Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 97–118 | Cite as

Analysing the theoretical roots of technology emergence: an evolutionary perspective

  • Serhat BurmaogluEmail author
  • Olivier Sartenaer
  • Alan Porter
  • Munan Li
Article

Abstract

There has been much research concerning emergence in technology, ever since knowledge has been accepted as a prime engine of economic growth. However, even though there are a growing number of publications, the concept remains ambiguous. In this study, we aim to trace emergence discussions to find the evolution of related concepts, in order to explore usage in the technological context. To achieve this, the philosophy of science, complexity, and economic literatures are reviewed in accordance with the emergence concept qualitatively. Then, a bibliometrics study is performed to strengthen the qualitative argument and find evidence of emergence in technology studies for comparison. Based on the findings, we can assert that the definition of technology emergence needs to be revised with consideration of its theoretical foundations. Moreover, after discussion, research questions are posed for future research.

Keywords

Emergence Technology emergence Emerging technology Evolution Conceptual evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (Grant No. 1759960), TUBITAK (Grant No. 2219/2) and Izmir Katip Celebi Universitesi BAP (Grant No. 2018-ODL-IIBF-0015). Olivier Sartenaer gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

References

  1. Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, and deity, the gifford lectures at glasgow, 1916–1918. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J., Chase, J., Newman, N., Porter, A., & Roessner, J. D. (2012). Emergence as a conceptual framework for understanding scientific and technological progress. In Picmet ‘12: ProceedingsTechnology Management for Emerging Technologies (pp. 1286–1292).Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs - a cyclical model of technological-change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avila-Robinson, A., & Miyazaki, K. (2013). Dynamics of scientific knowledge bases as proxies for discerning technological emergence—The case of mems/nems technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1071–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1998). Vitalism.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-q109-1.
  7. Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution: Qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dodrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broad, C. D., & Tarner lecture 1923. [from old catalog]. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Carbonell, J., Sanchez-Esguevillas, A., & Carro, B. (2018). Easing the assessment of emerging technologies in technology observatories. Findings about patterns of dissemination of emerging technologies on the internet (vol 30, pg 113, 2017). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(1), Iii.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1344005.
  10. Carley, S. F., Newman, N. C., Porter, A. L., & Garner, J. G. (2017). A measure of staying power: Is the persistence of emergent concepts more significantly influenced by technical domain or scale? Scientometrics, 111(3), 2077–2087.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2342-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carley, S. F., Newman, N. C., Porter, A. L., & Garner, J. G. (2018). An indicator of technical emergence. Scientometrics, 115(1), 35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2654-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, C. M. (2006). Citespace ii: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corning, P. A. (2002). The re-emergence of “emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity, 7(6), 18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.10043.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K. S., Lee, H. J., Ordonez, G., et al. (2010). Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(3), 361–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537321003647396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crutchfield, J. P. (2013). Is anything ever new? Considering emergence. In M. A. Bedau & P. Humphreys (Eds.), Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. Cambridge: MIT Press Scholarship Online, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Foster, J., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2012). Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2–3), 420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederiksen, P., & Jagtfelt, T. (2013). Exponential expansion in evolutionary economics: A model proposition. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(3), 705–718.  https://doi.org/10.2753/Jei0021-3624470306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Goldspink, C., & Kay, R. (2010). Emergence in organizations: The reflexive turn. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 12(3), 47–63.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein, J. (2003). Emergence, creativity, and the following and negating. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Goldstein, J. (2004). Emergence, creative process, and self-transcending concstructions. In M. Lissack, & K. Richardson (Eds.), Managing organizational complexity philosophy, theory and application (Vol. Managing the Complex). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Pub.Google Scholar
  23. Gustafsson, R., Kuusi, O., & Meyer, M. (2015). Examining open-endedness of expectations in emerging technological fields: The case of cellulosic ethanol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 179–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harper, D. A., & Endres, A. M. (2012). The anatomy of emergence, with a focus upon capital formation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2), 352–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgson, G. M. (2002). Darwinism in economics: From analogy to ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(3), 259–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-002-0118-8.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaric, I., Knezevic-Jaric, J., & Lenhardt, M. (2014). Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences. Scientometrics, 100(2), 519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1268-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joung, J., & Kim, K. (2017). Monitoring emerging technologies for technology planning using technical keyword based analysis from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 281–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klincewicz, K. (2016). The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: The case of graphene. Scientometrics, 106(1), 319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1780-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kreuchauff, F., & Korzinov, V. (2017). A patent search strategy based on machine learning for the emerging field of service robotics. Scientometrics, 111(2), 743–772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2268-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwon, H., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2017). Applying lsa text mining technique in envisioning social impacts of emerging technologies: The case of drone technology. Technovation, 60–61, 15–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, C., Kwon, O., Kim, M., & Kwon, D. (2018). Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 291–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, M. N., Porter, A. L., & Suominen, A. (2018). Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 285–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Low, B., & Johnston, W. (2012). Emergent technologies, network paradoxes, and incrementalism. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 821–828.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2012). Forms of emergence and the evolution of economic landscapes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2), 338–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan, C. L., & Gifford lectures 1922. [from old catalog]. (1923). Emergent evolution: The Gifford lectures. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  36. Munier, F., & Ronde, P. (2001). The role of knowledge codification in the emergence of consensus under uncertainty: Empirical analysis and policy implications. Research Policy, 30(9), 1537–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00166-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olleros, F. J., & Macdonald, R. J. (1988). Strategic alliances—Managing complementarity to capitalize on emerging technologies. Technovation, 7(2), 155–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(88)90045-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phaal, R., O’Sullivan, E., Routley, M., Ford, S., & Probert, D. (2011). A framework for mapping industrial emergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Randles, S., Dewick, P., Loveridge, D., & Schmidt, J. C. (2008). Nano-worlds as schumpeterian emergence and polanyian double-movements. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701726312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, D. K. R., & Propp, T. (2008). Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(4), 517–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/i.techfore.2008.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robinson, D. K. R., Ruivenkamp, M., & Rip, A. (2007). Tracking the evolution of new and emerging s&t via statement-linkages: Vision assessment in molecular machines. Scientometrics, 70(3), 831–858.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0314-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, D. M. (1998). Dualism.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-v011-1.
  43. Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827–1843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sartenaer, O. (2018). Disentangling the vitalism-emergentism knot. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 49(1), 73–88.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-017-9361-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 551–585.  https://doi.org/10.1086/338780.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Small, H., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(8), 1450–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2017). Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies on the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 369–381.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephan, A. (1992). Emergence—a systematic view on its historical facets. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 25–48). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  49. Surie, G. (2013). Innovating via emergent technology and distributed organization: A case of biofuel production in india. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 253–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teran, M. V. (2017). Philosophical explorations for a concept of emerging technologies. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology.  https://doi.org/10.5480/techne201792170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Upham, S. P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 15–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van der Valk, T., Moors, E. H. M., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2009). Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: The case of biotechnology developments in the netherlands. Technovation, 29(4), 247–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Merkerk, R. O., & Robinson, D. K. R. (2006). Characterizing the emergence of a technological field: Expectations, agendas and networks in lab-on-a-chip technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 411–428.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Merkerk, R. O., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2008). Tailoring cta for emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(3), 312–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Merkerk, R. O., & van Lente, H. (2005). Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technologies: The case of nanotubes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(9), 1094–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Merkerk, R. O., & van Lente, H. (2008). Asymmetric positioning and emerging paths. Futures, 40(7), 643–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Rijnsoever, F. J., van den Berg, J., Koch, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). Smart innovation policy: How network position and project composition affect the diversity of an emerging technology. Research Policy, 44(5), 1094–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitehad, A. N. (1926). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Wierzbicki, A. P. (2015). Systems theory, theory of chaos, emergence. Technen: Elements of recent history of information technologies with epistemological conclusions (pp. 175–188). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Woodson, T. S. (2016). Public private partnerships and emerging technologies: A look at nanomedicine for diseases of poverty. Research Policy, 45(7), 1410–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang, K., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Citation analysis: A comparison of google scholar, scopus, and web of science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504301185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesIzmir Katip Celebi UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.School of Public Policy, STIPGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Philosophisches SeminarUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  4. 4.School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Search TechnologyNorcrossUSA
  6. 6.School of Business AdministrationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations