Scientometrics

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 1115–1117 | Cite as

Comments on the Letter to the Editor on “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes” by Jaime A. Teixera da Silva and Judit Dobránszki

Article

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—A comparison of WoS. Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.Google Scholar
  2. Elsevier. (2017). Scopus content coverage guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/0597-Scopus-Content-Coverage-Guide-US-LETTER-v4-HI-singles-no-ticks.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
  3. Ruiz-Pérez, R., Delgado-Lopez-Cózar, E., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2003). Spanish name indexing errors in international databases. The Lancet, 361(9369), 1656–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ruiz-Pérez, R., López-Cózar, E. D., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2002). Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: Implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(4), 411–430.Google Scholar
  5. Teixera da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2018). Multiple versions of the h-index: Cautionary use for formal academic purposes. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2680-3.
  6. Testa, J. (2009). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Transnational Corporations Review, 1(4), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations