Advertisement

Some reflections on being cited 10,000 times

  • James Hartley
Article

Abstract

This letter describes the author’s reactions to being cited 10,000 times in Google Scholar. Data are provided to illustrate differences between the numbers of citations for books and edited works and between papers on different topics and in different styles.

Keywords

Google Scholar Academic writing Titles Writing alone or together 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Guillaume Cabanac and Ivor Davies for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Batista, P. D., Marques-Carneiro, I., de Almeida, Hermeto, Fauth, L., & de Oliveira Reis Brandao, M. (2018). Web of Science: Showing a bug today that can mislead scientific research output prediction. Information Development (pp. 1–7). Thousand Oaks: Sage Open.Google Scholar
  2. Bornmann, L. (2014). h-index research in scientometrics: A summary. Journal of Informetrics, 3(8), 749–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnhill, P., Hartley, J., & Davies, L. (1980). Lined paper, legibility and creativity. In J. Hartley (Ed.), The psychology of written communication (pp. 82–91). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  4. Casson, N. J. (2018). Collaborative research skills should be meaningfully incorporated into undergraduate programmes. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/20.
  5. Costas, R., & Franssen, T. (2018). Reflections around ‘the cautionary use’ of the h-index: Response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobranski. Scientometrics, 115(2), 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fassin, Y. (2018). A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame index for academics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(11), 1396–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartley, J. (2013). Reading, writing, speaking and listening: Perspectives in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartley, J. (2017). Authors and their citations: A point of view. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1081–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley, J. (2018a). Are academic papers written with students cited as often as academic papers written with colleagues? SRHE News Blog, 18th September, 2018.Google Scholar
  10. Hartley, J. (2018b). Have you chosen the title for your thesis yet? PsyPag Quarterly, 108 (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  12. Sugimoto, C. R., & Mostafa, J. (2018). Editorial: A note of concern and context: On careful use of terminologies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobranski, J. (2018). Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for academic purposes. Scientometrics, 115(2), 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyKeele UniversityStaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations