Some reflections on being cited 10,000 times
This letter describes the author’s reactions to being cited 10,000 times in Google Scholar. Data are provided to illustrate differences between the numbers of citations for books and edited works and between papers on different topics and in different styles.
KeywordsGoogle Scholar Academic writing Titles Writing alone or together
I am grateful to Guillaume Cabanac and Ivor Davies for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- Batista, P. D., Marques-Carneiro, I., de Almeida, Hermeto, Fauth, L., & de Oliveira Reis Brandao, M. (2018). Web of Science: Showing a bug today that can mislead scientific research output prediction. Information Development (pp. 1–7). Thousand Oaks: Sage Open.Google Scholar
- Burnhill, P., Hartley, J., & Davies, L. (1980). Lined paper, legibility and creativity. In J. Hartley (Ed.), The psychology of written communication (pp. 82–91). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Casson, N. J. (2018). Collaborative research skills should be meaningfully incorporated into undergraduate programmes. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/20.
- Hartley, J. (2018a). Are academic papers written with students cited as often as academic papers written with colleagues? SRHE News Blog, 18th September, 2018.Google Scholar
- Hartley, J. (2018b). Have you chosen the title for your thesis yet? PsyPag Quarterly, 108 (in press).Google Scholar
- Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar