, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 305–314 | Cite as

Iran’s scientific dominance and the emergence of South-East Asian countries as scientific collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region

  • Henk F. Moed


A longitudinal bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Thomson Reuters’ Incites and Elsevier’s Scopus, and published from Persian Gulf States and neighbouring Middle East countries, shows clear effects of major political events during the past 35 years. Predictions made in 2006 by the US diplomat Richard N. Haass on political changes in the Middle East have come true in the Gulf States’ national scientific research systems, to the extent that Iran has become in 2015 by far the leading country in the Persian Gulf, and South-East Asian countries including China, Malaysia and South Korea have become major scientific collaborators, displacing the USA and other large Western countries. But collaborations patterns among Persian Gulf States show no apparent relationship with differences in Islam denominations.


Scientific collaboration Bibliometrics Persian Gulf Region Iran International Co-authorship Political relations Thomson Reuters’ Incites Elsevier’s Scopus VOS viewer map 



The author wishes to thank Thomson Reuters for providing access to Incites, and the Sapienza University of Rome for offering its library facilities, especially access to Elsevier’s


  1. De Bruin, R. E., Braam, R. R., & Moed, H. F. (1991). Bibliometric lines in the sand. Nature, 349, 559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gringas, Y. (2014). How to boost your university up the rankings. University World News. (329), July 18, 2014.
  4. Gul, S., Nisa, N., Shah, T. A., Gupta, S., Jan, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Middle East: Research productivity and performance across nations. Scientometrics, 105, 1157–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haass, R. N. (2006). The New Middle East. Foreign Affairs.
  6. Islam. (n.d.). Information was obtained from a series of articles available at, X being the name of the country.
  7. Kotsemir, M., Kuznetsova, T., Nasybulina, E., & Pikalova, A. (2015). Identifying directions for the Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation. Foresight and STI Governance, 9, 54–72.Google Scholar
  8. Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2014). Tracking scientific development and collaborations: The case of 25 Asian countries. Research Trends, (38).Google Scholar
  9. Sharafedin, B. (2016). Iran’s leader says never trusted the West, seeks closer ties with China. Markets, January 23, 2016.
  10. UNESCO. (2014). Higher education in Asia: Expanding out, expanding up. ISBN 978-92-9189-147-4 licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO. Montreal: UIS.
  11. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wakefield, B., & Levenstein, L. (Eds.). (2011). China and the Persian Gulf: Implications for the United States. Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  13. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations