, Volume 108, Issue 3, pp 1119–1128 | Cite as

Do scholars follow Betteridge’s Law? The use of questions in journal article titles

  • James M. CookEmail author
  • Dawn Plourde


In journalistic publication, Betteridge’s Law of Headlines stipulates that “Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.” When applied to the titles of academic publication, the assertion is referred to as Hinchcliffe’s Rule and denigrates the use of the question mark in titles as a “click-bait” marketing strategy. We examine the titles of all published articles in the year 2014 from five top-ranked and five mid-range journals in each of six academic fields (n = 7845). We describe the form of questions when they occur, and where a title poses a question that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” we note the article’s substantive answer. We do not find support for the criticism lodged by Betteridge’s Law and Hinchcliffe’s Rule. Although patterns vary by discipline, titles with questions are posed infrequently overall. Further, most titles with questions do not pose yes/no questions. Finally, the few questions that are posed in yes/no terms are actually more often answered with a “yes” than with a “no.” Concerns regarding click-bait questions in academic publications may, therefore, be unwarranted.


Articles Titles Questions Research papers Clickbait 

Mathematics Subject Classification


JEL Classification



  1. Ball, R. (2009). Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005. Scientometrics, 79(3), 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betteridge, I. (2009). TechCrunch: Irresponsible journalism. Accessed July 25, 2015.
  3. Blom, J. N., & Hansen, K. R. (2015). Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buter, R. K., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1043–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamby, S. (2015). On scientific writing in the information era: Tailoring papers for internet searching and other 21st century realities. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyland, K. (2002). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22(4), 529–557.Google Scholar
  10. Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krajnović, M. M., & Omrčen, D. (2013). Titles of articles in human movement science journals. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia, 57, 123–139.Google Scholar
  12. Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M. (2015). When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,. doi: 10.1002/asi.23369.Google Scholar
  13. Shieber, S. M. (2015). Is this article consistent with Hinchliffe’s Rule? Annals of Improbable Research, 21(3), 18–19.Google Scholar
  14. Sisó, M. J. (2009). Titles or headlines? Anticipating conclusions in biomedical research article titles as a persuasive journalistic strategy to attract busy readers. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 39, 29–54.Google Scholar
  15. Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Maine at AugustaAugustaUSA

Personalised recommendations