Factors influencing the formation of intra-institutional formal research groups: group prediction from collaboration, organisational, and topical networks
The factors that foster successful scientific collaboration and teamwork have been studied extensively. However, these factors have been studied in isolation and it is not clear to what extent one factor is more relevant than other in the formation of research groups. In this work we propose a new methodology based on network analysis to simultaneously evaluate multiple factors considered relevant in the conformation of formal research groups. Our methodology is supported on structural, statistical, and correlation analysis. In addition to validating our methodology with a case study at a research-teaching university, we introduce a new network to represent the success of scientific collaboration that produces the best prediction in group formation. Our methodology and the results obtained can be used for organising researchers in a university that seeks to strengthen its research strategy.
KeywordsScientific collaboration Network analysis Graph clustering Research groups Complex networks
Mathematics Subject Classification62H30 91D30 90C27
JEL ClassificationC61 C88
- Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Lan, X. (2006). Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’06 (pp. 44–54). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1150402.1150412.
- Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2011). The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography. Research Policy, 40(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.008. Special section on Heterogeneity and University-Industry Relations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. http://stacks.iop.org/1742-5468/2008/i=10/a=P10008.
- Cantu, F., & Ceballos, H. (2012). A framework for fostering multidisciplinary research collaboration and scientific networking within university environs. In J. Leibowitz (Ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook: Collaboration and Scientific Networking, Chap 12 (pp. 207–217). Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cantu, F., Ceballos, H., Mora, S., & Escoffie, M. (2005). A knowledge-based information system for managing research programs and value creation in a university environment. In Proceedings of the Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS (Vol. 2005, pp. 781–791).Google Scholar
- Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2008). Who collaborates successfully?: Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, CSCW’08 (pp. 437–446). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460633.
- Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hahn, J., Moon, J. Y., Zhang, C. (2006). Impact of social ties on open source project team formation. In IFIP international conference on open source systems (pp. 307–317). Springer.Google Scholar
- Kairam, S. R., Wang, D. J., & Leskovec, J. (2012). The life and death of online groups: Predicting group growth and longevity. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, WSDM’12 (pp. 673–682). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2124295.2124374.
- Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. In Proceedings of the sixth conference OD the international society for scientometric and informetric (pp. 163–175).Google Scholar
- Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993a). The discipline of teams. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993b). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Encyclopedia of creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1844–1851). Springer.Google Scholar
- Margolin, D., Ognyanoya, K., Huang, M., Huang, Y., & Contractor, N. (2012). Team formation and performance on Nanohub: A network selection challenge in scientific communities. In B. Vedres & M. Scotti (Eds.), Networks in social policy problems (pp. 80–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. In A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. Minnesota: ERIC.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64, 0104209v1.Google Scholar
- Owens, D. A., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Strategic formation of groups: Issues in task performance and team member selection. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1, 149–165.Google Scholar
- Putnam, L. L. (1992). Rethinking the nature of groups in organizations. Small Group Communication: A Reader, 6, 57–66.Google Scholar
- Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 101–133.Google Scholar
- Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., & José Martín-Sempere, M. (2007). Exploring social integration as a determinant of research activity, performance and prestige of scientists. Empirical evidence in the Biology and Biomedicine field. Scientometrics, 72(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1703-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaeffer, S. E. (2005). Stochastic local clustering for massive graphs (pp. 354–360). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11430919_42.
- Tomas-Folch, M., Mentado-Labao, T., & Ruiz-Ruiz, J. M. (2015). Las buenas prácticas en gestión de la investigación de las universidades mejores situadas en los rankings. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 23(105), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Zhu, G., Yam, R. C. M., & Guan, J. (2016). Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects: An ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1383–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar