Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis
- 2.1k Downloads
Sustainable development (SD) was posited almost three decades ago by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) as an integrated approach for addressing concerns regarding a number of environmental and socio-economic issues. To represent the knowledge structure and evolution of SD in the post-WCED era, this paper resorted to CiteSpace to identify and visualize cited references and keyword networks, the distribution of categories and countries, and highly cited references relating to SD research. Two indicators embedded in CiteSpace were introduced to investigate intellectual turning points and pivotal points to outline the emerging trends, and furthermore, a new indicator (BC × CB) was developed and applied for keyword analysis. Our findings were as follows. First, the United States and UK occupy dominant positions in relation to SD studies in general and meanwhile China records the highest publication counts. Second, the concept of nature capital has contributed significantly to interpretations of SD and the detected promising disciplinary frontiers are materials category and social sciences. Lastly, keyword analysis shows the valuable keywords under the measure of BC × CB and furthermore citation maps and visible hot research areas are revealed as well.
KeywordsSustainable development CiteSpace Knowledge structures Bibliometrics
The authors sincerely treasured the comments and suggestions from reviewers. This work was supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (15ZDC031).
- Buter, R. K., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2013). Identification and analysis of the highly cited knowledge base of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 253–267.Google Scholar
- Chen, C. (2005). The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (pp. 98–105).Google Scholar
- He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133.Google Scholar
- Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment (Washington DC), 47(3), 8–21.Google Scholar
- Knowles, B., Blair, L., Hazas, M., & Walker, S. (2013, September). Exploring sustainability research in computing: where we are and where we go next. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 305–314). ACM.Google Scholar
- Korten, D. C. (2015). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.2896.
- Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 145–158.Google Scholar
- Monbiot, G. (2013). Captive state: The corporate takeover of Britain. Hants: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Pearce, D. W., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Revkin, A. C. (2002, August 20). Forget nature. Even Eden is engineered. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/20/science/earth/20MANA.html. Accessed 26 May 2016.
- Solomon, S. (Ed.). (2007). Climate change 2007—the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
- Woods, D. (2002). Sustainable development: A contested paradigm. Birmingham. Cologny, UK: Economics Forum of the Foundation for Water Research.Google Scholar
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar