Advertisement

Keyword frequencies in anglophone psychology

  • John G. BenjafieldEmail author
Article

Abstract

A sample of the keywords belonging to the anglophone vocabulary of psychology was created using PsycINFO and the Oxford English Dictionary. Keyword frequencies were analyzed for four equal periods between 1887 and 2014. Keywords that entered psychology before 1919 (e.g., learning, perception) have the highest frequency of usage across all periods. This effect is consistent with the principle of an early mover advantage, whereby the earlier a keyword enters the vocabulary of psychology, the greater will be its subsequent frequency. The most frequently occurring keywords contain exemplars of a core lexicon made up largely of keywords that had ordinary language meanings before they acquired psychological senses (e.g., depression, stress). These keywords not only give rise to a feeling of understanding in most psychologists, but also in many laypersons as well. Low frequency keywords are exemplars of a technical lexicon, the meanings of which are more specialized than those of the core lexicon. Keywords in the vocabulary of psychology are used in ways that are consistent with the words-as-tools analogy derived from the approaches to language of Wittgenstein and Zipf. Members of the early vocabulary of anglophone psychology have many meanings and so are easy to use in many different contexts. However, the fact that they are habitually used does not mean that they are the best tools for the job. It is time to think seriously about which keywords may be bad habits and need replacing by better tools.

