The Brazilian academic genealogy: evidence of advisor–advisee relationships through quantitative analysis
Science can be examined from several standpoints, such as through a bibliometric analysis of the scientific output of researchers, research groups or institutions. However, there is little information about the advisor–advisee relationships or the academic supervision of researchers or between teachers and students. In this paper, we examine the results of the academic genealogy of PhD and Master’s students working in Brazil, which was obtained from 737,919 curriculum vitae extracted from the Lattes Platform. Our findings bring to light three main sources of evidence related to the Brazilian academic genealogy: (1) the degree of interdisciplinarity between main areas of knowledge, (2) the structural features and evolving patterns with regard to both areas of knowledge and researchers, and (3) the patterns in the levels of training that affect the topological metrics. We conclude that academic genealogy offers a great opportunity to assess researchers and their areas of research from the perspective of human resource training.
KeywordsAcademic genealogy Mentoring Network analysis Graphs
The authors would like to thank the Federal University of ABC for its financial support.
- Center for Strategic Studies and Management Science, Technology and Innovation. (2016). Doutores 2015: Estudos da demografia da base técnico-científica brasileira. Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos.Google Scholar
- Damaceno, R. J. P., Rossi, L., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2017). Identificação do grafo de genealogia acadêmica de pesquisadores: Uma abordagem baseada na plataforma Lattes. In Proceedings of the 32nd Brazilian symposium on databases (pp. 76–87).Google Scholar
- Dores, W., Soares, E., Benevenuto, F., & Laender, A. H. F. (2017). Building the Brazilian academic genealogy tree. In J. Kamps, G. Tsakonas, Y. Manolopoulos, L. Iliadis, & I. Karydis (Eds.), Research and advanced technology for digital libraries (pp. 537–543). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jackson, A. (2007). A labor of love: The mathematics genealogy project. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 54(8), 1002–1003.Google Scholar
- Martin, S., Brown, W. M., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2011). Openord: An open-source toolbox for large graph layout. In SPIE proceedings—Visualization and data analysis 2011 (Vol. 7868, pp. 786–806). International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google Scholar
- Rossi, L., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2014). Caracterização de árvores de genealogia acadêmica por meio de métricas em grafos. In Brazilian workshop on social network analysis and mining (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
- Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). Academic genealogy. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (first ed., pp. 365–382). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., Russell, T. G., & Bychowski, B. (2011). Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: An examination of dissertation networks in library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1808–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, C., Han, J., Jia, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., & Guo, J. (2010). Mining advisor–advisee relationships from research publication networks. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 203–212). ACM.Google Scholar
- Wang, W., Liu, J., Xia, F., King, I., & Tong, H. (2017). Shifu: Deep learning based advisor–advisee relationship mining in scholarly big data. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web companion (pp. 303–310). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.Google Scholar