, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 355–388 | Cite as

Unveiling the intellectual origins of Social Media-based innovation: insights from a bibliometric approach

  • Francesco Paolo Appio
  • Antonella Martini
  • Silvia Massa
  • Stefania Testa


This article uses a bundle of bibliometric and text-mining techniques to provide a systematic assessment of the intellectual core of the Social Media-based innovation research field. The goal of this study is to identify main research areas, understand the current state of development and suggest potential future directions by analysing co-citations from 155 papers published between 2003 and 2013 in the most influential academic journals. The main clusters have been identified, mapped, and labelled. Their most active areas on this topic and the most influential and co-cited papers have been identified and described. Also, intra- and inter-cluster knowledge base diversity has been assessed by using indicators stemming from the domains of Information Theory and Biology. A t test has been performed to assess the significance of the inter-cluster diversity. Five co-existing research streams shaping the research field under investigation have been identified and characterized.


Social Media Innovation Bibliometric analysis Content analysis Diversity analysis 

Mathematics Subject Classification


JEL Classification

O32 M15 

Supplementary material

11192_2016_1955_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 34 kb)


  1. Acedo, F. J. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14(5), 619–639.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. E., & McCune, E. D. (1979). Application of the generalized jack-knife to Shannon’s measure of information used as an index of diversity. In J. F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith, & C. Taille (Eds.), Ecological diversity in theory and practice (pp. 117–131). Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, M., Kumaresh, T. V., & Mercer, G. A. (2001). The false promise of mass customization. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 62–71.Google Scholar
  4. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appio, F., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. (2002). Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: A contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  10. Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s ‘Innovation Jam’. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  11. Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., et al. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 54(3), 245–267.Google Scholar
  12. Bowman, K. O., Hutchenson, K., Odum, E. P., & Shenton, L. R. (1971). Comments on the distribution of indices of diversity. In G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou, & W. E. Waters (Eds.), Statistical ecology (pp. 315–359). London: Pennsylvanian State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.Google Scholar
  15. Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A. K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burke, R. R., Rangaswamy, A., & Gupta, S. (2001). Rethinking market research in the digital world. In J. Wind & V. Mahajan (Eds.), Digital marketing. Global strategies from the world’s leading experts (pp. 226–255). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, C., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing research streams: Two case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chesbrough, H. W. (2011). Open services innovation. Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooke, M., & Buckley, N. (2008). Web 2.0 Social networks and the future of market research. International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 267–292.Google Scholar
  23. Corrocher, N. (2011). The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corrocher, N., & Ordanini, A. (2002). Measuring the digital divide: A framework for the analysis of cross-country differences. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cortizo, J. C., Carrero, F. M., & Gómez, J. M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Mining Social Media. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(3), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J. I. (2010). How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 243–259.Google Scholar
  27. Cusumano, M. A., & Nobeoka, K. (1992). Strategy, structure and performance in product development: Observations from the auto industry. Research Policy, 21(3), 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dahan, E., & Hauser, J. R. (2002). The virtual customer. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(5), 332–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. David, R. J., & Han, S. K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davis, S. M. (1987). Future perfect. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  32. DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Di Gangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Di Gangi, P. M., Wasko, M., & Hooker, R. (2010). Getting customers’ ideas to work for you: Learning from Dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 213–228.Google Scholar
  35. Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management, 39(4), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Effing, R., & Spil, T. A. M. (2016). The social strategy cone: Towards a framework for evaluating social media strategies. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Franke, N., & Piller, F. T. (2003). Key research issues in user interaction with user toolkits in a mass customisation system. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(5), 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(6), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Franke, N., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy, 32(7), 1199–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Muhlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Füller, J., Matzler, K., & Hoppe, M. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6), 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gallagher, J., & Ranbotham, S. (2010). Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 197–212.Google Scholar
  48. Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2015). Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometrics and co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1167–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4(19), 476–483.Google Scholar
  50. Golder, P. N., Shacham, R., & Mitra, D. (2009). Innovations’ origins: When, by whom, and how are radical innovations developed? Marketing Science, 28(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gruner, K. E., & Homburg, C. (2000). Does customer interaction enhance new product success? Journal of Business Research, 49(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), 25–39.Google Scholar
  53. Harvey, C. E., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic journal quality guide, version 4. London: The Association of Business Schools.Google Scholar
  54. He, W., & Wang, F. K. (2015). A process-based framework of using social media to support innovation process. Information Technology and Management. doi: 10.1007/s10799-015-0236-2.
  55. Heltshe, J. F., & Bitz, D. W. (1979). Comparing diversity measures in sampled communities. In F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith, & C. Taille (Eds.), Ecological diversity in theory and practice (pp. 133–144). Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House.Google Scholar