Keywords

Early mover advantage Core lexicon Multiwords Technical lexicon Zipf 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1960). The open system in personality theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 301–310.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E., & Ebenholtz, S. M. (1962). The principle of associative symmetry. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 135–163.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. (1986). Oxford psychology series, no. 11. Working memory. New York, NY: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman/Times Books.Google Scholar
  7. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benjafield, J. G. (2008). Revisiting Wittgenstein on Köhler and Gestalt psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 99–118.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benjafield, J. G. (2012). The long past and short history of the vocabulary of anglophone psychology. History of Psychology, 15, 50–71.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benjafield, J. G. (2013). The vocabulary of anglophone psychology in the context of other subjects. History of Psychology, 16, 36–56.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjafield, J. G. (2014). Patterns of similarity and difference between the vocabularies of psychology and other subjects. History of Psychology, 17, 19–35.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benjafield, J. G. (2016). The digital history of the anglophone vocabulary of psychology: An exploration using Zipfian methods. History of Psychology, 19, 125–140.  https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benjafield, J. G. (2017). Between pink noise and white noise: A digital history of The American Journal of Psychology and Psychological Review. The American Journal of Psychology, 130, 505–519.  https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.4.0505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger, A. N., & Dick, A. A. (2007). Entry into banking markets and the early-mover advantage. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39, 775–807. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4494273. Accessed 22 July 2018.
  16. Blair, D. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Blair, D. (2006). Wittgenstein, language and information: Back to the rough ground. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Block, N., McGann, J., Niv, Y., Oliva, A., & Scholl, B. (2018). Studying perception: is it worth it? https://www.psychologicalscience.org/conventions/icps2019/program/iss. Accessed 29 July 2018.
  19. Blodgett, H. C. (1929). The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 113–134.Google Scholar
  20. Boudewijnse, G.-J., Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (1999). Herbart’s mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 2, 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8, 119–136.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10082426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brock, A. (2006). Rediscovering the history of psychology: Interview with Kurt Danziger. History of Psychology, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown, T. (1820). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. Edinburgh: W. and C. Tait.  https://doi.org/10.1037/11820-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown, S. R. (2000). Tip-of-the-tongue phenomena: An introductory phenomenological analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 516–537.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Buchner, E. F. (1913). Psychological progress in 1912. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Capshew, J. H. (1993). Engineering behavior: Project Pigeon, World War II, and the conditioning of BF Skinner. Technology and Culture, 34, 835–857. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3106417. Accessed 26 June 2018.
  27. Christiansen, M. H., & Arnon, I. (2017). More than words: The role of multiword sequences in language learning and words. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 542–551.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2136404. Accessed 29 July 2018.
  29. Collins, A. (2007). From H = log s n to conceptual framework: A short history of information. History of Psychology, 10, 44–72.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.1.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cullicover, P. W., Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2017). Multiword constructions in the grammar. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 552–568.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Danziger, K. (2009). Confessions of a marginal psychologist. In L. P. Mos (Ed.), History of psychology in autobiography (pp. 89–129). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88499-8_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dodds, P. S., Dewhurst, D. R., Hazlehurst, F. F., Van Oort, C. M., Mitchell, L., Reagan, A. J., et al. (2017). Simon’s fundamental rich-get-richer model entails a dominant first-mover advantage. Physical Review E, 95, 052301.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.  https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000.
  36. Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604–620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  38. Fenichel, O. (1945). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  39. Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). Two regimes in the frequency of words and the origins of complex lexicons. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.8.3.165.4101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Oxford: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  43. Gerlach, M., & Altmann, E. G. (2013). Stochastic model for the vocabulary growth in natural languages. Physical Review X, 3, 021006.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.021006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  45. Green, C. D. (2009). The curious rise and fall of experimental psychology in Mind. History of the Human Sciences, 22, 37–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695108099134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Green, C. D. (2015). Why psychology isn’t unified, and probably never will be. Review of General Psychology, 19, 207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Green, C. D., & Feinerer, I. (2015). The evolution of The American Journal of Psychology 1, 1887–1903: A network investigation. The American Journal of Psychology, 128, 387–401.  https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Green, C. D., Shore, M., & Teo, T. (Eds.). (2001). The transformation of psychology: Influences of 19th-century philosophy, technology, and natural science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  49. Greeno, J. G. (1980). Psychology of learning, 1960–1980: One participant’s observations. American Psychologist, 35, 713–728.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.8.713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ha, L. Q., Hanna, P., Ming, J., & Smith, F. J. (2009). Extending Zipf’s law to n-grams for large corpora. Artificial Intelligence Review, 32, 101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-009-9135-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoare, M. R., & Salmon, V. (2000). The vocabulary of science in the OED. In L. Mugglestone (Ed.), Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the untrodden forest (pp. 166–181). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hung, S. M., Styles, S. J., & Hsieh, P. J. (2017). Can a word sound like a shape before you have seen it? Sound-shape mapping prior to conscious awareness. Psychological Science, 28, 263–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616677313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. James, W. (1875). Review of Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie by Wilhelm Wundt. North American Review, 121, 195–201.Google Scholar
  54. James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (original work published 1890).Google Scholar
  55. Jiang, B. (2013). Head/tail breaks: A new classification scheme for data with a heavy-tailed distribution. The Professional Geographer, 65, 482–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jiang, B., & Ma, D. (2018). How complex is a fractal? Head/tail breaks and fractional hierarchy. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 2, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-017-0009-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opfer, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Keenan, T., & Benjafield, J. (1994). An additional measure of availability derived from the Oxford English Dictionary. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 255–257.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99–110.Google Scholar
  61. Krampen, G. (2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics, 106, 1217–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Langari, A., & Tompa, F. W. (2001). Subject classification in the Oxford English Dictionary. In N. Cercone, L. Tsau Young & W. Xindong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on data mining (pp. 329–336). San Jose, CA. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=989536. Accessed 19 March 2011.
  63. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lee, C. J. (1990). Some hypotheses concerning the evolution of polysemous words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 211–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lieber, R. (2005). English word-formation processes. In P. Stekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 375–427). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Locke, J. (1964). An essay concerning human understanding. London: Fontana (original work published 1690).Google Scholar
  67. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morawski, J. G., & St. Martin, J. (2011). The evolving vocabulary of the social sciences: The case of “socialization”. History of Psychology, 14, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323–351.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Newman, M. E. J. (2009). The first-mover advantage in scientific publication. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 86, 68001.  https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/86/68001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2018). www.oed.com. Accessed 29 July 2018.
  73. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Petersen, A., Tenenbaum, J., Havlin, S., Stanley, H., & Perc, M. (2012). Languages cool as they expand: Allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words. Nature Scientific Reports, 2(943), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00943.Google Scholar
  75. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.  https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000.
  76. Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1112–1130.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122, 280–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pillsbury, W. B. (1897). A study in apperception. The American Journal of Psychology, 8, 315–393. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1411485. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
  79. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. PsycINFO. (2018). PsycINFO: A world-class resource for abstracts and citations of behavioral and social science research. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/index.aspx. Accessed 29 July 2018.
  81. Pustet, R. (2004). Zipf and his heirs. Language Sciences, 26, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00018-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reber, A. S., Allen, R., & Reber, E. S. (2009). Penguin dictionary of psychology (4th ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  84. Rewriting the OED. (2018). https://public.oed.com/history/rewriting-the-oed/#. Accessed 29 July 2018.
  85. Sherrington, C. S. (1906). The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2333389. Accessed 13 Aug 2015.
  87. Smith, R. (1992a). Inhibition: History and meaning in the sciences of mind and brain. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, R. (1992b). The meaning of “inhibition” and the discourse of order. Science in Context, 5, 237–264.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  90. Smith, R. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 55–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spear, J. H. (2007). Prominent schools or active specialties? A fresh look at some trends in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 11, 363–380.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170034003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stout, G. F. (1888). The Herbartian psychology. Mind, 13, 321–338. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2247435. Accessed 31 March 2006.
  95. Stratton, G. M. (1903). Experimental psychology and its bearing upon culture. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  96. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Trout, J. D. (2002). Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding. Philosophy of Science, 69, 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tuldava, J. (1996). The frequency spectrum of text and vocabulary. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 38–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179608590062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–167.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Flamingo (original work published 1976).Google Scholar
  104. Williams, J. R., Lessard, P. R., Desu, S., Clark, E. M., Bagrow, J. P., Danforth, C. M., et al. (2015). Zipf’s law holds for phrases, not words. Scientific Reports, 5, 12209.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  106. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yi, K., Beheshti, J., Cole, C., Leide, J. E., & Large, A. (2006). User search behavior of domain specific information retrieval systems: An analysis of the query logs from PsycINFO and ABC-Clio’s Historical Abstracts/America: History and life. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1208–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zipf, G. K. (1965). The psycho-biology of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (original work published 1935).Google Scholar
  110. Zipf, G. K. (2012). Human behavior and the principle of least-effort: An introduction to human ecology. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing (original work published 1949).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations