Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 1841–1852 | Cite as

Sleeping beauties with no prince based on the co-citation criterion

  • ZhangJian Zong
  • XuanZhen LiuEmail author
  • Hui Fang
Article
  • 394 Downloads

Abstract

In science, a sleeping beauty (SB) refers to a highly cited paper that initially remains unnoticed for several years after publication. It is generally recognized that each SB is awoken by princes, in the form of other papers that cite the SB. Investigations have shown that one feature of a prince is that it has a considerable number of co-citations with the SB. In the present study, we applied a method to screen for princes from among papers citing the SB based on the number of co-citations in the Web of Science and identified four SBs that were awoken without a prince based on the co-citation criterion. There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon. The first is that some SBs may not need a prince to attract the attention of other academics. The authors of three of the four abovementioned SBs were Nobel laureates, and their work was well known in their respective fields. The papers had slept for a long period because their work was ahead of its time. The long period of sleep is a reflection of the authors’ high academic level and degree of insight. The other potential explanation is that princes do not have to be co-cited with SBs. Our findings demonstrate a significant deficiency in the previous criteria relating to princes based on co-citations. Thus, new criteria are required to identify princes.

Keywords

Sleeping beauties Princes Co-citation Ahead of time Nobel laureate 

References

  1. Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134(3479), 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On sleeping beauties, princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76(2), 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corry, L., Renn, J., & Stachel, J. (1997). Belated decision in the Hilbert–Einstein priority dispute. Science, 278(5341), 1270–1273.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a “sellbydate”? A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dey, R., Roy, A., Chakraborty, T., & Ghosh, S. (2017). Sleeping beauties in Computer Science: Characterization and early identification. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1645–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du, J., & Wu, Y. (2016). A bibliometric framework for identifying “princes” who wake up the “sleeping beauty” in challenge-type scientific discoveries. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(1), 50–68.Google Scholar
  8. Du, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science. In 16th International conference on scientometrics & informetrics (pp. 148–157). Wuhan, China.Google Scholar
  9. Einstein, A. (1915). The field equations of gravity. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.), 2, 844–847.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrarese, L., & Ford, H. (2005). Supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei: Past, present and future research. Space Science Reviews, 116(3–4), 523–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition—why? Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 488–493. (also in Current Contents, 21, 5–10).Google Scholar
  12. Garfield, E. (1989). Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: Citation frequency analysis aids the search for case histories. Current Contents, 23, 3–9.Google Scholar
  13. Garfield, E. (1990). More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy. Essays of an Information Scientist, 13, 68–74. (also in Current Contents, 9, 3–9).Google Scholar
  14. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorry, P., & Aichouchi, A. E. (2017). Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review: A case study of Judah Folkman hypothesis on angiogenesis. In 16 th International conference on scientometrics & informetrics (pp. 778–786). Wuhan, China.Google Scholar
  16. Hartley, J., & Ho, Y.-S. (2017). Who woke the sleeping beauties in psychology? Scientometrics, 112(2), 1065–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho, Y.-S., & Hartley, J. (2017). Sleeping beauties in psychology. Scientometrics, 110(1), 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). Propagation of electrical signals along giant nerve fibres. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B—Biological Sciences, 140(899), 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426–7431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkaldy, J. S. (1992). Spontaneous evolution of spatiotemporal patterns in materials. Reports on Progress in Physics, 55(6), 723–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, J. (2014). Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”. Scientometrics, 100(2), 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, J., & Shi, D. (2016). Sleeping beauties in genius work: When were they awakened? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, J., Shi, D., Zhao, S. X., & Ye, F. Y. (2014). A study of the ‘‘heartbeat spectra’’ for ‘‘sleeping beauties’’. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92(3), 795–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Min, C., Sun, J., Pei, L., & Ding, Y. (2016). Measuring delayed recognition for papers: Uneven weightedsummation and total citations. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1153–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics, 93(2), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostwald, W. (1900). On the assumed isomerism of red and yellow mercury oxide and the surface-tension of solid bodies. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische ChemieE–Stochiometrie Und Verwandtschaftslehre, 34(4), 495–503.Google Scholar
  28. Patterson, A. L. (1939). The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Physical Review, 56(10), 978–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scherrer, P. (1918). Estimation of size and internal structure of colloidal particles by means of Röntgen rays. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 2, 96–100.Google Scholar
  30. Sun, J., Min, C., & Li, J. (2016). A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles. Scientometrics, 107(2), 745–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teixeira, A. A. C., Vieira, P. C., & Abreu, A. P. (2017). Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies. Scientometrics, 110(2), 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Raan, A. F. J. (2015). Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Lloyd_Hodgkin. Accessed April 5, 2018.
  35. Ye, F. Y., & Bornmann, L. (2018). “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Electronic Science and EngineeringNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations