, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 873–899 | Cite as

Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries

  • Hamid Bouabid
  • Adèle Paul-Hus
  • Vincent Larivière


Over the last two decades, emerging countries located outside North America and Europe have reshaped the global economy. These countries are also increasing their share of the world’s scientific output. This paper analyzes the evolution of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and G-7 countries’ international scientific collaboration, and compares it with high-technology economic exchanges between 1995–1997 and 2010–2012. Our results show that BRICS scientific activities are enhanced by their high-technology exports and, to a larger extent, by their international collaboration with G-7 countries which remains, over the period studied, at the core of the BRICS scientific collaboration network. However, while high-technology exports made by most BRICS countries to G-7 countries have increased over the studied period, both the intra-BRICS high-technology flows and the intra-BRICS scientific collaboration have remained very weak.


G-7 BRICS Scientific collaboration High-technology Economic cooperation 


  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0284-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63–74. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0305-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basalla, G. (1967). The spread of western. Science, 156(3775), 611–622. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3775.611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC. (2009). Nations eye stable reserve system. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  5. BCG. (2013). Allies and adversaries: 2013 BCG global challengers. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  6. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouabid, H., & Larivière, V. (2013). The lengthening of papers’ life expectancy: A diachronous analysis. Scientometrics, 97(3), 695–717. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0995-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, L., & Daim, T. (2012). Exploring the impact of technology foresight studies on innovation: Case of BRIC countries. Futures, 44(6), 618–630. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Beaver, D. B. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399–408. doi: 10.1023/ Scholar
  10. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finardi, U. (2014). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139–1166. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1490-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finlay, S. C., Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). New methods for an old debate: Utilizing reader response to investigate the relationship between collaboration and quality in academic journal articles. Library & Information Science Research, 34(2), 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goswami, J. N., & Annadurai, M. (2009). Chandrayaan-1: India’s first planetary science mission to the moon. Current Science, 96(4), 486–491.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, L. R. (1993). Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grether, J. M., & Mathys, N. A. (2010). Is the world’s economic centre of gravity already in Asia? Area, 42(1), 47–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00895.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamers, L., Hemeryck, Y., Herweyers, G., Janssen, M., Keters, H., Rousseau, R., & Vanhoutte, A. (1989). Similarity measures in scientometric research: The Jaccard index versus Salton’s cosine formula. Information Processing and Management, 25(3), 315–318. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(89)90048-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanson, G. H. (2012). The rise of middle kingdoms: Emerging economies in global trade (working paper no. 17961). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  18. Harmer, A., & Fleck, F. (2014). The BRICS countries: A new force in global health? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(6), 394–395. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.030614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harzing, A. W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 29–42. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He, Z.-L., Geng, X. S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Institute of International Education. (2013). Top 25 places of origin of international scholars, 2011/12-2012/13. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  23. Jaccard, P. (1901). Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin de Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37(140), 241–272. doi: 10.5169/seals-266440.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554. doi: 10.1007/BF02459299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kharas, H. (2010). The emerging middle class in developing countries (working paper no. 285). OECD Development Centre. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  26. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. doi: 10.1038/430311a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251–263. doi: 10.1002/asi.20274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, L. (2009). Measurement of a shift in the world’s center of economic gravity. Journal of Policy Modelling, 31(4), 489–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein, L., & Salvatore, D. (2013). Shift in the world economic center of gravity from G7 to G20. Journal of Policy Modelling, 35(3), 416–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lakdawalla, E. (2014). China lands on the Moon. Nature Geoscience, 7(2), 81. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519–533. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332. doi: 10.1002/asi.23266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Latapy, M. (2008). Main-memory triangle computations for very large (sparse (power-law)) graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 407(1–3), 458–473. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.07.017.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0197-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85. doi: 10.1002/asi.20732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liao, S. H. (2005). Will China become a military space superpower? Space Policy, 21(3), 205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2005.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD. (2010). Perspectives on global development 2010. Shifting wealth. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  40. OECD. (2012). Science, technology and industry outlook. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  41. OECD. (2013). How is international student mobility shaping up? Education Indicators in Focus, 14, 4. doi: 10.1787/22267077.Google Scholar
  42. Quah, D. (2011). The global economy’s shifting centre of gravity. Global Policy, 2(1), 3–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rigby, J. (2009). Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations. Scientometrics, 78(1), 145–164. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1970-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scherngell, T., & Yuanjia, H. (2011). Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6), 755–772. doi: 10.1080/00343401003713373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. South Africa. (2011). New era as South Africa joins BRICS. Retrieved April 10th 2015 from
  46. Sun, X., Kaur, J., Milojević, S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2013). Social dynamics of science. Scientific Reports, 3, 1069. doi: 10.1038/srep01069.Google Scholar
  47. UNCTAD Statistics. (2014). Merchandise trade matrix—Detailed products, exports in thousands of dollars, annual, 1995–2013. Retrieved August 13th 2014 from
  48. UNCTAD Statistics. (2015a). Nominal and real GDP, total and per capita, annual, 1970–2014. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  49. UNCTAD Statistics. (2015b). Real GDP growth rates, total and per capita, annual, 1970–2014. Retrieved August 7th 2015 from
  50. Yang, L. Y., Yue, T., Ding, J. L., & Han, T. (2012). A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 93(2), 497–516. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0695-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid Bouabid
    • 1
  • Adèle Paul-Hus
    • 2
    • 3
  • Vincent Larivière
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceMohammed V University of RabatRabatMorocco
  2. 2.École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’informationUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST)Université du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations