Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 191–209 | Cite as

Research or management? An investigation of the impact of leadership roles on the research performance of academic administrators

  • Wen Lou
  • Yuehua Zhao
  • Yuchen Chen
  • Jin Zhang
Article

Abstract

This study quantitatively investigated whether the research performance of academic administrators (leaders) was affected by their administrative services. We sampled 111 academic administrators, including 90 department deans and 21 university presidents, from 26 universities. These leaders’ research performance was determined by the number of their publications and citations in the Web of Science databases. To compare the effect on their research performance by their administrative roles, we proposed four periods: the pre-position period, the latest position period, the reference period, and the in-position period. Statistical methods were applied to compare the research performance of the sampled administrators before and after they accepted the current administrative roles. The results suggest that 80% of academic leaders’ productivity and citation have fallen by 42 and 62% averagely. The extent of such impact varied in different disciplines. Leaders’ performance in medicine fields has declined the most (60%). The impact on research productivity appeared to be stronger for administrators serving in higher-ranking universities. In addition, the research performance of both university presidents and department deans were substantially influenced by their administrative services.

Keywords

Research performance Leadership Administrative roles Career path 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study is an extended version of an article (Zhao et al. 2017) presented at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan (China), 16–20 October 2017. This study is funded by Peak Discipline Construction Project of Education at East China Normal University and “Chenguang Program” supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 17CG19) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017M620142).

References

  1. Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, O. L. (2014). Self-other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates’ job satisfaction and turnover intention. Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 784–800.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banal-Estañol, A., Macho-Stadler, I., & Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2013). Research output from university–industry collaborative projects. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 71–81.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412472535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyko, L., & Jones, G. A. (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. Higher Education Dynamics, 33, 83–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. B. (1991). Career paths of department chairs: A national perspective. Research in Higher Education, 32(6), 669–688.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, J. B., & Wolverton, M. (2004). Who becomes a chair? New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/he.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84(4), 958–977.  https://doi.org/10.1086/226868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Terry Orr, M., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for changing world: Lessons from exemlary leadership development programs. Stanford Educational Leadership (SELI).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
  11. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Figlio, D. N., & Schapiro, M. (2017). Are great teachers poor scholars? Evidence Speaks Reports, 2. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/es_20170126_figlio_evidence_speaks.pdf
  13. García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Martín-Montaner, J., & Pérez-Amaral, T. (2015). (How) Do research and administrative duties affect university professors’ teaching? Applied Economics, 47(45), 4868–4883.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1037438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzales, L., & Rincones, R. (2013). Using Participatory Action Research and Photo Methods to Explore Higher Education Administration as an Emotional Endeavor. Qualitative Report, 18(c), 1–17. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=10520147&AN=89736512&h=yajBw/kWJy9Db5TZEFqMc1b966h6vEbW++12ZnpeW64sQeIgE07I4Kl00t2wHPTKT5Cnwdr+btL4/65IZ/bOWQ==&crl=c.
  15. Gu, L., Ding, K., & Yan, W. (2014). Management or productivity: A scientometric analysis on the role of presidents of 6 universities. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 8(1), 81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2014.916865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heneberg, P. (2013). Effects of print publication lag in dual format journals on scientometric indicators. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e59877.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu, Y., Van Der Rijst, R., Van Veen, K., & Verloop, N. (2015). The role of research in teaching: A comparison of teachers from research universities and those from universities of applied sciences. Higher Education Policy, 28(4), 535–554.  https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, B., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In Handbook of genius (pp. 422–450).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  20. Kremer-Hayon, L., & Avi-Itzhak, T. E. (1986). Roles of academic department chairpersons at the university level—Perceptions and satisfaction. Higher Education, 15(1–2), 105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a.Google Scholar
  22. Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magana, A. E., & Niebel, B. W. (1976). How do academic administrators spend-and think they spend-their time? Engineering Education, 67(2), 195–197.Google Scholar
  24. Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Carrión-García, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2009). The effects of university–industry relationships and academic research on scientific performance: Synergy or substitution? Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 795–811.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9142-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meier, L. L., Gross, S., Spector, P. E., & Semmer, N. K. (2013). Relationship and task conflict at work: Interactive short-term effects on angry mood and somatic complaints. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, T. L., & Laipple, J. S. (2015). How prepared are academic administrators? Leadership and job satisfaction within US research universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(2), 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muma, R. D., Smith, B., & Somers, P. A. (2006). Use of Mintzberg’s model of managerial roles to evaluate academic administrators. Journal of Allied Health, 35(2), 65–74.Google Scholar
  28. Murray, D., Zhao, H., Minik, V., Bérubé, N., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2017). Are Great Researchers Terrible Teachers? How research and teaching performance relate at U.S. universities. In International conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics (pp. 1281–1287).Google Scholar
  29. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Crows Nest, NSW.: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  30. Petersen, A. M., Wang, F., & Stanley, H. E. (2010). Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 81(3), 36114.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036114.Google Scholar
  31. Rørstad, K., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position—A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saidapur, S. K. (2009). Honorarium to fellows of the scientific academies and SSB awardees: Need to link with performance and not age. Current Science, 97(4), 467–468.Google Scholar
  33. Sheikha, N. A. A., & Younis, A. R. M. (2006). Administrative factors affecting employees absenteeism in academic and public libraries in Jordan. International Information and Library Review, 38(2), 64–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2006.10762706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siddique, A., Aslam, H. D., Khan, M., & Fatima, U. (2011). Impact of academic leadership on faculty’s motivation and organizational effectiveness in higher education system. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 184–191.Google Scholar
  35. Tang, L., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2017). Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 790–794.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Werkema, J. R. (2009). Making sense of roles and responsibilities: A socialization study of college and university music department chairs. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, L. F., & Shin, J. C. (2015). The research–teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing. Mainland China. Higher Education, 70(3), 375–394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9836-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, G., Yu, G., Feng, Y., Liu, L., & Yang, Z. (2017). Improving the publication delay model to characterize the patent granting process. Scientometrics, 111(2), 621–637.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2324-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao, Y., Lou, W., & Chen, Y. (2017). Research or management? An investigation of the impact of administrative roles on the research performance of academic administrators. In: Proceedings of ISSI 2017—The 16th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Wuhan University, China, 1288–1294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute for Academic Evaluation and DevelopmentEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.School of Information StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin–MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.School of Information ManagementNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations