Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa
- 343 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The study sought to explore the underlying factors that influence research collaboration in Library and Information Science (LIS) schools in South Africa. The population for the study consisted of 85 academic teaching staff employed by LIS schools in South African universities. A survey design was used to obtain data for the study, through a questionnaire containing open- and close-ended questions. A total of 85 teaching staff in 10 LIS schools in South Africa were alerted, through email, to the location of the Web-based questionnaires, developed using the Stellarsurvey software. A total of 51 questionnaires were completed and returned for analysis. The findings suggest that factors such as networking, sharing of resources, enhancing productivity, educating students, overcoming intellectual isolation, and accomplishments of projects in a short time as well as learning from peers influenced research collaboration in LIS in South Africa. Factors that are likely to hinder effective collaboration in LIS research include bureaucracy, lack of funding, lack of time, as well as physical distance between researchers. The findings further suggest that even though there are drawbacks to collaboration, majority of LIS researchers thought that collaboration is beneficial and should be encouraged.
Keywords
Research Library and Information Science Universities South AfricaNotes
Acknowledgments
This paper reports part of the findings of Mr Jan Malulaka’s Masters dissertation, which was completed in 2014. Mr Jan Maluleka was a student at the University of South Africa. The project was supervised by Prof Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha, Chair and Professor, Department of Information Science and Prof Isola Ajiferuke, University of Western Ontario.
References
- Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Field, J. (2001). Mentoring: A natural act for information professionals? New Library World, 102(7/8), 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Retrieved February 20, 2010 from: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/Res_col9.pdf
- Leedy, P. D., & Omrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, B. (2009). What’s inside the suitcases? An investigation into the powerful resources students and lecturers bring to teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merlin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2001). Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. In: M. Davis & C. S. Wilson (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Sydney, July, 16–20, 2, 469–476.Google Scholar
- Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Ocholla, D. N. (2008). The current status and challenges of collaboration in library and information studies (LIS) education and training in Africa”. New Library World, 109(9/10), 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ocholla, D. N., & Bothma, T. D. J. (2007). Library and information education and training in South Africa. New Library World, 108(1/2), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Onyancha, O. B. (2009). Towards global partnerships in research in sub-Sahara Africa: An informetric study of the national, regional and international country collaboration in HIV/AIDS literature in eastern and southern Africa. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 75(1), 86–99.Google Scholar
- Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Onyancha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (2007). Country-wise collaborations in HIV/AIDS research in Kenya and South Africa, 1980–2005. LIBRI, 57(4), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, D., & Katz, S. (2000). Collaborative approaches to research. Retrieved July 12, 2012 from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf
- Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Collaboration in information and library science doctoral education. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sun, Y. (2006). Bibliometric analysis of scientific research collaboration between Japan and China. In International workshop on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & seventh COLLNET meeting, Nancy (France), May 10–12, 2006.(Unpublished) [Conference Paper].Google Scholar
- Yamashita, Y., & Okubu, Y. (2006). Patterns of scientific collaboration between Japan and France: Inter-sectoral analysis using Probabilistic Partnership Index (PPI). Scientometrics, 68(2), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2006). Research methods in psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar