A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation
- 1k Downloads
An article recently published in Scientometrics sheds light on the way ResearchGate works in calculating its RG score, which seems to be affected primarily by the members’ engagement in the social network environment, and only secondarily by publications. Here we show that the will to understand the rationale behind the score should also consider the ratio between full-text sources uploaded to the repository and publications. The finding supports the claim that the RG score is not a reliable indicator of scientific and academic reputation. Instead, it appears to be much more a tool to implement the entrepreneurial strategy of the RG’s owner company.
KeywordsScholarly social network ResearchGate RG score Academic reputation Bibliometrics Altmetrics
Here we make use of some data that, for brevity’s sake, are not included in the text. Since we aim to improve our RG score, these data are freely available in our RG pages.
- Dewett, T., & Denisi, A. S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: It’s more than just productivity. Scientometrics, 60(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2016). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jordan, K. (2015). Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: Reflections and implications for practice. Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 1–3. http://ascw.know-center.tugraz.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ASCW15jordanresponsekraker-lex.pdf%5CnCopyright. Accessed 13 June 2017.
- Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation. In ASCW’15 Workshop at Web Science 2015, (May), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.35401.
- Ortega, J. L. (2016). Social network sites for scientists (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control? Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 847–857).Google Scholar