Scientometrics

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 749–766 | Cite as

Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals

Article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

The extent of publishing in predatory journals in economics is examined. A simple model of researcher behavior is presented to explore those factors motivating an academic to publish in predatory journals as defined by Beall (Criteria for determining predatory open access publishers, Unpublished document, 3rd edn, 2015. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/). Beall’s lists are used to identify predatory journals included in the Research Papers in Economics archives. The affiliations of authors publishing in these outlets indicate that the geographic dispersion of authorship is widespread. A very small subset of authors is registered on RePEc. A surprising number of authors who are in the RePEc top 5% also published in predatory journals in 2015.

Keywords

Predatory journals Research Papers in Economics Open access 

JEL Classification

A10 I20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the anonymous referee for thoughtful and useful comments. For their helpful remarks and suggestions we thank the participants in the Crime and Microeconomic Topics session at the Western Economics Association meetings in Portland, Oregon, June 29 to July 3, 2016. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Beall, J. (2015). Criteria for determining predatory open access publishers. Unpublished document, 3rd ed. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/. Downloaded March 4, 2016.
  2. Blog: Research Papers in Economics. (2016). Quality Control Committee: Looking for Volunteer. https://blog.repec.org/.
  3. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabell’s International. https://www.cabells.com. Consulted January 9, 2017.
  5. Card, D., & DellaVigna, S. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2017). https://doaj.org/. Consulted on January 8, 2017.
  7. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2017). DOAJ_Journals Added and Removed.xlsx, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/183mRBRqs2jOyP0qZWXN8dUd02D4vL0Mov_kgYF8HORM/edit#gid=0. Downloaded January 8, 2017.
  8. Djuric, D. (2015). Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: The Romanian connection. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graziotin, D., Wang, X., & Abrahamsonn, P. (2014). A framework of systematic analysis of open access journals and its application in software engineering and information systems. Scientometrics, 101, 1627–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ideas/RePEc Aggregate Rankings (Last Ten Years) for Journals (2015). Ideas. Research Papers in Economics, https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.journals.all10.html. Accessed December 13.
  11. Ideas/RePEc Authors (2016). Author Information. Research Papers in Economics, https://ideas.repec.org/i/e.html.
  12. Mazières, D. & Kohler, E. (2005). Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List, Unpublished paper. Downloaded on May 20, 2016 from https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/20/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-laced-anti-spam-paper/.
  13. Omobowale, A. O., Akanle, O., Adeniran, A. I., & Adegboyega, K. (2014). Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria. Current Sociology, 62, 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pyne, D. (2017). The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school. Journal of Scholarly Publishing., 48, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shen, C., & Björk, B. (2015). Predatory open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. West, J. D., Bergstrom, T., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2014). Cost effectiveness of open access publications. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xia, J. (2015). Predatory journals and their article publishing charges. Learned Publishing, 28, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in ‘predatory’ journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1406–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zimmermann, C. (2012). Academic rankings with RePEc, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis working paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceGulf University for Science and TechnologyWest MishrefKuwait
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsAppalachian State UniversityBooneUSA

Personalised recommendations