Since the publication of the first academic journal in 1665, the number of academic journal titles has grown steadily. In 2001, Mabe and Amin studied the pattern of growth in the number of academic journals worldwide, identifying three key development periods between 1900 and 1996. These three episodes are from 1900 to 1944, from 1944 to 1978, and from 1978 to 1996. The compound annual growth rates for each episode are 3.30, 4.68 and 3.31 % respectively. In this research, we seek to validate these findings, and extend on previous work to analyze journal growth patterns from 1986 to 2013. Our results show academic journals grew at an average rate of 4.7 % from 1986 to 2013, which is very similar to the growth rate during the Big Science period observed in the previous study. Our results also show that academic journals had an estimated 92 % Active rate, and 8 % Inactive rate annually. Out of all Active journals, approximately 43 % have high impact and reach JCR or SJR databases, and 26 % have relatively higher impact and are thus collected in the JCR database. The comparison results of Active/Inactive SJR and JCR journals suggest that lower impact journals have a higher chance to become Inactive than higher impact journals. With the wide use of the Internet in academic science, our results expectedly show that the number of Print-Only journals is gradually decreasing while the number of Online-Only journals is increasing. The growth of Online-Only journals exceeds the growth of Print-Only journals in 2007, and the number of Online-Only journals exceeded the number of Print and Only journals in 2012. More than 30 % Newly Created journals provide Open Access. It is suggested that we are experiencing the second journal boom in history and Internet technology has changed the academic publication system.
KeywordsJournal growth Journal development Academic science Academic journal Scholarly journal
Mathematics Subject Classification94A99
- Björk, B.-C. (2006). A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information research, 12(2), 17.Google Scholar
- Björk, B.-C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2008). Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options. Paper presented at the ELPUB2008.Google Scholar
- Blake, G., & Bly, R. W. (1993). The elements of technical writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Day, R., & Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- De Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, Big Science. Von der Studierstube bis zur.Google Scholar
- Elsevier. Scopus. From Elsevier: http://www.scopus.com/.
- Guerrero, R., & Piqueras, M. (2010). Open access. A turning point in scientific publication. International Microbiology, 7(3), 157–161.Google Scholar
- Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. arXiv preprint cs/0606079.Google Scholar
- Hames, I. (2008). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: Guidelines for good practice. New York City: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html.
- Hazelkorn, E. (2009). Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choices.Google Scholar
- Hazelkorn, E. (2013). How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Education? Paper presented at the IAU 13th General Conference. The Netherlands: Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Jacot, A. P. (1937). Principles of scientific publication. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 45(1), 127–129.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. Microsoft Excel (Version 2010).Google Scholar
- Peek, R. P., & Pomerantz, J. P. (1998). Electronic scholarly journal publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33, 321–356.Google Scholar
- Pringle, J. (2004). Do open access journals have impact. Nature Web Focus, 18.Google Scholar
- Relman, A. S. (1990). Peer review in scientific journals–what good is it? Western Journal of Medicine, 153(5), 520.Google Scholar
- Scopus. SCImago Journal & Country Rank—Journal Rankings. From http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php.
- Thomson Reuters. Web of Science. From Thomson Reuters: http://apps.webofknowledge.com/.