Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science
- 403 Downloads
Trends are analysed in the annual number of documents published by Russian institutions and indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, giving special attention to the time period starting in the year 2013 in which the Project 5-100 was launched by the Russian Government. Numbers are broken down by document type, publication language, type of source, research discipline, country and source. It is concluded that Russian publication counts strongly depend upon the database used, and upon changes in database coverage, and that one should be cautious when using indicators derived from WoS, and especially from Scopus, as tools in the measurement of research performance and international orientation of the Russian science system.
KeywordsScopus WoS Article Review Proceedings Compound annual growth rate Citation Russia Research discipline Project 5-100 Publication language
The authors wish to thank Dr Alexander Libkind from the All Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences (VINITI) for his comments on an earlier version of this paper. They are also grateful to two anonymous referees for their valuable comments on an earlier version of our manuscript.
This paper is partly supported by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (Grant: 17-02-00157)
- 5top100 (n.d.). https://5top100.ru/news/70290/.
- Beall, J. (n.d.). Scholarly open access. Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. https://web.archive.org/web/20161202192038/https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals.
- CSAB. (n.d.). https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content/scopus-content-selection-and-advisory-board. Last Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- CWTS. (n.d.). CWTS leiden ranking. Indicators. http://www.leidenranking.com/information/indicators.
- Decree 599. (2012). www.rg.ru/2012/05/09/nauka-dok.html.
- Elsevier. (n.d.). https://www.elsevier.com/?a=212275. Last Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- Graham, L. R. (1998). What have we learned about science and technology from the Russian experience?. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ivanov, V. V., Libkind, A. N., & Markusova, V. A. (2014). Publication activity and research cooperation between higher education institutions and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1134/s101933161401002x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khantemirov, R. (2014). RINTS: From primitive fraud (cheating?) to child molestation. Newspaper “Troitskii Variant”. N19.-6. https://trv-science.ru/2014/09/23/rints-ot-primitivnogo-moshennichestva-do-rastleniya-maloletnikh/.
- MICCEDU. (n.d.). Website of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science. http://indicators.miccedu.ru/monitoring/?m=vpo.
- Mindeli, L. (2013) (ed.). Russian Academy of Sciences in numbers (2013). Statistical issue. IPRAN RAS, Moscow.Google Scholar
- Mindeli, L. E., Ivanov, V. V., LIibkind, A. N., & Markusova, V. A. (2016). Domestic research collaboration based on co-authorship, Web of Science, 2006–2013. Scientific and Technical Information, 8, 13–23.Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics. Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-60521-0 (hard cover); 978-3-319-60522-7 (E-Book), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7, XXI + 312 pp.
- Neicon. (2017). The 5th NEICON international conference “electronic resources for research and education: Development, promotion and use”. Jesolo, Italy, 25 Sept–1 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
- “Predatory Open Access”, n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_open_access_publishing.
- Savina, T., & Sterligov, I. (2016). Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in scopus on the country level. https://figshare.com/articles/Potentially_Predatory_Journals_in_Scopus_Descriptive_Statistics_and_Country-level_Dynamics_NWB_2016_presentation_slides_/4249394RISC (n.d.). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Science_Citation_Index. Last Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Schiermeier, Q. (2012). Higher education: Russia shakes up its universities. Nature, 492, 120.Google Scholar
- Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring Science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 19–50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar