciELO. http://www.abrasco.org.br/site/2014/11/forum-de-editores-de-saude-coletiva-carta-de-sao-paulo/. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  2. Ainsworth, S., & Russell, J. M. (2018). Has hosting on science direct improved the visibility of Latin American scholarly journals? A preliminary analysis of data quality. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1463–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandao, A., Cupolillo, E., & Pirmez, C. (2017). Brazilian scientific journals: challenges, (dis)incentives and one fundamental question. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 112(10), 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colantonio, L. D., Baldridge, A. S., Huffman, M. D., Bloomfield, G. S., & Prabhakaran, D. (2015). Cardiovascular research publications from Latin America between 1999 and 2008. A bibliometric study. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 104(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  5. Coura, J. R., & Willcox, L. C. (2003). Impact factor, scientific production and quality of Brazilian medical journals. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 98(3), 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruz, C. H. B. (2013). O desafio de aumentar o impacto da ciência brasileira FAPESP. http://www.fapesp.br/eventos/2013/05/confap/desafio-impacto-confap.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2016.
  7. Cruz, C. H. B. (2014). Sobre o impacto dos artigos científicos de autores no Brasil. FAPESP. http://pt.slideshare.net/scielo/sobre-o-impacto-dos-artigos-cientficos-de-autores-no-brasil. Accessed July 13, 2016.
  8. Diekhoff, T., Schlattmann, P., & Dewey, M. (2013). Impact of article language in multi-language medical journals–a bibliometric analysis of self-citations and impact factor. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elsevier. (2016). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/. Accessed October 19, 2016.
  10. Freire, D. (2014). SciELO anuncia medidas para internacionalização de periódicos científicos. Agência FAPESPhttp://agencia.fapesp.br/scielo_anuncia_medidas_para_internacionalizacao_de_periodicos_cientificos/20356/. Accessed 12 July 2017.
  11. Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA, 302(10), 1092–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kulkarni, A. V., Busse, J. W., & Shams, I. (2007). Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS ONE, 2(5), e403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lira, R. P., Vieira, R. M., Goncalves, F. A., Ferreira, M. C., Maziero, D., Passos, T. H., et al. (2013). Influence of English language in the number of citations of articles published in Brazilian journals of ophthalmology. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 76(1), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marques, F. (2015). Para ampliar o impacto: Biblioteca SciELO lança diretrizes para internacionalizar sua coleção de revistas. Pesquisa FAPESP, 227, 32–35.Google Scholar
  15. Meneghini, R., Mugnaini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2006). International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases. Scientometrics, 69(3), 529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meneghini, R., Packer, A. L., & Nassi-Calo, L. (2008). Articles by latin american authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Minitab 17 Statistical Software. (2013). [Computer software]. State College, PA: Minitab Inc. https://www.minitab.com. Accessed August 10, 2017.
  18. Moreira, L. F. (2017). Impact of Brazilian papers in cardiology and cardiovascular sciences in the last decade. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 108(1), 1–2.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Royle, P., Kandala, N. B., Barnard, K., & Waugh, N. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SciELO. (2017). Critérios, política e procedimentos para a admissão e a permanência de periódicos científicos na Coleção SciELO Brasil. http://www.scielo.br/avaliacao/Criterios_SciELO_Brasil_versao_revisada_atualizada_outubro_20171206.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2017.
  21. SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed October 29, 2017.
  22. Winnik, S., Speer, T., Raptis, D. A., Walker, J. H., Hasun, M., Clavien, P. A., et al. (2013). The wealth of nations and the dissemination of cardiovascular research. International Journal of Cardiology, 169(3), 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations