How does prolific professors influence on the citation impact of their university departments?
- 537 Downloads
Professors and associate professors (“professors”) in full-time positions are key personnel in the scientific activity of university departments, both in conducting their own research and in their roles as project leaders and mentors to younger researchers. Typically, this group of personnel also contributes significantly to the publication output of the departments, although there are also major contributions by other staff (e.g. PhD-students, postdocs, guest researchers, students and retired personnel). The scientific productivity is however, very skewed at the level of individuals, also for professors, where a small fraction of the professors, typically account for a large share of the publications. In this study, we investigate how the productivity profile of a department (i.e. the level of symmetrical/asymmetrical productivity among professors) influences on the citation impact of their departments. The main focus is on contributions made by the most productive professors. The findings imply that the impact of the most productive professors differs by scientific field and the degree of productivity skewness of their departments. Nevertheless, the overall impact of the most productive professors on their departments’ citation impact is modest.
KeywordsResearch productivity Productivity distribution Professors
- Aksnes, D. W. (2005). Citations and their use as indicators in science policy. Studies of validity and applicability issues with a particular focus on highly cited papers. Dissertation for the doctoral degree, University of Twente, Twente.Google Scholar
- Aksnes, D. W., & Mikki, S. (2014). Vitenskapelig publisering ved Universitetet i Bergen. Statistikk og indikatorer 2014 (Scientific publishing at the University of Bergen. Statistics and Indicators 2014). Bergen: Universitetsbiblioteket i Bergen.Google Scholar
- Alliance University. (2011). Funding research excellence: Research group size, critical mass and performance. London: University Alliance/Evidence.Google Scholar
- Costas, R., Bordons, M., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2009). Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 740–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doane, D. P., & Seward, L. E. (2011). Measuring skewness: A forgotten statistic? Journal of Statistics Education, 19, 2.Google Scholar
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/E. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- GraphPad Software. (2015). http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_skewness_and_kurtosis.htm
- Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in academia. Scientific publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–324.Google Scholar
- von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Martin, B., & Guena, A. (2003). The effects of size on research performance: A SPRU review. Report prepared for the Office of Science and Technology, Department of Trade and Industry (June 2003). Brighton: University of Sussex/SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research).Google Scholar