Publications from university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments: a look at Belgium, France and the Netherlands from 2001 to 2015
- 17 Downloads
Publication performance of academic departments hints at research activity and attractiveness for employees. The aim of this retrospective bibliographic study was to compare publication performance of academic anaesthesiology departments in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Outcome measures were number of publications, original articles and number of citations per department, number of publications per anaesthesiologist and per capita and average impact factor per department. Articles published by university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2015 were included. Articles were imported from Medline into the databank with “Perl-Scripts” and electronically linked to academic anaesthesiology departments according to the affiliation field of the corresponding author. Publication performance was assessed for the periods 2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2015 and 2001–2015. From 2001 to 2015 in all three countries, the absolute numbers of articles increased (+ 110%), while the number of original research articles decreased (− 53%). Paris Diderot (Paris 7) booked the largest number of publications and achieved the highest average impact factor, while Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6) published the largest number of original articles and achieved the highest number of citations. Besançon had the highest average impact factor per article and the Netherlands the largest number of publications per capita. In Belgium, France and the Netherlands, the number of publications increased from 2001 to 2015. From 2001 to 2015 the number of publications increased, while the number of original articles decreased. France was seen to have the largest number of publications, while Belgium and the Netherlands had more publications per capita.
KeywordsAnaesthesiology Publications Research University hospitals
Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)
We would like to thank Mary Margreiter for the language review.
All authors have materially participated in the research and in article preparation. EC analysed and interpreted the data and was the major contributor in writing the manuscript. PH drew up the database. JA and MV checked the data and helped write the text. PP supervised the whole process and performed language editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed in this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
- European Commission. (2010). Legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes: European Union 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/legislation_en.htm. Accessed Aug 2018.
- European Commission. (2014). Medicinal products for human use-clinical trials Directive 2001/20/EC 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/clinical-trials/regulation/index_en.htm. Accessed Aug 2018.
- Eurostat. (2012). Europe in figures-Eurostat yearbook 2012: Science and technology (tables and graphs). Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistical-books/-/CH_13_2012_XLS. Accessed Aug 2018.
- Pandit, J. (2005). National strategy for academic anaesthesia. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists.Google Scholar
- Szokol, J. W., Murphy, G. S., Avram, M. J., Nitsun, M., Wynnychenko, T. M., & Vender, J. S. (2003). Declining proportion of publications by American authors in major anesthesiology journals. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 96(2), 513–517.Google Scholar
- The World Bank. (2016). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). Washington, DC: World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS. Accessed Aug 2018.
- Thomson Reuters’ ISI Web of Knowledge. (2018). Thomson Reuters’ ISI Web of Knowledge. http://portal.isiknowledge.com. Accessed Aug 2018.