Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Citations to chemical resources in scholarly articles: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics and The Merck Index

  • 2866 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

The use of authoritative chemical resources by scientists is an important first step to finding reliable and credible information for supporting and validating research results. Given the vast number of commercially and freely available online resources used for searching chemical and physical information, the utility of the traditional ready-reference print resources such as the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (referred to as the “Rubber Bible”) and The Merck Index (referred to as the “Chemist’s Bible”) may no longer be regarded suitable or useful for looking-up information and hence no longer required for purchase by academic institutions. To investigate this hypothesis, a study was undertaken to examine the usage and impact of these resources through citation in scholarly articles. The ‘Cited Reference Search’ from the Web of Science database is used to search, collect, and analyze article citations from the Science Citation Index Expanded to the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics and The Merck Index, between the years 2002 and 2015 inclusive. The distribution of article citations to these chemical resources was analyzed by document type, research field, country, affiliation, and journal. The article citation yearly counts to these chemical resources were further compared to Wikipedia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tomaszewski, R. Unpublished results.

References

  1. Álvarez, E. C., & Anegón, F. D. (2009). Chemistry in Spain bibliometric analysis through Scopus. Chimica Oggi, 27(6), 61–64.

  2. Annibaldi, A., Truzzi, C., Illuminati, S., & Scarponi, G. (2010). Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 398(1), 17–26. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4286-3.

  3. Arkhipov, D. B., & Berezkin, V. G. (2002). Development of analytical chemistry in the latter half of the 20th century (scientometric analysis). Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 57(7), 581–585. doi:10.1023/a:1016217715420.

  4. Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0764-z.

  5. Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., & Courtial, J. P. (2005). Analysis of the field of physical chemistry of surfactants with the Unified Scienctometric Model. Fit of relational and activity indicators. Scientometrics, 63(2), 259–276. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0212-4.

  6. Balaban, A. T., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Is chemistry ‘The Central Science’? How are different sciences related? Co-citations, reductionism, emergence, and posets. Scientometrics, 69(3), 615–637. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0173-2.

  7. Barth, A., & Marx, W. (2012). Stimulation of ideas through compound-based bibliometrics: Counting and mapping chemical compounds for analyzing research topics in chemistry, physics, and materials science. ChemistryOpen, 1(6), 276–283. doi:10.1002/open.201200029.

  8. Berezkin, V. G., Sidorenko, N. A., & Arkhipov, D. B. (2007). How we are cited: Russian analytical chemistry in the mirror of the science citation index (1991–2004). Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 62(1), 90–99. doi:10.1134/s1061934807010182.

  9. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Marx, W. (2007). Citation environment of angewandte chemie. Chimia, 61(3), 104–109. doi:10.2533/chimia.2007.104.

  10. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry. Scientometrics, 89(3), 835–843. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0472-0.

  11. Bouznik, V. M., & Zibareva, I. V. (2015). Fluorine chemistry in Russia: Bibliometrical and subject analysis. Fluorine Notes, 3(100), 1–2. doi:10.17677/fn20714807.2015.03.04.

  12. Boyack, K. W., Börner, K., & Klavans, R. (2009). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45–60. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5.

  13. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Grupp, H. (1995). The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part I. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 33(3), 263–293. doi:10.1007/BF02017332.

  14. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1987). One more version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact in the life sciences and chemistry 1978–1980. Scientometrics, 11(3–4), 127–140. doi:10.1007/BF02016587.

  15. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact in the life sciences and chemistry 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 14(1–2), 3–15. doi:10.1007/BF02020240.

  16. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989a). Charting national research performances in analytical-chemistry, 1981–1985. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 8(8), 281–284. doi:10.1016/0165-9936(89)85058-7.

  17. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989b). National research efforts in analytical-chemistry, 1981–1985. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 8(9), 316–318. doi:10.1016/0165-9936(89)87033-5.

  18. Braun, T., & Schubert, A. (2010). Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 2005–2009: A citation-based bibliography and impact analysis using Hirsch-type statistics. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 285(1), 1–168. doi:10.1007/s10967-010-0571-z.

  19. Braun, T., Szabadi-Peresztegi, Z., & Kovács-Németh, É. (2003). No-bells for ambiguous lists of ranked Nobelists as science indicators of national merit in physics, chemistry and medicine, 1901–2001. Scientometrics, 56(1), 3–28. doi:10.1023/A:1021998006078.

  20. Brazzeal, B. (2011). Citations to Wikipedia in chemistry journals: A preliminary study. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. doi:10.5062/F4057CV7.

  21. Brown, C. (2007). The role of Web-based information in the scholarly communication of chemists: Citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2055–2065. doi:10.1002/asi.20666.

  22. Buchanan, R. A. (2006). Accuracy of cited references: The role of citation databases. College & Research Libraries, 67(4), 292–303. doi:10.5860/crl.67.4.292.

  23. Buntrock, R. E. (2016). Using citation indexes, citation searching, and bibliometrics to improve chemistry scholarship, research, and administration. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3), 560–566. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00451.

  24. Buznik, V. M., & Zibareva, I. V. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on fluoropolymers. Polymer Science Series A, 53(11), 1110–1120. doi:10.1134/s0965545x11110022.

  25. Buznik, V. M., Zibareva, I. V., Piottukh-Peletskii, V. N., & Sorokin, N. I. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Structural Chemistry. Journal of Structural Chemistry, 45(6), 1096–1106. doi:10.1007/s10947-005-0100-z.

  26. Ciriminna, R., & Pagliaro, M. (2013). On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research. Chemistry Central Journal. doi:10.1186/1752-153x-7-132.

  27. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. doi:10.1002/asi.21525.

  28. Currano, J. N., & Roth, D. L. (Eds.). (2014). Chemical information for chemists: A primer. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.

  29. Dewitt, T., Nicholson, R., & Wilson, M. (1980). Science citation index and chemistry. Scientometrics, 2(4), 265–275. doi:10.1007/BF02016348.

  30. Dou, H., Quoniam, L., & Hassanaly, P. (1991). The scientific dynamics of a city: A study of chemistry in Marseilles from 1981 to the present. Scientometrics, 22(1), 83–93. doi:10.1007/bf02019276.

  31. Dwivedi, S., Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2015). Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004–2013. Current Science, 109(5), 869–877. doi:10.18520/v109/i5/869-877.

  32. Gingras, Y., & Wallace, M. L. (2010). Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: A bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007). Scientometrics, 82(2), 401–412. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0035-9.

  33. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214. doi:10.1023/a:1010561321723.

  34. Grandjean, P., Eriksen, M. L., Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2011). The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: A bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles. Environmental Health. doi:10.1186/1476-069x-10-96.

  35. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385–389.

  36. Guay, Y. (1986). Emergence of basic research on the periphery: Organic chemistry in India, 1907–1926. Scientometrics, 10(1–2), 77–94. doi:10.1007/BF02016862.

  37. Harirchi, G., Melin, G., & Etemad, S. (2007). An exploratory study of the feature of Iranian co-authorships in biology, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 72(1), 11–24. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1693-0.

  38. Harzing, A. W. K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73. doi:10.3354/esep00076.

  39. Hawkins, D. T. (1980). Crystallographic literature: A bibliometric and citation analysis. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography, 36(3), 475–482. doi:10.1107/S056773948000099X.

  40. Haynes, W. M. (Ed.). (2016). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  41. Herbstein, F. H. (1993). Measuring publications output and publications impact of faculty members of a university chemistry department. Scientometrics, 28(3), 349–373. doi:10.1007/bf02026515.

  42. Hernández-García, Y. I., Chamizo, J. A., Kleiche-Dray, M., & Russell, J. M. (2015). The scientific impact of Mexican steroid research 1935–1965: A bibliometric and historiographic analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1245–1256. doi:10.1002/asi.23493.

  43. Jacsó, P. (2004). Citation searching. Online Information Review, 28(6), 454–460. doi:10.1108/14684520410570580.

  44. Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Sagar, A., & Kumar, A. (2006). World literature on thorium research: A scientometric study based on Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69(2), 347–364. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0157-2.

  45. Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Mohan, L., Gaderao, C. R., et al. (2005). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the chemistry division at Bhabha atomic research centre. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 10(1), 65–89.

  46. Karki, M. M. S., & Garg, K. C. (1997). Bibliometrics of alkaloid chemistry research in India. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 37(2), 157–161. doi:10.1021/ci960032z.

  47. Karki, M. M. S., & Garg, K. C. (1999). Scientometrics of Indian organic chemistry research. Scientometrics, 45(1), 107–116. doi:10.1007/bf02458471.

  48. Karki, M. M. S., Garg, K. C., & Sharma, P. (2000). Activity and growth of organic chemistry research in India during 1971–1989. Scientometrics, 49(2), 279–288. doi:10.1023/a:1010521203335.

  49. Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013). The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3), 535–553. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1011-y.

  50. Kim, M. J., & Kim, B. J. (2000). A bibliometric analysis of publications by the chemistry department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992–1998. Journal of Information Science, 26(2), 111–119. doi:10.1177/016555150002600204.

  51. Kumari, G. L. (2006). Trends in synthetic organic chemistry research. Cross-country comparison of Activity Index. Scientometrics, 67(3), 467–476. doi:10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.8.

  52. Kumari, G. L. (2009). Synthetic organic chemistry research: Analysis by scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 80(3), 559–570. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1985-4.

  53. Lafferty, M. (2009). A framework for evaluating science and technology electronic reference books: A comparison of five platforms in chemistry. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/09-fall/refereed1.html?a_aid=3598aabf

  54. Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010). Citation analysis: Comparison of web of science, scopus, SciFinder, and google scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(3), 196–217. doi:10.1080/15424065.2010.505518.

  55. Li, J., & Willett, P. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of Chinese research on cyclization, MALDI-TOF, and antibiotics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50(1), 22–29. doi:10.1021/ci9003199.

  56. Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Zhong, Z. (2013). Non-english journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations? Scientometrics, 95(1), 333–350. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0.

  57. Lyon, W. (1990). Current status of neutron activation analysis and aplied nuclear chemistry. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 140(1), 205–214. doi:10.1007/BF02037378.

  58. Maczelka, H., & Zsindely, S. (1992). All well if starts well? Citation infancy of recently launched chemistry journals. Scientometrics, 25(2), 367–372. doi:10.1007/bf02028092.

  59. Malo, S., & Geuna, A. (2000). Science-technology linkages in an emerging research platform: The case of combinatorial chemistry and biology. Scientometrics, 47(2), 303–321. doi:10.1023/A:1005643127551.

  60. Marx, W. (2001). Angewandte chemie in light of the science citation index. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 40(1), 139–143.

  61. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–222. doi:10.1023/A:1010529114941.

  62. Nagpaul, P. S., & Pant, N. (1993). Cross-national assessment of specialization patterns in chemistry. Scientometrics, 27(2), 215–235. doi:10.1007/BF02016551.

  63. Nederhof, A., & Van Raan, A. (1989). A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry. Scientometrics, 17(5–6), 427–435. doi:10.1007/BF02017463.

  64. Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of chemical abstracts. Scientometrics, 78(2), 219–229. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2007-2.

  65. O’Neil, M. J. (Ed.). (2013). The Merck index: An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.

  66. Osareh, F., & McCain, K. W. (2008). The structure of Iranian chemistry research, 1990–2006: An author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2146–2155. doi:10.1002/asi.20923.

  67. Pinski, G. (1977). Influence and interrelationship of chemical journals. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 17(2), 67–74. doi:10.1021/ci60010a003.

  68. Quoniam, L., Dou, H., Hassanaly, P., & Mille, G. (1991). Bibliometrics and chemistry: An example on fatty-acids and phospholipides. Analusis, 19(1), I48–I52.

  69. Qurashi, M. M. (1991). Publication-rate and size of two prolific research groups in departments of inorganic-chemistry at Dacca University (1944–1965) and zoology at Karachi University (1966–84). Scientometrics, 20(1), 79–92. doi:10.1007/bf02018146.

  70. Rabkin, Y., & Lafitte-Houssat, J. (1979). Cooperative research in petroleum chemistry. Scientometrics, 1(4), 327–338. doi:10.1007/BF02019304.

  71. Ridley, D. D. (2001). Citation searches in on-line databases: Possibilities and pitfalls. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 20(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/s0167-2940(01)90065-2.

  72. Rivera, G., Puras, G., Palos, I., Ordaz-Pichardo, C., & Bocanegra-Garcia, V. (2010). Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in the field of medicinal chemistry in Latin America, the People’s Republic of China, and India. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 19(6), 603–616. doi:10.1007/s00044-009-9216-6.

  73. Russell, J. M., Hernández-García, Y., & Kleiche-Dray, M. (2016). Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns. Scientometrics, 109(1), 283–316. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2069-0.

  74. Schubert, A. (1996). The portrait of a journal as reflected in its publications, references and citations: Inorganica Chimica Acta, 1990–1994. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 253(2), 111–118. doi:10.1016/S0020-1693(96)05360-1.

  75. Schummer, J. (1997a). Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800–1995. Scientometrics, 39(1), 107–123. doi:10.1007/bf02457433.

  76. Schummer, J. (1997b). Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances. Scientometrics, 39(1), 125–140. doi:10.1007/bf02457434.

  77. Singh, U., & Arunachalam, S. (1991). Publication and citation patterns in the literature of liquid crystals with special reference to the contribution of India, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom and the Soviet Union. Scientometrics, 20(1), 197–220. doi:10.1007/BF02018155.

  78. Spagnolo, F. (1990). Brazilian scientists’ publications and mainstream science: Some policy implications: The case of chemical and electrical engineering. Scientometrics, 18(3–4), 205–218. doi:10.1007/BF02017762.

  79. Takeda, Y., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2007). Citation network of CVD research: Research topics and journals. Chemical Vapor Deposition, 13(10), 523–525. doi:10.1002/cvde.200700011.

  80. Téllez, H., & Vadillo, J. M. (2010). Bibliometric study of journal publications on analytical chemistry 2000–2007: Publication productivity and journal preferences by country. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 397(4), 1477–1484. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3732-6.

  81. Testa, J. (2016). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/.

  82. Tomaszewski, R., & MacDonald, K. I. (2016). A study of citations to Wikipedia in scholarly publications. Science & Technology Libraries, 35(3), 246–261. doi:10.1080/0194262x.2016.1206052.

  83. Tsay, M. Y. (1989). Bibliometric study of the application of computers in synthetic organic, physical, inorganic, and analytical chemistry literature abstracted by chemical abstracts in 1986. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 29(3), 156–158. doi:10.1021/ci00063a004.

  84. van Raan, A. F. (2006a). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0066-4.

  85. van Raan, A. F. J. (2006b). Performance-related differences of bibliometric statistical properties of research groups: Cumulative advantages and hierarchically layered networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(14), 1919–1935. doi:10.1002/asi.20389.

  86. Ventura, O. N., & Mombrú, A. W. (2006). Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. A comparison of publication and citation profiles of full and associate professors at a school of chemistry in Uruguay. Scientometrics, 69(2), 287–313. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0154-5.

  87. Vinkler, P. (1999). Ratio of short term and long term impact factors and similarities of chemistry journals represented by references. Scientometrics, 46(3), 621–633. doi:10.1007/BF02459616.

  88. Waaijer, C. J., & Palmblad, M. (2015). Bibliometric mapping: Eight decades of analytical chemistry, with special focus on the use of mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 87(9), 4588–4596. doi:10.1021/ac5040314.

  89. Wan, T. J., Shen, S. M., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Shu, C. M. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of carbon dioxide reduction research trends during 1999–2009. Separation and Purification Technology, 94, 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.022.

  90. Whitley, K. M. (2002). Analysis of SciFinder scholar and web of science citation searches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1210–1215. doi:10.1002/asi.10192.

  91. Yalpani, M., Heydari, A., & Mehrdad, M. (2005). Application of scientometric methods to chemical research in Iran: Reflections on Iran’s current science policy. Scientometrics, 63(3), 531–547. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0226-y.

  92. Ye, L., Lewis, S. E., Raker, J. R., & Oueini, R. (2015). Examining the impact of chemistry education research articles from 2007 through 2013 by citation counts. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1299–1305. doi:10.1021/ed5007635.

  93. Yitzhaki, M., & Ben-Tamar, D. (1991). Number of references in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the journal of biological chemistry throughout 1910–1985. Scientometrics, 21(1), 3–22. doi:10.1007/BF02019179.

  94. Zhang, B. G., Liu, Y., Huang, W. L., Li, J. X., Feng, C. P., & Hu, W. W. (2015). Mapping of hexavalent chromium removal research: A bibliometric analysis of research outputs from 1975 to 2012. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24(12C), 4834–4841.

  95. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Chemistry in China—A bibliometric view. Chimica Oggi, 27(6), 19–22.

  96. Zibareva, I. V., & Parmon, V. N. (2013). Identification of “hot spots” of the science of catalysis: Bibliometric and thematic analysis of nowaday reviews and monographs. Russian Chemical Bulletin, 62(10), 2266–2278. doi:10.1007/s11172-013-0329-1.

  97. Zibareva, I. V., Vedyagin, A. A., & Bukhtiyarov, V. I. (2014). Nanocatalysis: A bibliometric analysis. Kinetics and Catalysis, 55(1), 1–11. doi:10.1134/S0023158414010194.

  98. Zibareva, I. V., Vedyagin, A. A., & Bukhtiyarov, V. I. (2016). Kinetika i Kataliz: 55 years in the bibliometric dimension. Kinetics and Catalysis, 57(1), 1–16. doi:10.1134/S0023158416010146.

  99. Zsindely, S., Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1982). Citation patterns of editorial gatekeepers in international chemistry journals. Scientometrics, 4(1), 69–76. doi:10.1007/BF02098007.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Robert Tomaszewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomaszewski, R. Citations to chemical resources in scholarly articles: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics and The Merck Index . Scientometrics 112, 1865–1879 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2437-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Authoritative
  • Chemistry
  • Citation counts
  • Handbooks
  • Journal articles
  • Scholarly publications