Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 83–103 | Cite as

Does intersectoral labour mobility pay for academics?

  • Timo TohmoEmail author
  • Jutta Viinikainen
Article

Abstract

Labour mobility plays a significant role in the diffusion of knowledge and economic growth. In this study, we examined academics’ incentives for mobility among university, private sector and government jobs. Using register data on doctoral degree holders in Finland, we found that moving from academia to the private sector is related to higher subsequent earnings, particularly among young academics and in hard sciences. However, frequent mobility across sectors was related to lower subsequent earnings.

Keywords

Mobility Academics Triple helix Academia Private sector Public sector Wage Earnings 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Strategic Research Council (SRC) at the Academy of Finland for the project “Beyond MALPE-coordination: Integrative envisioning” (Number 303552). We also thank anonymous referees, Merja Kauhanen and Kristian Koerselman for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Stein, J. C. (2008). Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 39(3), 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2006). Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslesen, H. W., Isaksen, A., & Stambol, L. S. (2008). Knowledge-intensive business service as innovation agent through client interaction and labour mobility. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 9(2), 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azoulay, P., Ganguli, I., & Graff Zivin, J. S. (2017). The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants. Research Policy, 46(3), 573–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carless, S. A. (2005). Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo, V., Figal-Garone, F., Maffioli, A., Rojo, S., & Stucchi, R. (2016). The effects of knowledge spillovers through labor mobility. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69141/1/MPRA_paper_69141.pdf.
  9. Chen, Y., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2008). Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics, 64(3), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Compton, J., & Pollak, R. A. (2007). Why are power couples increasingly concentrated in large metropolitan areas? Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 475–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costal, G., Pickup, L., & Di Martino, V. (1988). Commuting-a further stress factor for working people: Evidence from the European Community. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 60(5), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2007). Labour mobility of university inventors in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., & Schneider, C. (2008). Commercializing academic research: The quality of faculty patenting. ZEW discussion paper no. 08-069. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Ejsing, A.-K., Kaiser, U., & Kongsted, H. C. (2011). Unraveling the role of public researcher mobility for industrial innovation. IZA discussion paper no. 5691. Bonn: Institute of the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix- University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
  18. Fritsch, M., & Krabel, S. (2012). Ready to leave the ivory tower?: Academic scientists’ appeal to work in private sector. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(3), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garavelli, A. C., Gorgoglione, M., & Scozzi, B. (2002). Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies. Technovation, 22(5), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrera, L., Muñoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2010). Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm’s innovation process. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 510–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoisl, K. (2007). Tracing mobile inventors-the causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Research Policy, 35(5), 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hommen, L., & Doloreux, D. (2003). Is the regional innovation system concept at the end of its life cycle? Paper presented for the conference: Innovation in Europe: Dynamics, institutions and values, 8th–9th May, Denmark.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Internal vs. external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management, 30(3), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, J., & Marschke, G. (2005). Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(2), 298–317.Google Scholar
  26. King, Z., Burke, S., & Pemberton, J. (2005). The “bounded” career: An empirical study of human capital, career mobility and employment outcomes in a mediated labour market. Human Relations, 58(8), 981–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kluger, A. N. (1998). Commute variability and strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenzi, C. (2009). Patterns and determinants of skilled workers’ mobility: Evidence from a survey of Italian inventors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from a linked employer-employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1161–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education (2006). Ammattikorkeakoulut 2005, taulukoita AMKOTA-tietokannasta. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja, 42 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  32. Ministry of Education and Culture (2010). Tohtoritarve 2020-luvulla. Ennakointia tohtorien työmarkkinoiden ja tutkintotarpeiden pitkän aikavälin kehityksestä. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja, 13 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  33. Møen, J. (2007). R&D spillovers from subsidized firms that fail: tracking knowledge by following employees across firms. Research Policy, 36(9), 1443–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munasinghe, L., & Sigman, K. (2004). A hobo syndrome? Mobility, wages, and job turnover. Labour Economics, 11(2), 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF) (2009). Human resources of science and technology [e-publication]. Appendix figure 1. Doctorate and licentiate degrees in 1993–2009. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. https://tilastokeskus.fi/til/tthv/2009/tthv_2009_2011-03-24_kuv_001_en.html [referred: 4.4.2017].
  38. Pietilä, M. (2015). Tenure track career system as a strategic instrument for academic leaders. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Power, D., & Lundmark, M. (2004). Working through knowledge pools: Labour market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters. Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 1025–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shauman, K., & Xie, Y. (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography, 33(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sjaastadt, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stern, S. (2004). Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science, 50(6), 835–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2004). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. IZA discussion paper no. 1278. Forschunngsinstitut zur zukunft der arbeit institute for the study of labor.Google Scholar
  46. Takeshima, H., Shrestha, R. B., Kaphle, B. D., Karkee, M., Pokhrel, S. & Kumar, A. (2016). Effects of agricultural mechanization on smallholders and their self-selection into farming: An insight from the Nepal Terai (Vol. 1583). International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Tohtoreiden työllistyminen, & sijoittuminen ja tarve (2003). Suomen Akatemian julkaisuja 4/03. http://www.aka.fi/globalassets/awanhat/documents/tiedostot/julkaisut/4_03-tohtoritarve.pdf.
  48. Zellner, C. (2003). The economic effects of basic research: evidence for embodied knowledge transfer via scientists’ migration. Research Policy, 32(10), 1881–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.Google Scholar
  50. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Torero, M. (2002). Labor mobility from academe to commerce. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 629–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations