Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 805–823 | Cite as

Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario

  • Cleusa PavanEmail author
  • Marcia C. Barbosa
Article

Abstract

The article processing charge (APC) provides economic sustainability for scientific journals that publish in open access (OA). In this work, documents published in OA between 2012 and 2016 by authors with Brazilian affiliation are identified, the profile of these publications is analyzed and the cost of APC is estimated. In order to do so, data from 930 journals and 63,847 documents were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection. It was found that 59% of these documents were published in journals that charge APC. The total expenditures for the 5-year period were estimated at approximately USD 36 million, the weighted average cost per document at USD 957.75 and the average cost per journal at USD 1492.27. The profile of these publications shows that journals indexed by SciELO represent 67% of the 63,847 documents. The use of mega-journals increased over the period, which implies an increase in expenditure in publications, since the average APC per journal was USD 2059.77. It was observed that the OA Brazilian scientific production is characterized by an endogenic profile and has a preference for the Gold road with APC. These results suggest that policies for funding charges are required to stimulate a more international attitude.

Keywords

Article processing charge Open access Public funding Scientific journal 

Mathematics Subject Classification

00A99 

JEL Classification

Z00 

References

  1. Alperin, J. P., & Fischman, G. E. (2015). Scientific journals made in Latin America. In J. P. Alperin & G. E. Fischman (Eds.), Made in Latin American: open access, scholarly journals, and regional innovations (pp. 103–112). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: CLACSO. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20150921045253/MadeInLatinAmerica.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2017.
  2. Archambault, E., et al. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels19962013. [S.l]: European Commission. http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports/proportion-of-open-access-papers-published-in-peer-reviewed-journals-at-the. Accessed 14 October 2017.
  3. Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Pricing principles used by scholarly open access publishers. Learned Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1087/20120207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björk, B.-C. & Solomon, D. (2014). Development an effective market for open access article processing charge. London: Welcome Trust. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/developing-effective-market-for-open-access-article-processing-charges-mar14.pdf. Accessed 28 Septrmber 2017.
  5. CAPES. (2017a). Notícias. Conselho Consultivo do PAAP se reúne na CAPES para debater temas importantes. http://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/?option=com_pnews&component=NewsShow&view=pnewsnewsshow&cid=533&mn=0. Accessed 20 August 2017.
  6. CAPES. (2017b). Relatório de gestão do exercício de 2016. Brasília, 2017. http://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/acessoainformacao/Relatorio_de_Gestao_CAPES_2016.pdf. Accessed 20 August 2017.
  7. Clarivate Analytics. (2017). Source publication list for Web of Science. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/. Accessed 24 June 2017.
  8. CNPq. (2017). Painel de investimentos. Brasília, 2017. http://www.cnpq.br/painel-de-investimentos. Accessed 22 August 2017.
  9. Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1036-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, W. (2017). GOAJ2: Golden open access journals 20112016. Livermore: Cites & Insights Books. https://waltcrawford.name/goaj2.pdf. Accessed 03 October 2017.
  11. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., et al. (2011). The SOAP symposium—III Open access publishing today: What scientists do and why. SOAP symposium, January 13th, 2011, Berlin. http://edoc.mpg.de/524968. Accessed 22 June 2017.
  12. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2017). Directory of open access journals. https://doaj.org/search. Accessed 10 May 2017.
  13. Glanzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0055-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahn, N., & Tullney, M. (2016). A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany. PeerJ.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laakso, M., et al. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leta, J. (2012). Brazilian growth in the mainstream science: The role of human resources and national journals. Journal of Scientometric Research.  https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.2012.1.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leta, J., Costa, E. H. S., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2017). Artigos em periódicos de acesso aberto: um estudo com pesquisadores bolsistas de produtividade do CNPq. RECIIS-Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde, 11(supl), 6.Google Scholar
  18. Leta, J., Thijs, B., & Glanzel, W. (2013). A macro-level study of science in Brazil: Seven years later. Encontros Bibli.  https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2013v18n36p51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madham, M., et al. (2017). Should Indian researchers pay to get their work published? Current Science India, 112(4), 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrison, H., et al. (2015). Open access article processing charges: DOAJ survey 2014. Publications.  https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3010001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mueller, S. P. M. (2011). Produção e financiamento de periódicos científicos de acesso aberto: um estudo na base SciELO. In: D. A. Plobación et al. (Org.), Revistas Científicas: dos processos tradicionais às perspectivas alternativas de comunicação (pp. 201–230). Cotia: Ateliê Editorial.Google Scholar
  22. Packer, A. L., & Meneghini, R. (2014). O SciELO aos 15 anos: raison d’être, avanços e desafios para o futuro. In A. L. Packer et al. (Org.), SciELO15 anos de Acesso Aberto: um estudo analítico sobre acesso aberto e comunicação científica (pp. 15-28). Paris: UNESCO.  https://doi.org/10.7476/9789237012376.
  23. Packer, A. L., Santos, S., & Meneghini, R. (2017). SciELO Preprints a caminho. SciELO em Perspectiva. http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2017/02/22/scielo-preprints-a-caminho/. Accessed 30 October 2017.
  24. Pavan, C., & Barbosa, M. C. B. (2017). Financiamento público no Brasil para a publicação de artigos em acesso aberto: alguns apontamentos. Em Questão.  https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245232.120-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Research Councils UK. (2016). RCUK open access block grant analysis 2013/14, 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/oadocs/rcukapcreturnsanalysis2014-16-pdf/. Accessed 10 August 2017.
  26. Solomon, D. J. (2014). A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals. PeerJ.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B.-C. (2012a). Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B.-C. (2012b). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B.-C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication—The situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spezi, V., et al. (2017). Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strehl, L., et al. (2016). Brazilian science between national and foreign journals: Methodology for analyzing the production and impact in emerging scientific communities. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  34. Walters, H., & Linvill, A. (2011). Characteristics of open access journals in six subject areas. College & Research Libraries.  https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Welcome Trust Blog. (2015). The reckoning: An analysis of Welcome Trust open access spend 2013–14. https://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/03/03/the-reckoning-an-analysis-of-wellcome-trust-open-access-spend-2013-14/. Accessed 6 June 2018.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação em Ciências: Química da Vida e SaúdeUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto de FísicaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations