Advertisement

Fifteen years after September 11: Where is the medical research heading? A scientometric analysis

  • Doris Klingelhöfer
  • David A. Groneberg
  • Markus Braun
  • Dörthe Brüggmann
  • Jenny Jaque
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The attacks of 9-11 have been not only the cause of the deaths of thousands of people but have also had an enormous impact on the health of the survivors, the rescue workers, the fire fighters and many more people worldwide. This study aims to depict a representative global picture of the research output of 15 years after the attacks of 9-11 by analyzing the bibliometric data of the overall publications with particular focus on medical topics. This study subsequently deepens the scientometric approach of the overall terrorism research of Magnone in 2014, also published in Scientometrics. The USA has published the most by far, taking the absolute numbers into account. When evaluating citation or socio-economic ratios, Israel takes first place. The main collaborating partner of the USA is the UK, followed by Canada. The share of European countries is rising over time, linked with the terror attacks in European cities. There are only a few other countries involved. Prospective study approaches should be concentrated on international performances as a contribution in dealing with terrorism, its causes and its consequences. The improved access and involvement of other countries’ scientists in the research and publication processes by a greater network would be an important component in facing international terrorism.

Keywords

9-11 Scientometry Global publication output Disaster epidemiology Health effects Terrorism 

Notes

Author’s contribution

DK and DAG contributed to conception, design and analyses. DK, DB, JJ MB and DAG contributed to the interpretation of data. DK drafted the article. DK, DAG, MB, DB and JJ revised the article. DK, MB and DAG participated in the final approval of the manuscript.

Funding

There have been no financial supports.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

All data will be available via a public repository that is accessible by a provided link.

References

  1. Aldrich, T. K., Gustave, J., Hall, C. B., Cohen, H. W., Webber, M. P., Zeig-Owens, R., et al. (2010). Lung function in rescue workers at the World Trade Center after 7 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(14), 1263–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arie, S. (2016). THE BIG PICTURE Health effects of 9/11 terror attacks continue to grow. BMJ-British Medical Journal, 354, 1.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Banauch, G. I., Hall, C., Weiden, M., Cohen, H. W., Aldrich, T. K., Christodoulou, V., et al. (2006). Pulmonary function after exposure to the World Trade Center collapse in the New York City Fire Department. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174(3), 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleich, A., Gelkopf, M., & Solomon, Z. (2003). Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms, and coping behaviors among a nationally representative sample in Israel. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(5), 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience—Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowler, R. M., Kornblith, E. S., Li, J., Adams, S. W., Gocheva, V. V., Schwarzer, R., et al. (2016). Police officers who responded to 9/11: Comorbidity of PTSD, depression, and anxiety 10–11 years later. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 59(6), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brackbill, R. M., Hadler, J. L., DiGrande, L., Ekenga, C. C., Farfel, M. R., Friedman, S., et al. (2009). Asthma and posttraumatic stress symptoms 5–6 years following exposure to the World Trade Center terrorist attack. JAMA, 302(5), 502–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brackbill, R. M., Thorpe, L. E., DiGrande, L., Perrin, M., Sapp, J. H., 2nd, Wu, D., et al. (2006). Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 55(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  10. Bruggmann, D., Wagner, C., Klingelhofer, D., Schoffel, N., Bendels, M., Louwen, F., et al. (2017). Maternal depression research: Socioeconomic analysis and density-equalizing mapping of the global research architecture. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 20(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4(1), 3–22.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catala-Lopez, F., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Hutton, B., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Moher, D. (2014). Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis. BMC Medicine, 12, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, N., & Silver, R. C. (2011). Growing up in the shadow of terrorism: Youth in America after 9/11. American Psychologist, 66(6), 468–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(13), 982–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galea, S., Vlahov, D., Resnick, H., Ahern, J., Susser, E., Gold, J., et al. (2003). Trends of probable post-traumatic stress disorder in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(6), 514–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galea, S., Nandi, A., & Vlahov, D. (2005). The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27, 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gargano, L. M., Gershon, R. R., & Brackbill, R. M. (2016). Quality of life of persons injured on 9/11: Qualitative analysis from the World Trade Center Health Registry. PLoS Currents.  https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.7c70f66c1e6c5f41b43c797cb2a0479.Google Scholar
  19. Gargano, L. M., Welch, A. E., & Stellman, S. D. (2017). Substance use in adolescents 10 years after the World Trade Center attacks in New York City. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 26(1), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gastner, M. T., & Newman, M. E. (2004). From the cover: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(20), 7499–7504.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerber, A., Klingelhoefer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Bundschuh, M. (2014). Silicosis: Geographic changes in research: An analysis employing density-equalizing mapping. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 9(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldmann, E., & Galea, S. (2014). Mental health consequences of disasters. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(35), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grabbe, C. (2010). Discussion of “Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis” by K. A. Seffen. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 136(4), 538–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groneberg, D. A., Geier, V., Klingelhofer, D., Gerber, A., Kuch, U., & Kloft, B. (2016). Snakebite Envenoming—a combined density equalizing mapping and scientometric analysis of the publication history. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(11), e0005046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Fischer, T. C., Quarcoo, D., & Scutaru, C. (2009). New quality and quantity indices in science (NewQIS): The study protocol of an international project. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 4, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hersh, E. D. (2013). Long-term effect of September 11 on the political behavior of victims’ families and neighbors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(52), 20959–20963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan, H. T., Stellman, S. D., Morabia, A., Miller-Archie, S. A., Alper, H., Laskaris, Z., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in relation to exposure to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2(5), e000431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, C. L., Smith, R., Silverton, M., Holmes, A., Bravo, C., Jones, K., et al. (2006). A mental health program for ground zero rescue and recovery workers: Cases and observations. Psychiatric Services, 57(9), 1335–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelen, G., & Sauer, L. M. (2008). Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 3(6), 369–376.Google Scholar
  31. Kostadinov, V. (2011). Developing new methodology for nuclear power plants vulnerability assessment. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241(3), 950–956.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koster, C., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Schwarzer, M. (2016). Rotavirus—Global research density equalizing mapping and gender analysis. Vaccine, 34(1), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kvetan, V. (2001). The World Trade Center attack. Is critical care prepared for terrorism? Critical Care, 5(6), 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitt, J. T., Malta, L. S., Martin, A., Davis, L., & Cloitre, M. (2007). The flexible application of a manualized treatment for PTSD symptoms and functional impairment related to the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(7), 1419–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lioy, P. J., Weisel, C. P., Millette, J. R., Eisenreich, S., Vallero, D., Offenberg, J., et al. (2002). Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(7), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magnone, E. (2014). The extreme case of terrorism: A scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mattox, K. (2001). The World Trade Center attack. Disaster preparedness: Health care is ready, but is the bureaucracy? Critical Care, 5(6), 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M. J., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. A. (2011). The distinct roles of spirituality and religiosity in physical and mental health after collective trauma: A national longitudinal study of responses to the 9/11 attacks. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34(6), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miguel-Tobal, J. J., Cano-Vindel, A., Gonzalez-Ordi, H., Iruarrizaga, I., Rudenstine, S., Vlahov, D., et al. (2006). PTSD and depression after the Madrid March 11 train bombings. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(1), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moir, W., Zeig-Owens, R., Daniels, R. D., Hall, C. B., Webber, M. P., Jaber, N., et al. (2016). Post-9/11 cancer incidence in World Trade Center-exposed New York City firefighters as compared to a pooled cohort of firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (9/11/2001–2009). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 59(9), 722–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moline, J., Herbert, R., & Nguyen, N. (2006). Health consequences of the September 11 World Trade Center attacks: A review. Cancer Investigation, 24(3), 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mullett-Hume, E., Anshel, D., Guevara, V., & Cloitre, M. (2008). Cumulative trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder among children exposed to the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(1), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mund, M., Kloft, B., Bundschuh, M., Klingelhoefer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Gerber, A. (2014). Global research on smoking and pregnancy-a scientometric and gender analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(6), 5792–5806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostfeld, A., Uber, J. G., Salomons, E., Berry, J. W., Hart, W. E., Phillips, C. A., et al. (2008). The battle of the water sensor networks (BWSN): A design challenge for engineers and algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 134(6), 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pandya, A., Katz, C. L., Smith, R., Ng, A. T., Tafoya, M., Holmes, A., et al. (2010). Services provided by volunteer psychiatrists after 9/11 at the New York City family assistance center: September 12–November 20, 2001. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 16(3), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pleil, J. D., Vette, A. F., Johnson, B. A., & Rappaport, S. M. (2004). Air levels of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons after the World Trade Center disaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(32), 11685–11688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prezant, D. J., Weiden, M., Banauch, G. I., McGuinness, G., Rom, W. N., Aldrich, T. K., et al. (2002). Cough and bronchial responsiveness in firefighters at the World Trade Center site. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(11), 806–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quarcoo, D., Bruggmann, D., Klingelhofer, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2015). Ebola and its global research architecture—need for an improvement. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9(9), e0004083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17268–17272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sageman, M. (2014). The stagnation in terrorism research, terrorism and political violence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(4), 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B. K., Rourke, K. M., Wilson, D., Thalji, L., Dennis, J. M., Fairbank, J. A., & Kulka, R. A. (2002). Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the National Study of Americans’ Reactions to September 11. JAMA, 288(5), 581–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schreiber, M., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Bruggmann, D. (2016). Patient safety: The landscape of the global research output and gender distribution. British Medical Journal Open, 6(2), e008322.Google Scholar
  53. Schuster, M. A., Stein, B. D., Jaycox, L., Collins, R. L., Marshall, G. N., Elliott, M. N., et al. (2001). A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(20), 1507–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seffen, K. (2008). Progressive collapse of the World Trade Center: Simple analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 134(2), 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silke, A. (2008). Research on terrorism, a review of the impact of 9/11 and the global war on terrorism. In H. Chen, E. Reid, J. Sinai, A. Silke, & B. Ganor (Eds.), Terrorism informatics, knowledge managment and data mining for homeland security (pp. 27–50). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Silver, R. C., Holman, E. A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA, 288(10), 1235–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Silver, R. C., & Matthew, R. (2008). Terrorism. In V. N. Parrillo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social problems (Vol. 2, pp. 926–929). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Simensen, C. (2014). A theory for the collapse of the Word Trade Center, SINTEF, Norway. Engineering Failure Analysis, 41, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stallings, J., Vance, E., Yang, J. S., Vannier, M. W., Liang, J. M., Pang, L. J., et al. (2013). Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(24), 9680–9685.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Stamell, E. F., Foltin, G. L., & Nadler, E. P. (2009). Lessons learned for pediatric disaster preparedness from September 11, 2001: New York City trauma centers. Journal of Trauma, 67(2 Suppl), S84–S87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 959–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tosone, C., McTighe, J. P., Bauwens, J., & Naturale, A. (2011). Shared traumatic stress and the long-term impact of 9/11 on Manhattan clinicians. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(5), 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Updegraff, J. A., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. A. (2008). Searching for and finding meaning in collective trauma: Results from a national longitudinal study of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vossbrinck, M., Zeig-Owens, R., Hall, C. B., Schwartz, T., Moir, W., Webber, M. P., Cohen, H. W., Nolan, A., Weiden, M. D., Christodoulou, V., Kelly, K. J., Aldrich, T. K., & Prezant, D. J. (2017). Post-9/11/2001 lung function trajectories by sex and race in World Trade Center-exposed New York City emergency medical service workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 74(3), 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. World Trade Center Health Program. Covered conditions. URL https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/conditions.html. Accessed 2016 Dec, updated 2016 Aug.
  66. Wyndham, J. D. (2017). Peer review in controversial topics—a case study of 9/11. Publications, 5(2), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeig-Owens, R., Webber, M. P., Hall, C. B., Schwartz, T., Jaber, N., Weakley, J., et al. (2011). Early assessment of cancer outcomes in New York City firefighters after the 9/11 attacks: An observational cohort study. Lancet, 378(9794), 898–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, University HospitalGoethe-UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LA County Hospital and Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations