Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 106, Issue 2, pp 629–644 | Cite as

Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: the case of Japan

  • Naomi FukuzawaEmail author
  • Takanori Ida
Article

Abstract

We analyze the distributions of paper–paper and paper-patent citations and estimate the relationship between them, based on a 4763-paper sample among the top 100 researchers in the life and medical sciences fields in Japan. We find that paper–paper citations peak at a 4-year average, while the corresponding lag for paper-patent citations is 6 years. Moreover, we show that paper quality is important for being cited by a patent. An inverse U-shaped relationship exists between the research grant and research quality, whereas a U-shaped relationship exists between research quality and total number of papers.

Keywords

Science linkages Non-patent references Technology transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Elsevier Japan for its assistance. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25590074.

References

  1. Anderson, J., Williams, N., Seemungal, D., Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1996). Human genetic technology: Exploring the links between science and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouabid, H., & Lariviére, V. (2013). The lengthening of paper’s life expectancy: A diachronous analysis. Scientometrics, 97(3), 695–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callaert, U., Pellens, M., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Source of inspiration? Making sense of Scientific references in patents. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1617–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finardi, U. (2011). Time relations between scientific production and patenting knowledge: The case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics, 89(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finardi, U. (2014). On the time evolution of received citations, in different scientific fields: An empirical study. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glänzel, W. (2004). Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analysis. Scientometrics, 60(3), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403–425.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks, D., Breitzman, A., Kimberly, S., & Narin, F. (2000). Research excellence and patented innovation. Science and Public Policy, 27(5), 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ida, T., & Fukuzawa, N. (2013). Effects of large-scale research funding programs: A Japanese case study. Scientometrics, 94(2), 1253–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jong, S., & Slavova, K. (2014). When publications lead to products: The open science conundrum in new product development. Research Policy, 43(4), 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lo, Azu-chia. (2010). Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research. Scientometrics, 82(1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing author(s). The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C., & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McMillan, G., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology Patents citing scientific literature? Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Narin, F., Hamilton, K., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1998). Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newey, W. (1987). Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics, 36(3), 231–250.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rassenfosse, G. (2013). Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions? Research Policy, 42(5), 1072–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanberg, P., Gharib, M., Harker, P., Kaler, E., Marchase, R., Sands, T., et al. (2014). Changing the academic culture: Valuing patents and commercialization toward tenure and career advancement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(18), 6542–6547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson, P. (2006). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tijssen, R., Buter, R., & Van Leeuwen, Th. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Vianen, B., Moed, H., & Van Raan, A. (1990). An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Marc, L., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., & Deleus, F. (2002). Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54(2), 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wren, J., Kozak, K., Johnson, K., Deakyne, S., Schilling, L., & Dellavalle, R. (2007). A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 988–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zucker, L., & Darby, M. (2001). Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firm’s biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Science and Technology PolicyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and TechnologyChiyoda-kuJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of EconomicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations