The resilience of regional African HIV/AIDS research networks to the withdrawal of international authors in the subfield of public administration and governance: lessons for funders and collaborators
- 228 Downloads
This paper compares the position and performance of Africans in international research networks, comparing a well-funded and internationally driven research network against a network developing organically with less funding and oversight. Specifically, we map the co-authorship networks related to African governance and public policy (1) in general and (2) related to HIV/AIDS. In both research networks Africans are well positioned globally, but African authors have lower connectivity and status in the HIV/AIDS network than the general network. Links between authors in different African countries are often bridged by non-Africans. This makes the African research networks vulnerable to shifting funding priorities; and international dropout would fragment the HIV/AIDS network more than the general network. We conclude that funders and researchers should prioritize direct inter-country African collaborations to improve the resilience of African research networks.
KeywordsBibliometric analysis African scholarship Research networks Funding priorities
This work was supported by the Programme of Strategic Cooperation between Irish Aid and Higher Education Authority.
- AVAC. (2015). HIV prevention research & development funding trends 2000–2014. http://www.avac.org/resource/hiv-prevention-research-development-funding-trends-2000-2014-investing-innovation-evolvin-0. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
- Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Deccio, C. T., Matthew Smith, S. C., Wan, J., Clement, M., & Snell, Q. (2003). Survivability of large networks in the presence of malicious attacks. Retrieved from http://dna.cs.byu.edu/papers/pdf/survive.pdf. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
- Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific collaboration through coauthorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kates, J., Wexler, A., & Lief, E. (2016). Financing the response to HIV in low- and middle-income countries: international assistance from donor governments in 2015. Technical report, UNAIDS & The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/financing-the-response-to-HIV-in-low-and-middle-income-countries_en.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2017.
- Sall, E. (2010). World social science report: Knowledge divides, chapter 1.2. In F. Caillods (Ed.), The view from the regions: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool for Windows, Version 1.2. https://sci2.cns.iu.edu/user/index.php. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
- Zumla, A., Huggett, J., Dheda, K., Green, C., Kapata, N., & Mwaba, P. (2010). Trials and tribulations of an African-led research and capacity development programme: The case for EDCTP investments. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 15(4), 489–494.Google Scholar