Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp 1307–1324 | Cite as

The hot spot transformation in the research evolution of maker

  • Ying ChenEmail author
  • Can Wu
Article
  • 965 Downloads

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology together with the grassroots innovation has led to a new landmark of maker culture. Recently, a search with the query of ‘‘makerspace’’, ‘‘maker movement’’ and ‘‘maker culture’’ in Google Scholar found over 10,000 documents in total. As the volume of the literature grows rapidly, thus, a systematic review of maker research and its current challenges becomes essential. This study surveys the literature of maker between 1975 and 2016. The overall structure of its intellectual landscape is illustrated in terms of thematic concentrations of knowledge clusters of maker study, hot research categories and keywords, major contributing factors including contributing countries, organizations, and authors. Our review is based on 836 bibliographic records retrieved from the ISI Web of Science and visualized by the scientometric software of CiteSpace. This application results in comprehensive knowledge maps of maker research. The study identifies major intellectual cooperation network, co-occurrence keywords, research clusters and landmark articles, including: (1) the thematic clusters of ‘‘maker movement’’, ‘‘DIY culture and extended milieu’’, ‘‘craftsman hero’’ reflects the biggest knowledge base clusters of maker study. (2) “Physical computing”, “maker space”, “maker movement”, “3D printer” are the major frontiers of maker research based on analysis of citation burst. (3) In terms of contributing countries, institutions, authors, the major driving force of maker research is from the United States of America, England and Germany, with University of California Berkeley, Georgia Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology being major contributing institutions. Paulo Blikstein from Stanford University USA, Vasilis Kostakis from Tallinn University of Technology Estonia, Hans-Joachim Böhme from Technische Universität Ilmenau German all have published three articles and rank at the top of the author list.

Keywords

Maker Maker movement Makerspace Maker culture Scientometric review Knowledge mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to give great thanks to Professor Michael Keane of Curtin University Australia for valuable discussions and suggestions throughout this research. This work is supported by Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Zhejiang Province (13JDCB02Z); State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council (201508330629); 2015 High Education Research Project of High Education Association of Zhejiang Province (No.17); Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics High Education Research Project (No. JK201509); Hangzhou Dianzi University High Education Research Project (YB201620).

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blikstein, P. (2012). Bifocal modeling: A study on the learning outcomes of comparing physical and computational models linked in real time. In ACM international conference on multimodal interfaces (pp. 257–264).Google Scholar
  4. Böhme, H. J., Wilhelm, T., Key, J., Schauer, C., & Hempel, T. (2003). An approach to multi-modal human–machine interaction for intelligent service robots. Robotics & Autonomous Systems, 44(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014). Orphan drugs and rare diseases: A scientometric review (2000–2014). Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs, 2(7), 709–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dougherty, D. (2016). Free to make: How the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connecting. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 4, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  12. Hartley, J., Wen, W., & Li, S. (2015). Creative economy and culture: Challenges, changes and futures for the creative industries. London: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, T. (2016). A prehistory of the cloud. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Kindle Edition).Google Scholar
  14. Keane, M. (2016). Internet + China: Unleashing the innovative nation strategy. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries, 3(2), 68–74.Google Scholar
  15. Keane, M & Chen, Y. (2016). Sino Silicon Valley: Is China’s dream of innovation becoming a reality? Policy forum online. http://www.policyforum.net/sino-silicon-valley/. Accessed 27 Oct 2016.
  16. Keane, M., & Chen, Y. (2017). Digital China: From cultural presence to innovative nation. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 4, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 91–101). Edmonton: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., Dafermos, G., & Bauwens, M. (2015). Design global, manufacture local: exploring the contours of an emerging productive model. Futures, 73, 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2014). Production and governance in hackerspaces: A manifestation of commons-based peer production in the physical realm? International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(5), 1–19.Google Scholar
  20. Kouhia, A. (2015). The making-of: An autoethnographic cinema on the meanings of contemporary craft practicing for a young hobbyist. Textile, 13(3), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leadbeater, C. (2009). We think: Mass innovation, not mass production (2nd ed.). London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  22. Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The pro-am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  23. Li, X., Ma, M., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research—A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindtner, S. (2014). Hackerspaces and the Internet of Things in China: How makers are reinventing industrial production, innovation and the self. China Information, 28(2), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mellis, D. A., Buechley, L., Resnick, M. & Hartmann, B. (2016). Engaging amateurs in the design, fabrication, and assembly of electronic devices. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (DIS’16). ACM.Google Scholar
  27. O’Sullivan, D., & Igoe, T. (2004). Physical computing sensing and controlling the physical world with computers. Boston: Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
  28. Purdue, D., Dûrrschmidt, J., Jowers, P., & O’Doherty, R. (1997). DIY culture and extended milieux: LETS, veggie boxes and festivals. The Sociological Review, 45(4), 645–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qin, Q., & Nie, Y. (2016). ‘jiyu cipin fenxi he keshihua gongci wangluotu de guonei chuangke yanjiu redian fenxi’ (Analysis of domestic maker’s research hotspots based on frequency analysis and visualization of word network diagram). Xiandai jiaoyu jishu (Modern Educational Technology), 26(1), 113–119.Google Scholar
  30. Resnick, M. (2009). Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sheridan, K. M., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B. K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song, Z. & Wang, H. (2016). chuangye 2.0 shidai zhongguo chuangke wenhua fazhan ji duice yanjiu (Study on development strategies of the maker culture in China in Entrepreneurship 2.0 Era). Hebei xuekan (Hebei Academic Journal), 36(4):191–195.Google Scholar
  35. Tanenbaum, J. G., Antle, A. N. & Robinson, J. (2013). Three perspectives on behavior change for serious games. In: Sigchi conference on human factors in computing system (pp. 3389–3392).Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, N. & Connolly, P. (2016). Making community: The wider role of makerspaces in public life. In: Sigchi conference on human factors in computing system (pp. 1415–1425).Google Scholar
  37. Wang, W. (2015). woguo chuangke kongjian yanjiu redian keshihua fenxi (Visualization analysis on research hotspots of makerspace in China). Xiandai qingbao (Journal of Modern Information), 35(12), 92–98.Google Scholar
  38. Xie, B. (2016). China’s innovation & entrepreneurship report 2016. Biaozhun007.com online. http://www.useit.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=13652. Accessed 10 Sept 2016.
  39. Xu, G. & Lin, G. (2016). Gongzhong canyu chuangxin de shehui wangluo: chuangke wenhua yu chuangke kongjian (Public participation of innovation: Maker culture and makerspaces). Kexuexue yu kexue jishu guanli (Science of Science and Management of Science & Technology), 37(2):11–20.Google Scholar
  40. Xu, S., & Li, Z. (2014). ‘gongzhong canyu chuangxin de shehui wangluo: chuangke yundong yu chuangke kongjian’ (Public participation of innovation: Maker movement and makerspaces). Kexuexue yanjiu (Studies in Science of Science), 32(12), 1789–1796.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationZhejiang University of Finance and EconomicsHangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringHangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations