Co-authorship networks and research impact in large research facilities: benchmarking internal reports and bibliometric databases
In this paper, we address the main differences of the scientific production between internal and external researcher groups of a synchrotron radiation facility. Through the construction and analysis of their co-authorship networks, we could see the structural variations in the way these two different kinds of research groups collaborate. We also evaluated the scientific impact of each group and found surprising similarities, which led us to create two hypotheses that might contribute to the comprehension of the scientific assessment of large-scale research facilities. We found that, as the review criteria the studied synchrotron adopts to select external scientific projects is very effective; the quality of the external research is at least as good as the internal. Therefore, evaluating the internal scientific output appears to be an appropriate representation of the impact of the whole laboratory.
KeywordsResearch impact Large-scale facilities Co-authorship networks Collaboration dynamics
This work was supported by Grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil.
- Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomi, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8, 361–362.Google Scholar
- de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Hallonsten, O. (2016a). Use and produxtivity of contemporary, multidisciplinary Big Science. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 485–495.Google Scholar
- Hallonsten, O. (2016b). Use and productivity of contemporary, multidisciplinary big science. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 486–495.Google Scholar
- Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., van Eck, N. J., et al. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar