Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 1455–1476 | Cite as

Bibliometric study of Electronic Commerce Research in Information Systems & MIS Journals

  • Arthur Jing Lin
  • Chien-Lung Hsu
  • Chun-Hao Chiang
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the contributions of the Information Systems & MIS articles in the electronic commerce literature. To achieve this, the papers published in the ten top journals are reviewed. This bibliometric study examines the extant literature on Information Systems & MIS and international business. We examine a sample of 853 articles published in ten leading management/business journals during the 23 year period from 1991 to 2014. The results provide a global perspective of the field, identifying the works that have had the greatest impact, the intellectual interconnections among authors and published papers, and the main research traditions or themes that have been explored in Information Systems & MIS studies. Structural and longitudinal analyses reveal changes in the intellectual structure of the field over time. The paper concludes with a discussion of the accumulated knowledge and suggestions for avenues of future research.

Keywords

Bibliometrics analysis Information Systems & MIS Citations 

References

  1. Andre, C. D., Pinto, A. L., Matias, M., Dutra, M. L., & Gonzales-Aguilar, A. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of the scientific journal Transinformacao. Professional De La Information, 23(4), 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari, A., & Mela, C. F. (2003). E-customization. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Byers, J. W., Mitzenmacher, M., & Zervas, G. (2012). The groupon effect on yelp ratings: A root cause analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on electronic commerce (pp. 248–265), ACM.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, D. N., Jeng, B., Lee, W. P., & Chuang, C. H. (2008). An agent-based model for consumer-to-business electronic commerce. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C. M., & Kuljis, J. (2009). The rising landscape: A visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chircu, A. M., Davis, G. B., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Trust, expertise and ecommerce intermediary adoption. In J. DeGross (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth Americas conference on information systems (pp. 710–716). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, J., & Horn, M. (2012). The relationship between perceived quality and divulgation strategies of products in the electronic marketplace. Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41(1), 5778–5780.Google Scholar
  10. Cruz, S. C., & Teixeira, A. A. (2010). The evolution of the cluster literature: Shedding light on the regional studies–regional science debate. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1263–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimoka, A., Banker, R. D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F. D., et al. (1989). On the use of neurophysiological tools in is research: Developing a research agenda for Neurois. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 679–702.Google Scholar
  12. Economist. (2015). Electronic Commerce in China: The Alibaba phenomenon. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21573981-chinas-e-commerce-giant-could-generate-enormous-wealthprovided-countrys-rulers-leave-it.htm. Accessed October 15, 2015.
  13. E-Stats. (2014). U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/econ/estats/2012_e-stats_report.pdf. Accessed December 25, 2015.
  14. Etemad, H. (2004). E-commerce: The emergence of a field and its knowledge network. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(7), 776–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Featherman, M., & Pavlou, P. (2002). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. In J. DeGross (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighth Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1034–1046). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Gefen, D. (1997).Building users’ trust in freeware providers and the effects of this trust on users’ perceptions of usefulness, ease of use and intended use of freeware. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  17. Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Castello-Cogollos, L., Navarro-Molina, C., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Valderrarna-Zurian, J. C. (2008). Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in LISA. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsu, C. L., Westland, J. C., & Chiang, C. H. (2015). Editorial: Electronic Commerce Research in seven map. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalakota, K., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Electronic commerce: A manager’s guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ngai, E. W. T., & Wat, F. K. T. (2002). A literature review and classification of electronic commerce research. Information & Management, 39(5), 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 236–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinto, M., Isabel Escalona, M., & Pulgarin, A. (2015). The scientific production of Ibero-American authors on information literacy (1985–2013). Scientometric, 102(2), 1555–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pritchard, A. (1996). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.Google Scholar
  27. Qian, G. (2014). Scientometric sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(7), 1462–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rorissa, A., & Yuan, X. J. (2012). Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 48(1), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(1), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaffer, G., & Zhang, Z. J. (1995). Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Science, 14(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Small, H., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2015). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 1450–1467.Google Scholar
  32. Stewart, D. W., Pavlou, P. A., & Ward, S. (2002). Media influences on marketing communications. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 353–396). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Tsai, H. H. (2015). The research trends forecasted by bibliometric methodology: A case study in e-commerce from 1996 to July 2015. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turban, E., Lee, J., King, D., & Chung, H. M. (2000). Electronic commerce: A managerial perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). Assessment of research performance with bibliometric methods. In Informationsund Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften, Netherland, Springer (pp. 499–524).Google Scholar
  36. Zhou, L., Zhang, P., & Zimmermann, Hans-Dieter. (2013). Social commerce research: An integrated view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(1), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 3–111.Google Scholar
  38. Zwass, V. (1998). Structure and macro-level impacts of electronic commerce: From technological infrastructure to electronic marketplaces. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Emerging information technologies (pp. 289–315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Jing Lin
    • 1
  • Chien-Lung Hsu
    • 2
  • Chun-Hao Chiang
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of International BusinessNational Taipei UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Marketing ManagementTakming University of Science and TechnologyTaipei CityTaiwan ROC
  3. 3.Department of Risk Control ManagementMega Financial Holding CompanyTaipei 100Taiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations