Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics
- 538 Downloads
This study aimed to assess the mediating role of save, discussion, and recommendation measures in the relationship between visibility and citation in biomedical articles in 2009–2013. Path analysis method was used to assess the causal relationships between the variables in this descriptive correlational study. Systematic and random stratified methods were employed for sampling. The sample size was determined to be 1892 articles using the Cochrane formula and data were gathered by using the PLOS altmetrics. The study’s model fit indices showed that visibility influences citation both directly and indirectly through the mediating role of save. Discussion had a significant, negative role in the relationship between visibility and citation, and recommendation did not have any significant mediating role in this relationship. Among the social networks presenting altmetrics, it seems that networks such as Mendeley which provide a basis for saving scientific articles have an important and significant effect on the amount of future citations through visibility metrics. This is while social networks discussing scientific findings have a negative effect on the future citation of articles through visibility metrics. This asserts that social networks based on save have an influential role as the basis of scientific interaction.
KeywordsPath analysis Visibility Citation Save Discussion Recommendation Mediation
- Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., & Mishne, G. (2008). Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 183–194).Google Scholar
- Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi, F., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. M. (2014). Visibility and citation impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120–125.Google Scholar
- Bar-Ilan, J. (2012). JASIST@ mendeley. In ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop.Google Scholar
- Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars visibility on the social web. In 17th international conference on science and technology indicators.Google Scholar
- Bazrafshan, A., Haghdoost, A., & Zare, M. (2014). A comparison of downloads, readership and citations data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas. Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from http://dx.doi.org.
- Bornmann, L. (2014). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Journal of Educational Sciences and Research. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8010.
- Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2014). Do altmetics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from http://arxiv.org.
- Ebrahimy, S. (2007). The cinsiderations and limitations in using Impact Factor. Faslnameh Ketab, 18(3), 141–157. (in Persian).Google Scholar
- Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Relationship between downloads and citation and the influence of language. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 1469–1484). Retrieved May 10, 2014 from http://ebrp.elsevier.com.
- Haustein, S., & Siebenlist, T. (2011). Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 446–457.Google Scholar
- Howard, J. (2012). Scholars seek better ways to track impact online. In The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved May 10, 2014 from http://chronicle.com.
- Huggett, S. (2012). F1000 journal rankings: An alternative way to evaluate the scientific impact of scholarly communications. Research Trends, 26, 7–11.Google Scholar
- Jabbary, N. (2013). Suitable model of sharing knowledge factors among faculty of Gorgan Universities. In Sixth conference of knowledge management. Published article in conference of knowledge management, International conference hall of ShahidBeheshti, Tehran. (in Persian).Google Scholar
- Mazarei, Z. (2013). Review of relationship between recognition of scientific products and marking them on Citeulike in the field of knowledge and information science during 2004 to 2012. Master’s thesis in Knowledge & Information Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. (in Persian).Google Scholar
- Nieder, C., Dalhaug, A., & Aandahl, G. (2013). Correlation between article download and citation figures for highly accessed articles from five open access oncology journals. Springer Plus, 2. Retrieved May 10, 2014 from www.springerplus.com.
- Parirokh, M., & Khatamiyanfar, P. (2007). Review of status and knowledge sharing platforms in the Libraries of AstanQodsRazavi with adaptation of NonakaandTakeuchi model. Library and Information Science, 10(4), 176–212. (in Persian).Google Scholar
- Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. (2012).Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. In ACM web science conference ACM web science conference. Retrieved May 10, 2014 from http://arxiv.org.
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
- Refoua, Sh, Tajdaran, M., & Rezaei, S. (2013). Review of infrastructure component to implement the sharing of knowledge in the insurance industry. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 47(3), 325–346. (in Persian).Google Scholar
- Schlögl, C., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Jack, K., & Krake, P. (2014a). Are downloads and readership data a substitute for citations? The case of a scholarly journal. In Libraries in the digital age (LIDA) proceedings (p. 13). Retrieved May 10, 2014, from http://ozk.unizd.hr/proceedings.
- Siamak, M. (2007). Open access journals: Problems and critics. Library and Information Science, 10(2), 188–209.Google Scholar
- Stojanovski, J. (2013). Visibility and (alt)metrics of the Croatian Open Access (OA) journals. Retrieved May 10, 2014, from http://www.researchgate.net.
- Tammaro, A. (2014). Altmetrics in the humanities: Perceptions of Italian scholars. In Libraries in the digital age. Retrieved December 5, 2014, from http://ozk.unizd.hr.
- Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189.Google Scholar
- Wardle, D. (2010). Do Faculty of 1000 (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 11–15.Google Scholar