Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 1157–1171 | Cite as

Bibliometric analysis of publications from post-Soviet countries in psychological journals in 1992–2017

  • Andrey LovakovEmail author
  • Elena Agadullina
Article

Abstract

For several decades the Soviet academic psychology community was isolated from the West, yet after the collapse of the Soviet Union each of the 15 countries went their own way in economic, social, and scientific development. The paper analyses publications from post-Soviet countries in psychological journals in 1992–2017, i.e. 26 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Over the period in question, 15 post-Soviet countries had published 4986 papers in psychology, accounting for less than one percent of the world output in psychological journals. However, the growth of post-Soviet countries’ output in psychological journals, especially that of Russia and Estonia, is observed during this period. Over time, post-Soviet authors began to write more papers in international teams, constantly increasing the proportion of papers in which they are leaders and main contributors. Their papers are still underrepresented in the best journals as well as among the most cited papers in the field and are also cited lower than the world average. However, the impact of psychological papers from post-Soviet countries increases with time. There is a huge diversity between 15 post-Soviet countries in terms of contribution, autonomy, and impact. Regarding the number of papers in psychological journals, the leading nations are Russia, Estonia, Lithuania, Ukraine, and Georgia. Estonia is the leader in autonomy in publishing papers in psychological journals among post-Soviet countries. Papers from Estonia and Georgia are cited higher than the world average, whereas papers from Russia and Ukraine are cited below the world average. Estonia and Georgia also boast a high number of Highly cited papers.

Keywords

Post-Soviet countries Psychology Bibliometric analysis National comparison Web of Science InCites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Jüri Allik and Vladimir Pislyakov for comments to previous version of the manuscript. The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program and funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100’.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aleksandrova-Howell, M., Abramson, C. I., & Craig, D. P. A. (2012). Coverage of Russian psychological contributions in American psychology textbooks. International Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 76–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.614618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allik, J. (2003). The quality of science in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania after the first decade of independenc. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 40–52.Google Scholar
  3. Allik, J. (2007). History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective. Psychological Research, 71(6), 618–625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0051-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allik, J. (2008). Quality of Estonian science estimated through bibliometric indicators (1997–2007). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 57(4), 255–264.  https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2008.4.08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allik, J. (2011). Psychology in Estonia. In J. Engelbrecht (Ed.), Research in Estonia: Present and future (pp. 418–429). Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Allik, J. (2015). Progress in Estonian science. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 64(2), 125–126.Google Scholar
  7. Allik, J., & Tammiksaar, E. (2016). Who was Emil Kraepelin and why do we remember him 160 years later? Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(4), 317.  https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2016.4.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buela-Casal, G., Perakakis, P., Taylor, M., & Checa, P. (2006). Measuring internationality: reflections and perspectives on academic journals. Scientometrics, 67(1), 45–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0050-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695. Retrieved from http://igraph.org.
  10. Dafermos, M. (2014). Soviet psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1828–1835). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiala, D., & Willett, P. (2015). Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989–2014: A bibliometric study. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(5), 526–541.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2015-0027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guskov, A. E., Kosyakov, D. V., & Selivanova, I. V. (2018). Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: The circumstances of breakthrough. Scientometrics, 117(2), 1053–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gzoyan, E. G., Hovhannisyan, L. A., Aleksanyan, S. A., Ghazaryan, N. A., Hunanyan, S. R., Bourghida, A., et al. (2015). Comparative analysis of the scientific output of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Scientometrics, 102(1), 195–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1452-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haggbloom, S. J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J. E., Jones, V. K., Yarbrough, G. L., Russell, T. M., et al. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haslam, N., & Kashima, Y. (2010). The rise and rise of social psychology in Asia: A bibliometric analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(3), 202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01320.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozak, M., Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1101–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1439-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauk, K., & Allik, J. (2018). A puzzle of estonian science: How to explain unexpected rise of the scientific impact. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 22(4), 329.  https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.4.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lovakov, A. (2017). Russian authors in leading international journals in psychology: A bibliometric analysis. Psychology: Journal of Higher School of Economics, 14(4), 657–678. Retrieved from https://psy-journal.hse.ru/2017-14-4/213551617.html.
  19. Lovakov, A., & Yudkevich, M. (2018). Higher education research: Post-Soviet publication landscape. In CHER 31th annual conference. Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  20. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2010). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 474–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Markusova, V. A., Ivanov, V. V., & Varshavskii, A. E. (2009a). Bibliometric indicators of Russian science and of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1997–2007). Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 79(3), 197–204.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331609030010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Markusova, V. A., Jansz, M., Libkind, A. N., Libkind, I., & Varshavsky, A. (2009b). Trends in Russian research output in post-Soviet era. Scientometrics, 79(2), 249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0416-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poldin, O., Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Yudkevich, M. (2017). Publication Activities of Russian universities: The effects of project 5–100. Voprosy Obrazovaniya/Educational Studies Moscow.  https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-2-10-35.Google Scholar
  26. R Core Team, D. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/.
  27. Raudla, R., Karo, E., Valdmaa, K., & Kattel, R. (2015). Implications of project-based funding of research on budgeting and financial management in public universities. Higher Education, 70(6), 957–971.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9875-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiermeier, Q. (2010). Russia to boost university science. Nature, 464(7293), 1257.  https://doi.org/10.1038/4641257a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turko, T., Bakhturin, G., Bagan, V., Poloskov, S., & Gudym, D. (2016). Influence of the program “5–top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities. Scientometrics, 109(2), 769–782.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yasnitsky, A. (2010). Regarding the isolationism of Soviet psychology: International conferences in the 1920–1930s. Voprosy Psikhologii, 3, 101–111.Google Scholar
  32. Yasnitsky, A. (2011). Regarding the isolationism of the Soviet psychology: Scientific publications of the 1920s and 1930s. Voprosy Psikhologii, 1, 124–136.Google Scholar
  33. Zavadskas, E. K., Kirvaitis, R., & Dagienė, E. (2011). Scientific publications released in the Baltic States. Scientometrics, 88(1), 179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0394-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Institutional StudiesNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations