Work engagement in organizations: a social network analysis of the domain
- 836 Downloads
This study has used the social network analysis technique to effectively decompose the structure of the author, institution, country, and journal networks of the work engagement domain. Using articles from the Web of Science database, 1406 publications published in SCI, SCI-E, SSCI, and A&HCI outlets between 1990 and 2015 period were extracted and included in the analysis. Following an examination of this domain, we found that the network is relatively un-fragmented with a strong core that contains one large community of authors. This study also found evidence among the collaboration networks to suggest the power law distribution exists in the author and institutional networks in which the incoming nodes and links prefer to attach to the nodes that are already well connected. The study also sheds light on both the hidden network collaboration among authors, countries, and within the work engagement domain.
KeywordsWork engagement Hidden patterns Author networks Social network analysis
This research was supported by the Keimyung University research grant of 2016.
- Cole, M. S., Walter, F., Bedeian, A. G., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2012). Job burnout and employee engagement: A meta-analytic examination of construct proliferation. Journal of Management Science, 38(5), 1550–1581.Google Scholar
- Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In M. P. L. A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Henneberg, S., Jiang, Z., Naudé, P., & Ormrod, R. (2009). The network researchers’ network: A social network analysis of the IMP Group 1984–2006. The IMP Journal, 3(1), 28–49.Google Scholar
- Kim, W. (2014). Introduction. In W. J. Rothwell (Ed.), Creating engaged employees: It’s worth the investment. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.Google Scholar
- Krystallis, A., Ormond, R., & Christensen, K.V. (2011). Patterns and regularities in the European marketing academic community: A social network analysis of the EMAC annual conferences 2000–2010. In Paper presented at the European marketing academy: Conference Proceedings of the 2011 EMAC Conference. Ljubliana.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
- Mail, F., Kronegger, L., & Ferligo, A. (2010). Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian Sociological Community. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 1(2), 29–50.Google Scholar
- Marsden, P. V. (2008). Network data and measurement (Vol. 1). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sci2Team. (2009). Science of science (Sci2) tool Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. http://sci2.cns.iu.edu.
- Smith, M., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: a free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007–2010. http://nodexl.codeplex.com.
- Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.Google Scholar
- Xu, J., & Chau, M. (2006). The social identity of IS: Analyzing the collaboration network of the ICIS conferences (1980–2005). In Paper presented at the ICIS 2006. Milwaukee, WI, 10–13 Dec 2006.Google Scholar
- Xu, J., Chau, M., & Tan, B. (2014). The development of social capital in the collaboration network of information systems scholars. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(12), 835–859.Google Scholar