The R&D composition of European countries: concentrated versus dispersed profiles
- 63 Downloads
In this study, we use a unique dataset covering all higher education institutions, public research Institutions and private companies that have applied for funding to the European Framework Programs for Research and Innovation in the period 2007–2017. The first aim of this study is to show the composition of R&D performing actors per country, which to the best of our knowledge has never been done before. The second aim of this study is to compare country profiles in R&D composition, so that we may analyse whether the countries differ in concentration of R&D performing institutions. The third aim of this study is to investigate whether different R&D country profiles are associated with how the R&D systems perform, i.e. whether the profiles are associated with Research and Innovation performance indicators. Our study shows that the concentration of R&D actors at country-level and within the sectors differ across European countries, with the general conclusion being that countries that can be characterized as well-performing on citation and innovation indicators seem to combine (a) high shares of Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D as percentage of GDP with (b) a highly skewed R&D system, where a small part of the R&D performing actors account for a very high share of the national R&D performance. This indicates a dual R&D system which combines a few large R&D performing institutions with a very large number of small actors.
KeywordsEuropean Framework Programs Research performance indicators Innovation R&D systems Country profiles
This study was funded by R-QUEST, Research Council of Norway Grant Number 256223.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrandiz, E. & Leon, M. (2012). Quantity or quality? What do academic R&D funds promote? Paper presented at the DRUID 2012 (June 19–21), Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2017). Measuring the productvity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 246–258.Google Scholar
- Anic, I.-D. (2017). Facilitating effective science-industry collaborative research: A literature review. Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika, 26, 7–40.Google Scholar
- Braunerhjelm, P., Ding, D. & Thulin, P. (2014). Does labor mobility foster innovation? Evidence from Sweden. In Working paper 30. Swedish Entrepreneurship: Forum.Google Scholar
- Commission, European. (2015). An analysis of the role and impact of Research Performing Organisations’ participation in the Framework Programmes (PP-01264-2104). Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Research & Innovation.Google Scholar
- Ebersberger, B., & Lööf, H. (2005). Multinational enterprises, spillover, innovation and productivity. International Journal of Management Research, 4, 7–37.Google Scholar
- Ejsing, A., Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H., & Laursen, K. (2013). The role of university scientist mobility for industrial innovation. IZA discussion paper 7470.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2018). European innovation scoreboard.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2017). Eurostat news release 183/2017—1 December 2017.Google Scholar
- Hottenrott, H. & Lawson, C. (2012). Research grants, sources of ideas and the effects on academic research. Discussion paper no. 12-048. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH.Google Scholar
- Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2006). Universities in national innovation systems, chapter 8. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Piro, F. N., Scordato, L. & Aksnes, D. W. (2016). Choosing the right partners. Norwegian participation in European framework programmes. NIFU Report 2016: 41. Oslo, NIFU.Google Scholar
- Piro, F.N., Tømte, C., Rørstad, K. & Thune, T. (2013). Langsiktig kunnskapsutvikling på næringslivets premisser? Evaluering av Nærings-ph.d.-ordningen. NIFU-rapport 2/2013. Oslo, NIFU.Google Scholar
- Solberg, E., Larsen, K., Wiig, O., Aagaard, K. & Sivertsen, G. (2012). Markets for applied research. A comparative analysis of R&D-systems in five countries. NIFU Report 46/2012. Oslo, NIFU.Google Scholar
- Tijssen, R., Lamers, W., & Yegros, A. (2017). UK universities interacting with industry: Patterns of research collaboration and inter-sectoral mobility of academic researchers. Working paper no. 14. March 2017. London, Centre for Global Higher Education working paper series.Google Scholar