Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Erratum to: How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy

  • 2698 Accesses

Erratum to: Scientometrics DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x

In the original publication of the article, in Results section, two data in the paragraph starting from “Given that the competitions for…” have been published incorrectly: 90 (11%) should read as 54 (7%) and 60 (12%) should read as 25 (4%).

The correct version of the two sentences involved is provided below.

In fact, we find that 39 (24%) of the 165 three-period TS Assistant Professors were never promoted, while 54 (7%) three-period UN Assistant Professors were advanced to Associate Professor. Similarly, 121 (41%) of the three-period TS Associate Professors were never promoted, while 25 (4%) of three-period UN Associate Professors did advance to full professorship.

Author information

Correspondence to Giovanni Abramo.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. & Soldatenkova, A. Erratum to: How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy. Scientometrics 113, 1825 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2255-8

Download citation