  56. Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Hermann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5), 344–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  61. Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66.Google Scholar
  63. Hutcheson, K. (1970). A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29(1), 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jalonen, H. (2015). Dancing with the paradox—social media in innovation through complexity lens. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jeppesen, L. B. (2005). User toolkits for innovation: Consumers support each other. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(4), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J. (2003). Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Junge, K. (1994). Diversity of ideas about diversity measurement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Khan, G. F. (2013). Social media-based systems: An emerging area of information systems research and practice. Scientometrics, 95(1), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kohler, T., Matzler, K., & Fuller, J. (2009). Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation, 29(6–7), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76(1), 5–13.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in world transformed by social technologies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  79. Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & Von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lu, J. W. (2003). The evolving contributions in international strategic management research. Journal of International Management, 9(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Magurran, A. E., & McGill, B. J. (2011). Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Margalef, R. (1972). Homage to Evelyn Hutchinson, or why there is an upper limit to diversity. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 44, 211–235.Google Scholar
  83. Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2013). The firm, the platform and the customer: A ‘double mangle’ interpretation of social media for innovation. Information and Organization, 23(3), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2014). Customer co-creation projects and social media: The case of Barilla of Italy. Business Horizon, 57, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Maurer, B. A., & McGill, B. J. (2011). Measurement of species diversity. In A. E. Magurran & B. J. McGill (Eds.), Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment (pp. 55–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In M. L. Cody & J. M. Diamond (Eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities (pp. 81–120). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30(1), 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Morris, H., Harvey, C. E., & Kelly, A. (2009). Journal rankings and the ABS journal quality guide. Management Decision, 47(9), 1441–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413.Google Scholar
  92. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(6), 066133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ngai, E. W. T., Moon, K.-I. K., Lam, S. S., Chin, E. S. K., & Tao, S. S. C. (2015a). Social media models, technologies, and applications: an academic review and case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(5), 769–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ngai, E. W. T., Tao, S. S. C., & Moon, K.-I. K. (2015b). Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Noack, A. (2007). Energy models for graph clustering. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 11(2), 453–480.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Noack, A. (2009). Modularity clustering is force-directed layout. Physical Review E, 79(2), 026102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 65–72.Google Scholar
  99. Ooms, W., Bell, J., & Kok, R. A. W. (2015). Use of social media in inbound open innovation: Building capabilities for absorptive capacity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Papagiannidis, S., & Bourlakis, M. (2015). Special issue introduction—Social media: A revolution in communication. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Peet, R. K. (1974). The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pielou, E. C. (1969). An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  103. Pielou, E. C. (1975). Ecological diversity (pp. 19–31). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  104. Piller, F., Vossen, A., & Ihl, C. (2012). From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung, 65(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pisano, G. R., & Verganti, R. (2009). Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard BusinessReview, 86(12), 78–86.Google Scholar
  107. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  108. Raymond, E. S. (1999). The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, USA: O’Reilly & Associates.Google Scholar
  109. Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. (2000). Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovatino in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4), 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52(7), 1000–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  113. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Small, H. (2003). Research streams, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394–399.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Southwood, T. R. E., & Henderson, P. A. (2000). Ecological Methods. Hoboken: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  116. Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. SPRU Working Paper, no. 28.Google Scholar
  117. Thomke, S., & Von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
  118. Urban, G. L., & Von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54.Google Scholar
  122. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Noyons, E. C. M., & Buter, R. K. (2010). Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82(3), 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Vogel, R. (2012). The visible colleges of management and organization studies: A bibliometric analysis of academic journals. Organization Studies, 33(8), 1015–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Science, 44(5), 629–644.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Von Hippel, E. (2001). Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software (cover story). MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 82–86.Google Scholar
  130. Von Hippel E. (2002). Horizontal innovation networks by and for users. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  131. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  132. Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Von Hippel, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. European Physical Journal B, 86(11), 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
  137. White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of research streamatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.Google Scholar
  139. Zahl, S. (1977). Jack-knifing an index of diversity. Ecology, 58(4), 907–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Paolo Appio
    • 1
  • Antonella Martini
    • 2
  • Silvia Massa
    • 3
  • Stefania Testa
    • 3
  1. 1.Léonard de VinciPôle Universitaire, Research Center (Business Group)Paris La Défense CedexFrance
  2. 2.School of Engineering (DESTEC)University of PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.University of Genova (DIME)GenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations