Advertisement

Scientific knowledge in South Africa: information trends, patterns and collaboration

  • Radhamany SooryamoorthyEmail author
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

South Africa has made remarkable progress in science and technology. In the production of scientific information it is a leading country not only in sub-Saharan Africa but also in Africa as a whole. Given the achievements South Africa has made in the production of scientific information, it will be of interest to examine the characteristic nature of science in the country. This has importance for South Africa and also for other African countries. As science is evident in the publications that are produced, this paper examines the characteristic features of scientific information produced by South African scholars. Drawing on the publication records stored in the Web of Science database, the paper examines the distinguishing features of scientific production including collaboration, visibility and impact. The paper also deals with the relationship between visibility (citations) and the characteristics of South African publications.

Keywords

South Africa Information Publications Collaboration Citation 

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86, 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alemna, A. A. (1992). Scientific and technical information in Ghana. Information Development, 8, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aman, V. (2016). How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system. Scientometrics, 109, 2195–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade, H. B., López, E. d. I. R., & Martín, T. B. (2009). Dimensions of scientific collaboration and its contribution to the academic research groups’ scientific quality. Research Evaluation, 18, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnard, H., Cowan, R., & Müller, M. (2012). Global excellence at the expense of local diffusion, or a bridge between two worlds? Research in science and technology in the developing world. Research Policy, 41, 756–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrantes, B. S. L., Bote, V. P. G., Rodríguez, Z. C., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2012). Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornmann, L. (2016). Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68, 1036–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23728.Google Scholar
  8. Confraria, H., & Godinho, M. M. (2015). The impact of African science: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102, 1241–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Confraria, H., Godinho, M. M., & Wang, L. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 845–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation, 23, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Godinho, M. M., Mendonça, S. F., & Pereira, T. S. (2008). Towards a taxonomy of innovation systems. Paper presented at the 5th International Ph.D. School on Innovation and Economic Development, Tampere, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  15. Guan, J., Yan, Y., & Zhang, J. J. (2017). The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2013). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. Scientometrics, 95, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingwersen, P., & Jacobs, D. (2004). South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000. Scientometrics, 59, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs, D. (2006). Analysis of scientific research in selected institutions in South Africa: A bibliometric study. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 72, 72–77.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, D. (2008). An Informetríc analysis of publication and research collaboration patterns in natural and applied sciences in South Africa. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 74, 41–48.Google Scholar
  20. Jeenah, M., & Pouris, A. (2008). South African research in the context of Africa and globally. South African Journal of Science, 104, 351–354.Google Scholar
  21. Jonathan, A., Christopher, K., & Daniel, H. (2010). Global Research Report Africa. Leeds: Evidence, Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
  22. Kahn, M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of South Africa’s scientific outputs—Some trends and implications. South African Journal of Science, 107, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.vl4107il/4102.4406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khor, K. A., & Yu, L.-G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107, 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kyvik, S., & Reymert, I. (2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: Differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113, 951–967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maisonobe, M., Eckert, D., Grossetti, M., Jégou, L., & Milard, B. (2016). The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: Domestic or international dynamics? Journal of Informetrics, 10, 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mêgnigbêto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: The case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96, 761–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendonça, S., Pereira, J., & Ferreira, M. E. (2018). Gatekeeping African studies: What does ‘‘editormetrics’’ indicate about journal governance? Scientometrics, 117, 1513–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mouton, J. (2000). Patterns of research collaboration in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 96, 458–462.Google Scholar
  30. Mouton, J., & Blanckenberg, J. (2018). African science: A bibliometric analysis. In C. Beaudry, J. Mouton, & H. Prozesky (Eds.), The next generation of scientists in Africa (pp. 13–25). Cape Town: African Minds.Google Scholar
  31. Müller, M., Cowan, R., & Barnard, H. (2018). On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa. Research Policy, 47, 886–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nomaler, Ö., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2013). Do more distant collaborations have more citation impact? Journal of Informetrics, 7, 966–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Onyancha, O. B. (2011). Research collaborations between South Africa and other countries, 1986–2005: An informetric analysis. African Journal of Library & Information Science, 21, 99–112.Google Scholar
  34. Patra, S. K., & Muchie, M. (2017). Engineering research profile of countries in the African Union. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development and Change, 9, 449–465.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2017.1341732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pouris, A. (2003). South Africa’s research publication record: The last 10 years. South African Journal of Science, 99, 425–428.Google Scholar
  36. Pouris, A. (2006). A bibliometric assessment of South African research publications included in the internationally indexed database of Thomson ISI. Report on a Strategic Approach to Research Publishing in South Africa in South Africa (pp. 9–29). Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa.Google Scholar
  37. Pouris, A. (2012). Science in South Africa: The dawn of a renaissance? South African Journal of Science, 108(7/8), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shashnov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2018). Research landscape of the BRICS countries: Current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics, 117, 1115–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2015). Transforming science in South Africa: Development, collaboration and productivity. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2018). The production of science in Africa: An analysis of publications in the science disciplines, 2000–2015. Scientometrics, 115(1), 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tarango, J., & Machín-Mastromatteo, J. D. (2015). Scientific production in Mexican universities: Rates and expectations toward competitiveness. Information Development, 32, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2015). Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1124–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, Q.-J., Feng, G.-F., Chen, Y. E., Wen, J., & Chang, C.-P. (2019). The impacts of government ideology on innovation: What are the main implications? Research Policy, 48, 1232–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations