Scientometrics

, Volume 107, Issue 3, pp 1195–1225 | Cite as

Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature

  • Iman Tahamtan
  • Askar Safipour Afshar
  • Khadijeh Ahamdzadeh
Article

Abstract

The majority of academic papers are scarcely cited while a few others are highly cited. A large number of studies indicate that there are many factors influencing the number of citations. An actual review is missing that provides a comprehensive review of the factors predicting the frequency of citations. In this review, we performed a search in WoS, Scopus, PubMed and Medline to retrieve relevant papers. In overall, 2087 papers were retrieved among which 198 relevant papers were included in the study. Three general categories with twenty eight factors were identified to be related to the number of citations: Category one: “paper related factors”: quality of paper; novelty and interest of subject; characteristics of fields and study topics; methodology; document type; study design; characteristics of results and discussion; use of figures and appendix in papers; characteristics of the titles and abstracts; characteristics of references; length of paper; age of paper; early citation and speed of citation; accessibility and visibility of papers. Category two: “journal related factors”: journal impact factor; language of journal; scope of journal; form of publication. Category three: “author(s) related factors”: number of authors; author’s reputation; author’s academic rank; self-citations; international and national collaboration of authors; authors’ country; gender, age and race of authors; author’s productivity; organizational features; and funding. Probably some factors such as the quality of the paper, journal impact factor, number of authors, visibility and international cooperation are stronger predictors for citations, than authors’ gender, age and race; characteristics of results and discussion and so on.

Keywords

Citations Impact factor Determinant factors Predictive factors Citation characterization Citation analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors very much appreciate professor Lutz Bornmann, a sociologist of Science at the Division for Science and Innovation Studies in the Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society in Munich (Germany) for his valuable comments on the manuscript and his helps for improving the paper. This research was supported by the Health Management Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Supplementary material

11192_2016_1889_MOESM1_ESM.docx (132 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 133 kb)

References

  1. Adams, J. (2005). Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics, 63(3), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adusumilli, P. S., Chan, M. K., Ben-Porat, L., Mullerad, M., Stiles, B. M., Tuorto, S., & Fong, Y. (2005). Citation characteristics of basic science research publications in general surgical journals. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amara, N., Landry, R., & Halilem, N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, 103, 489–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, J. P., & Schneider, J. W. (2011). Influence of study design on the citation patterns of Danish, medical research. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 46–53.Google Scholar
  7. Annalingam, A., Damayanthi, H., Jayawardena, R., & Ranasinghe, P. (2014). Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29(2), 286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ayres, I., & Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1 Part II), 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bárbara, S., Barrantes, B. S. L., Bote, V. P. G., Rodriguez, Z. C., & Anegon, F. D. (2012). Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 481–489. doi:10.1002/asi.21682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnett, G. A., & Fink, E. L. (2008). Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bensman, S. J. (2008). Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1366–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernius, S., & Hanauske, M. (2009). Open access to scientific literatureIncreasing citations as an incentive for authors to make their publications freely accessible. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of the 42nd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-63349109269&partnerID=40&md5=4c0403d6c3c42b463281dccb4820cc76.
  14. Bettencourt, L. A., & Houston, M. B. (2001). The impact of article method type and subject area on article citations and reference diversity in JM, JMR, and JCR. Marketing Letters, 12(4), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhandari, M., Busse, J., Devereaux, P. J., Montori, V. M., Swiontkowski, M., Tornetta Iii, P., & Schemitsch, E. H. (2007). Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 50(2), 119–123.Google Scholar
  16. Bhat, M. H. (2009). Effect of peer review on citations in the open access environment. Library Philosophy and Practice, 11, 1–6.Google Scholar
  17. Biscaro, C., & Giupponi, C. (2014). Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations. PLoS One, 9(6), e99502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bjarnason, T., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2002). Nordic impact: Article productivity and citation patterns in sixteen Nordic Sociology departments. Acta Sociologica, 45(4), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bornmann, L. (2013). The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 722–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1100–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2010). Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2014). How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bornmann, L., & Williams, R. (2013). How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Borsuk, R. M., Budden, A. E., Leimu, R., Aarssen, L. W., & Lortie, C. J. (2009). The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology. Open Ecology Journal, 2, 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bosquet, C., & Combes, P. P. (2013). Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records. Scientometrics, 97(3), 831–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Boyack, K. W., & Börner, K. (2003). Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Buela-Casal, G., & Zych, I. (2010). Analysis of the relationship between the number of citations and the quality evaluated by experts in psychology journals. Psicothema, 22(2), 270–276.Google Scholar
  30. Buter, R. K., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., & Weber, E. (2002). Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2847–2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Callaham, M., Weber, E., & Wears, R. (2001). Citation characteristics of research published in emergency medicine versus other scientific journals. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 38(5), 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cerovšek, T., & Mikoš, M. (2014). A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: Research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chakraborty, T., Kumar, S., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Towards a stratified learning approach to predict future citation counts. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84919398068&partnerID=40&md5=4ab5eaa92d5b8f6d089ef130650f22ac.
  35. Chen, C. M. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431–449. doi:10.1002/asi.21694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Chu, H., & Krichel, T. (2007). Downloads vs. citations in economics: Relationships, contributing factors and beyond. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of ISSI 2007—11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952034760&partnerID=40&md5=93cf9b04e77b4eab198b8568f50e8ca7.
  37. Chung, K. C. (2007). Value of citation numbers and impact factors for analysis of plastic surgery research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(7), 2092–2094. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000296048.38574.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Collet, F., Robertson, D. A., & Lup, D. (2014). When does brokerage matter? Citation impact of research teams in an emerging academic field. Strategic Organization, 12(3), 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Costas, R., Bordons, M., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2009). Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 740–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: Effects of different calculation methods. Scientometrics, 82(3), 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Danthi, N., Wu, C. O., Shi, P., & Lauer, M. (2014). Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants. Circulation Research, 114(4), 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Davis, P. M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. Physiologist, 53(6), 191–200.Google Scholar
  44. De Araújo, C. G. S., De Oliveira, B. R. R., De Oliveira Brito, L. V., Da Matta, T. T., Viana, B. F., De Souza, C. P., & Da Matta Mello Portugal, E. (2012). Two-year citations of JAPPL original articles: Evidence of a relative age effect. Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(9), 1434–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. de Groote, S. L., & Barrett, F. A. (2010). Impact of online journals on citation patterns of dentistry, nursing, and pharmacy faculty. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 98(4), 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. de Groote, S. L., Shultz, M., & Doranski, M. (2005). Online journals’ impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 223–228.Google Scholar
  47. de Winter, J. C. F. (2014). The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1773–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dehghani, L., Jahromi, R. B., & Ganjoo, M. (2011). Citations to highly-cited researchers by their co-authors and their self-citations: How these factors affect highly-cited researchers’ h-index in Scopus. Webology, 8(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
  49. Dervos, D. A., & Kalkanis, T. (2007). cc-IFF: A cascading citations impact factor framework for the automatic ranking of research publications C3. In Proceedings of the third workshop—2005 IEEE intelligent data acquisition and advanced computing systems: Technology and applications, IDAACS 2005, pp. 668–673.Google Scholar
  50. Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Diekhoff, T., Schlattmann, P., & Dewey, M. (2013). Impact of article language in multi-language medical journals—A bibliometric analysis of self-citations and impact factor. PLoS One, 8(10), e76816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dietrich, J. P. (2008). Disentangling visibility and self-promotion bias in the arXiv:astro-ph positional citation effect. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 120(869), 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dorta-González, P., Dorta-González, M. I., Santos-Peñate, D. R., & Suárez-Vega, R. (2014). Journal topic citation potential and between-field comparisons: The topic normalized impact factor. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ebrahim, N. A., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Tanha, F. H., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. M. (2014). Visibility and citation impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Elleby, A., & Ingwersen, P. (2010). Publication point indicators: A comparative case study of two publication point systems and citation impact in an interdisciplinary context. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS One, 8(2), e49476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fanelli, D. (2013). Any publicity is better than none: Newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Farshad, M., Sidler, C., & Gerber, C. (2013). Association of scientific and nonscientific factors to citation rates of articles of renowned orthopedic journals. European Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 4(3), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Filion, K. B., & Pless, I. B. (2008). Factors related to the frequency of citation of epidemiologic publications. Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations, 5(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Foley, J. A., & Della Sala, S. (2010). The impact of self-citation. Cortex, 46(6), 802–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014). Scientific journal publishers and omitted citations in bibliometric databases: Any relationship? Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 751–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Frandsen, T. F., & Nicolaisen, J. (2013). The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Frenken, K., Holzl, W., & de Vor, F. (2005). The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1–2), 9–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengrtecman.2004.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Frenken, K., Ponds, R., & van Oort, F. (2010). The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Frosch, D. L., Tomiyama, A. J., Saxbe, D., Glenn, B. A., Low, C. A., Hanoch, Y., & Meeker, D. (2010). Assessing the scholarly impact of health psychology: A citation analysis of articles published from 1993 to 2003. Health Psychology, 29(5), 555–562. doi:10.1037/a0020750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Fu, L. D., & Aliferis, C. F. (2010). Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics, 85(1), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gallivan, M. J. (2012). Analyzing citation impact of IS research by women and men: Do women have higher levels of research impact? Paper presented at the C3—SIGMIS-CPR’12—Proceedings of the 2012 computers and people research conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863524757&partnerID=40&md5=d488810d10e756a2beaa3839e525e766.
  69. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One, 5(10), e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Garner, J., Porter, A. L., & Newman, N. C. (2014). Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact. Scientometrics, 100(3), 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation, 23(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Georgas, H., & Cullars, J. (2005). A citation study of the characteristics of the linguistics literature. College and Research Libraries, 66(6), 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Gingras, Y., Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J. P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS One, 3(12), e4048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ginsberg, M. D. (2012). Introspection: An analysis of the citation impact of stroke. Stroke, 43(6), 1695–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Glänzel, W., & Zhou, P. (2011). Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 86(2), 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & De Rouen Jr, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Gomes, J. A. N. F., & Vieira, E. S. (2009). How to improve the citation impact of a paper: Choice of journal, co-authors and institutional addresses. Paper presented at the C3—12th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2009. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901983008&partnerID=40&md5=ec158d329d4c5e0b81b579636c7c36f3.
  80. Griffiths, D. N. (2008). The citation of united nations information resources in international relations literature. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 26(4), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language. Scientometrics, 101, 1043–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., & Hidalgo, M. D. (2010). Citation analysis in research on differential item functioning. Quality & Quantity, 44(6), 1249–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Haque, A. U., & Ginsparg, P. (2009). Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2203–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Haque, A. U., & Ginsparg, P. (2010). Last but not least: Additional positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2381–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Harwood, N. (2008). Publication outlets and their effect on academic writers’ citations. Scientometrics, 77(2), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2010). Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Henneken, E. A., & Accomazzi, A. (2011). Linking to data: Effect on citation rates in astronomy (Vol. 461). arXiv:1111.3618.
  88. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Thompson, D., et al. (2006). Effect of E-printing on citation rates in astronomy and physics. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9(2). doi:10.3998/3336451.0009.202.Google Scholar
  89. Hilmer, C. E., & Lusk, J. L. (2009). Determinants of citations to the agricultural and applied economics association journals. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(4), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Holsapple, C. W., & Luo, W. (2003). A citation analysis of influences on collaborative computing research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 12(3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Huang, H., Andrews, J., & Tang, J. (2012). Citation characterization and impact normalization in bioinformatics journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hunt, G. E., Cleary, M., & Walter, G. (2010). Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Hurley, L. A., Ogier, A. L., & Torvik, V. I. (2013). Deconstructing the collaborative impact: Article and author characteristics that influence citation count. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 50(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  94. Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2013). Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: A case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95(2), 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ibáñez, A., Larrañaga, P., & Bielza, C. (2009). Predicting citation count of Bioinformatics papers within four years of publication. Bioinformatics, 25(24), 3303–3309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ingwersen, P., & Larsen, B. (2014). Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1325–1344. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1291-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Garcia-Zorita, J. C., Serrano-Lopez, A. E., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2014). Influence of proceedings papers on citation impact in seven sub-fields of sustainable energy research 2005–2011. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1273–1292. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1335-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubertc, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37–43. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1957-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., & de Oliveira, J. H. C. (2013). The perception of brazilian researchers concerning the factors that influence the citation of their articles: A study in the field of sustainability. Serials Review, 39(2), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Jacques, T. S., & Sebire, N. J. (2010). The impact of article titles on citation hits: An analysis of general and specialist medical journals. JRSM Short Reports, 1(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Jaffe, K. (2011). Do countries with lower self-citation rates produce higher impact papers? Or, does humility pay? Interciencia, 36(9), 694–698.Google Scholar
  102. Jahandideh, S., Abdolmaleki, P., & Asadabadi, E. B. (2007). Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads. Medical Hypotheses, 69(2), 458–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Jiang, J., He, D., & Ni, C. (2013). The correlations between article citation and references’ impact measures: What can we learn. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 50(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  105. Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Mohan, L., Kumar, A., & Gaderao, C. R. (2007). Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Scientometrics, 71(1), 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ke, S. W., Lin, W. C., Tsai, C. F., & Hu, Y. H. (2014). Citation impact analysis of research papers that appear in oral and poster sessions: A case study of three computer science conferences. Online Information Review, 38(6), 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Glynn, C. J. (2013). The Matilda Effect-role congruity effects on scholarly communication: A citation analysis of communication research and journal of communication articles. Communication Research, 40(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P., & Turk, G. (2014). Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kousha, K., & Abdoli, M. (2010). The citation impact of Open Access agricultural research: A comparison between OA and non-OA publications. Online Information Review, 34(5), 772–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of book-based disciplines: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 361–372.Google Scholar
  111. Kulkarni, A. V., Busse, J. W., & Shams, I. (2007). Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS One, 2(5), e403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., & Murray, S. S. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Lachance, C., Poirier, S., & Larivière, V. (2014). The kiss of death? The effect of being cited in a review on subsequent citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1501–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Lee, S. Y., Lee, S., & Jun, S. H. (2010). Author and article characteristics, journal quality and citation in economic research. Applied Economics Letters, 17(17), 1697–1701.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1), 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Lievers, W. B., & Pilkey, A. K. (2012). Characterizing the frequency of repeated citations: The effects of journal, subject area, and self-citation. Information Processing and Management, 48(6), 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lira, R. P. C., Amorim, F. H. R., Gonçalves, F. A., Arieta, C. E. L., & Kara-Junior, N. (2014). Comparison of the citation characteristics between the case reports/cases series versus the other study designs in the articles published in Brazilian journals of ophthalmology. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, 73(1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lira, R. P. C., Vieira, R. M. C., Gonçalves, F. A., Ferreira, M. C. A., Maziero, D., & Arieta, C. E. L. (2013). Influence of English language in the number of citations of articles published in Brazilian journals of Ophthalmology. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 76(1), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., McKinlay, R. J., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ, 336(7645), 655–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Lortie, C. J., Aarssen, L. W., Budden, A. E., & Leimu, R. (2013). Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientometrics, 94(2), 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Lynn, F. B. (2014). Diffusing through disciplines: Insiders, outsiders, and socially influenced citation behavior. Social Forces, 93(1), 355–382.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013). The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization, 67(4), 889–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Mansiaux, Y., & Carrat, F. (2012). Contribution of genome-wide association studies to scientific research: A bibliometric survey of the citation impacts of GWAS and candidate gene studies published during the same period and in the same journals. PLoS One, 7(12), e51408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Marx, W., & Cardona, M. (2003). The impact of Solid State Communications in view of the ISI citation data. Solid State Communications, 127(5), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1284–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2015). Does online availability increase citations? Theory and evidence from a panel of economics and business journals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. McMinn, H. S., & Fleming, K. (2011). Tracking the use of engineering conference papers: Citation influence of the Stapp Car Crash Conference. Collection Building, 30(2), 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Meadows, A. J. (2004). The citation characteristics of astronomical research literature. Journal of Documentation, 60(6), 597–600.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Merritt, D. J. (2000). Scholarly influence in a diverse legal academy: Race, sex, and citation counts. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1 Part II), 345.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics, 239(1–2), 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Miettunen, J., & Nieminen, P. (2003). The effect of statistical methods and study reporting characteristics on the number of citations: A study of four general psychiatric journals. Scientometrics, 57(3), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Millet-Reyes, B. (2013). The impact of citations in International Finance. Global Finance Journal, 24(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Mishra, P. N., Panda, K. C., & Goswami, N. G. (2010). Citation analysis and research impact of National Metallurgical Laboratory, India during 1972–2007: A case study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 15(1), 91–113.Google Scholar
  135. Mitchell, S. M., Lange, S., & Brus, H. (2013). Gendered citation patterns in international relations journals. International Studies Perspectives, 14(4), 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1088–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Nieminen, P., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., & Schumacher, M. (2006). The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Nieri, M., Clauser, C., Franceschi, D., Pagliaro, U., Saletta, D., & Pini-Prato, G. (2007). Randomized clinical trials in implant therapy: Relationships among methodological, statistical, clinical, paratextual features and number of citations. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 18(4), 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Nomaler, T., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2013). Do more distant collaborations have more citation impact? Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 966–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., Lindner, N. M., Kesebir, S., Hawkins, C. B., Hahn, C., & Tenney, E. R. (2010). Cumulative and career-stage citation impact of social-personality psychology programs and their members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1283–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. O’Leary, D. (2008a). On the relationship between citations and appearances on “top 25” download lists in the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(1), 61–75.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. O’Leary, D. E. (2008b). The relationship between citations and number of downloads in Decision Support Systems. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 972–980.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739–764. doi:10.1002/asi.23209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87(2), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Padial, A. A., Nabout, J. C., Siqueira, T., Bini, L. M., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2010). Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles. Scientometrics, 85(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Pagel, P. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). Scholarly productivity of United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists: Influence of fellowship accreditation and transesophageal echocardiographic credentials on h-index and other citation bibliometrics. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 25(5), 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Pasterkamp, G., Rotmans, J. I., De Kleijn, D. V. P., & Borst, C. (2007). Citation frequency: A biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research articles. Scientometrics, 70(1), 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2362–2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Patterson, M. S., & Harris, S. (2009). The relationship between reviewers’ quality-scores and number of citations for papers published in the journal physics in medicine and biology from 2003-2005. Scientometrics, 80(2), 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Peng, T. Q., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2012). Where you publish matters most: A multilevel analysis of factors affecting citations of internet studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1789–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Perneger, T. V. (2004). Relation between online “hit counts” and subsequent citations: Prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. British Medical Journal, 329(7465), 546–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Perneger, T. V. (2015). Online accesses to medical research articles on publication predicted citations up to 15 years later. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 1440–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS One, 2(3), e308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Poomkottayil, D., Bornstein, M. M., & Sendi, P. (2011). Lost in translation: The impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scientific dental literature. Swiss Medical Weekly, 141, 30.Google Scholar
  156. Puuska, H. M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Ralston, R., Gall, C., & Brahmi, F. A. (2008). Do local citation patterns support use of the impact factor for collection development? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96(4), 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Rees, T., Ayling-Rouse, K., & Smith, S. (2012). Accesses versus citations: Why you need to measure both to assess publication impact. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 28, S9–S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Robson, B. J., & Mousquès, A. (2014). Predicting citation counts of environmental modelling papers C3. In Proceedings7th international congress on environmental modelling and software: Bold visions for environmental modeling, iEMSs 2014, Vol. 3, pp. 1390–1396.Google Scholar
  160. Roldan-Valadez, E., & Rios, C. (2015). Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation: Multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 27(2), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Romero, A. G., Cortes, J. N., Escudero, C., Lopez, J. A. F., & Moreno, J. A. C. (2009). Measuring the influence of clinical trials citations on several bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 80(3), 747–760. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2108-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Rostami, F., Mohammadpoorasl, A., & Hajizadeh, M. (2014). The effect of characteristics of title on citation rates of articles. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2007–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Roth, C., Wu, J., & Lozano, S. (2012). Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Royle, P., Kandala, N. B., Barnard, K., & Waugh, N. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic reviews, 2, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Ruano-Ravina, A., & Alvarez-Dardet, C. (2012). Evidence-based editing: Factors influencing the number of citations in a national journal. Annals of Epidemiology, 22(9), 649–653. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.06.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Sala, S. D., & Brooks, J. (2008). Multi-authors’ self-citation: A further impact factor bias? Cortex, 44(9), 1139–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Sangwal, K. (2012). On the relationship between citations of publication output and Hirsch index h of authors: Conceptualization of tapered Hirsch index h T, circular citation area radius R and citation acceleration a. Scientometrics, 93(3), 987–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Schneider, J. W., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Are larger effect sizes in experimental studies good predictors of higher citation rates? A bayesian examination C3. In Proceedings of ISSI 201314th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896830466&partnerID=40&md5=960a18915c0fa828b5625ff9415a083c.
  169. Sin, S. C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Skilton, P. F. (2006). A comparative study of communal practice: Assessing the effects of taken-for-granted-ness on citation practice in scientific communities. Scientometrics, 68(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Skilton, P. F. (2009). Does the human capital of teams of natural science authors predict citation frequency? Scientometrics, 78(3), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Smith, M. J., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E. M., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: Journal placement and citation performance. PLoS One, 9(10), e109195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. So, M., Kim, J., Choi, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: Focused on non-quality factors. Quality & Quantity, 49, 1513–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2007). The citation performance of open access journals: A disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2145–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2009). Countries positioning in open access journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns. Scientometrics, 81(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Vanneste, S., & Verniers, I. (2015). Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(1), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Subotic, S., & Mukherjee, B. (2014). Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles. Journal of Information Science, 40(1), 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Tang, X., Wang, L., & Kishore, R. (2014). Why do is scholars cite other scholars? An empirical analysis of the direct and moderating effects of cooperation and competition among is scholars on individual citation behavior C3. In 35th International conference on information systems “building a better world through information systems”, ICIS 2014.Google Scholar
  180. Tsay, M. Y., & Ma, S. S. (2003). The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 56(2), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Van Der Pol, C. B., McInnes, M. D. F., Petrcich, W., Tunis, A. S., & Hanna, R. (2015). Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates? PLoS One, 10(3), e0119892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A. F. J., Klautz, R. J. M., & Peul, W. C. (2013). Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS One, 8(4), e62395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2005). Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. van Wesel, M., Wyatt, S., & ten Haaf, J. (2014). What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1601–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1075–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2010). Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS One, 7(3), e33339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Walters, G. D. (2006). Predicting subsequent citations to articles published in twelve crime-psychology journals: Author impact versus journal impact. Scientometrics, 69(3), 499–510.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Wang, J. (2014). Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Wang, M., Yu, G., & Yu, D. (2009). Effect of the age of papers on the preferential attachment in citation networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(19), 4273–4276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Weale, A. R., Bailey, M., & Lear, P. A. (2004). The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: A comparison to the impact factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Willis, D. L., Bahler, C. D., Neuberger, M. M., & Dahm, P. (2011). Predictors of citations in the urological literature. BJU International, 107(12), 1876–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Winker, K. (2011). In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: Hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations. BioEssays, 33(6), 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Winnik, S., Raptis, D. A., Walker, J. H., Hasun, M., Speer, T., Clavien, P. A., & Matter, C. M. (2012). From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: Factors predicting publication and citation. European Heart Journal, 33(24), 3034–3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Xia, J., Myers, R. L., & Wilhoite, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Youtie, J. (2014). The use of citation speed to understand the effects of a multi-institutional science center. Scientometrics, 100(3), 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Yu, T., & Yu, G. (2014). Features of scientific papers and the relationships with their citation impact. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 19(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  200. Yu, T., Yu, G., Li, P. Y., & Wang, L. (2014). Citation impact prediction for scientific papers using stepwise regression analysis. Scientometrics, 101, 1233–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Yuan, S. B., & Hua, W. N. (2011). Scholarly impact measurements of LIS open access journals: Based on citations and links. Electronic Library, 29(5), 682–697. doi:10.1108/02640471111177107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Yue, W. P., & Wilson, C. S. (2004). Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: A structural equation modelling analysis. Scientometrics, 60(3), 317–332. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034377.93437.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iman Tahamtan
    • 1
  • Askar Safipour Afshar
    • 2
  • Khadijeh Ahamdzadeh
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Instructor of Medical Library and Information Science, Health Information Management Research CenterHormozgan University of Medical SciencesBandar AbbasIran
  2. 2.Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of ParamedicineHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
  3. 3.Instructor of Medical Library and Information Science, Students Research CommitteeHormozgan University of Medical SciencesBandar AbbasIran

Personalised recommendations