, Volume 110, Issue 3, pp 1437–1452 | Cite as

Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy

  • Jianhua Hou


In this study, we investigated the evolution process and historical roots of citation analysis study by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS), which is an advanced research method recently introduced in the field of Scientometrics. Through analyzing the publication year and citation frequency of cited references in a knowledge domain, RPYS can identify the citation peak of such cited references. We collected 2543 articles including 56,392 references regarding citation analysis in SCI-E and SSCI databases between 1970 and July 2016 as our data source. Based on the RPYS method by the CRExplorer program, the results showed that the peak citation publication years by chronological order occurred in 1955, 1963, 1973, 1979, 1981, 1990, 2005 and 2008 in the field of citation analysis study. According to the overall distribution of peak citation publication years, the RPYS for citation analysis was divided into five time periods for the convenience of comparison in this paper: that is, before 1900, 1901–1950, 1951–1970, 1971–2000, and 2001–2016. Pre 1950, especially during the 1900s–1950s, before the citation analysis method was introduced, there were three rather high peak citation publication years, Lotka’s law and Bradford’s law laid the knowledge foundation for citation analysis. 1950s–1970s was the forming period of citation analysis, among the three citation peaks in this period, Garfield (Science 122(3159):1127–1128, 1955), Price (Von Der Studierstube Zur 7(3–6):443–458, 1963, Science 149:510–515, 1965), and Kessler (1963) established an important knowledge base for the formation of citation analysis study. 1971–2000 was a developing period of citation analysis. Document Co-citation Analysis and Author Co-citation Analysis methods laid the foundation of the development of citation analysis study. Since 2000, citation analysis study has been expanding rapidly. By the number of published papers and number of cited references with highly cited frequency, Garfield E., White H.D., Small H., MacRoberts M.H., Price D.D. have played an important role in promoting the evolution of citation analysis study.


Referenced publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) Citation analysis Citation peak Historical root CRExplorer 



This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71103022.


  1. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth, A., Marx, W., Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2014). On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective. European Physical Journal Plus, 129(6), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgman, C. L., Gallagher, A. L., & Krieger, D. (1990). Childrens use of an interactive catalog of science materials. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meetings, 27, 55–68.Google Scholar
  4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.Google Scholar
  8. Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.Google Scholar
  9. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A stastistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress, 11(44), 578–596.Google Scholar
  13. Comins, J. A., & Hussey, T. W. (2015a). Compressing multiple scales of impact detection by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comins, J. A., & Hussey, T. W. (2015b). Detecting seminal research contributions to the development and use of the global positioning system by reference publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics, 104(2), 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comins, J.A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). Identification of long-term concept-symbols among citations: Can documents be clustered in terms of common intellectual histories?
  16. Cronin, B., Snyder, H. W., & Rosenbaum, H. (1998). Invoked on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1319–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 1127–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Garfield, E. (2006). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1123–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicors: A survey . Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  23. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 386–389.Google Scholar
  24. Hagstrom, W. O., & Selvin H. C. (1965). 2 Dimensions of cohesiveness in small-groups. Socimetry, 28(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Biblographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation—comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Milojević, S. (2014). Referenced publication years spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lipetz, B. A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science litebature through inclusion of citation relationship indicatiors. American Documentation, 16(2), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.Google Scholar
  34. Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(40), 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (2009). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marx, W., & Bornmann, L. (2014). Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): The legend of the Darwin finches. Scientometrics, 99, 839–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mccain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merton, R. K. (1965). Nurse-physician collaboration toward improved patient care. Observations. Papers. National Conference for Professional Nurses and Physicians, 2, 51–52.Google Scholar
  40. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Information Science and Knowledge Management, 57(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
  41. Popper, K. R. (1961). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. Von Der Studierstube Zur, 7(3–6), 443–458.Google Scholar
  43. Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17268–17272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4(2), 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 24(24), 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.Google Scholar
  48. Thor, A., Marx, W., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Introducing cited references explorer: A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references disambiguation. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, H. D., & Mccain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.Google Scholar
  51. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center of Science Technology and SocietyDalian UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations